${{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}}$ MASS DIFFERENCES

${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}^{++}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}^{0}}}$

INSPIRE   PDGID:
B104D13
VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 0.220 \pm0.013}$ OUR FIT
$\bf{ 0.221 \pm0.014}$ OUR AVERAGE
$0.22$ $\pm0.01$ $\pm0.01$
LEE
2014
BELL ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ at ${{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$
$0.2$ $\pm0.1$ $\pm0.1$
ARTUSO
2002
CLE2 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\approx{}{{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$
$-0.03$ $\pm0.28$ $\pm0.11$
LINK
2000C
FOCS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ A, ${{\overline{\mathit E}}}_{\gamma }$ 180 GeV
$0.38$ $\pm0.40$ $\pm0.15$
AITALA
1996B
E791 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit N}}$, 500 GeV
$1.1$ $\pm0.4$ $\pm0.1$
CRAWFORD
1993
CLE2 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\approx{}{{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$
$-0.1$ $\pm0.6$ $\pm0.1$
BOWCOCK
1989
CLEO ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ 10 GeV
$1.2$ $\pm0.7$ $\pm0.3$
ALBRECHT
1988D
ARG ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\sim{}$ 10 GeV
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$-10.8$ $\pm2.9$ 1
DIESBURG
1987
SPEC ${{\mathit n}}{}^{}\mathrm {A}$ $\sim{}$600 GeV
1  DIESBURG 1987 is completely incompatible with the other experiments, which is surprising since it agrees with them about ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}^{++}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{+}}}$. We go with the majority here.
References