${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\mathit CP$-VIOLATING DECAY-RATE ASYMMETRIES

This is the difference between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ partial widths for the decay to state ${{\mathit f}}$, divided by the sum of the widths:$
$ $\mathit A_{CP}({{\mathit f}}$) = [$\Gamma $( ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit f}}$) $−$ $\Gamma $( ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit f}}}$)] $/$ [$\Gamma $( ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit f}}$) + $\Gamma $( ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit f}}}$)].

$\mathit A_{\mathit CP}$( ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \omega}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$) in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}{{\mathit \omega}}$, ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{0}}{{\mathit \omega}}$

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S032A16
VALUE (%) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$-12.6$ $\pm6.0$ $\pm2.6$
AALTONEN
2012AD
 CDF Dalitz fit, $\sim{}$350k evts
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$-26$ $\pm24$ ${}^{+22}_{-4}$
ASNER
2004A
 CLEO Dalitz fit, 4854 evts
Conservation Laws:
$\mathit CP$ INVARIANCE
References