pdgLive Home   >   LIGHT UNFLAVORED MESONS ($\mathit S$ = $\mathit C$ = $\mathit B$ = 0)   >   ${{\mathit f}_{{{4}}}{(2050)}}$   >   ${{\mathit f}_{{{4}}}{(2050)}}$ WIDTH

${{\mathit f}_{{{4}}}{(2050)}}$ WIDTH

INSPIRE   PDGID:

M016W

VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT $\bf{ 237 \pm18}$ OUR AVERAGE  Error includes scale factor of 1.9.  See the ideogram below. $290$ $\pm20$ AMELIN 2006 VES 36 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \omega}}{{\mathit \omega}}{{\mathit n}}$ $340$ $\pm80$ 1 BINON 2005 GAMS 33 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit n}}$ $395$ $\pm40$ ALDE 1998 GAM4 100 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit n}}$ $170$ $\pm60$ ALDE 1990 GAM2 38 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \omega}}{{\mathit \omega}}{{\mathit n}}$ $304$ $\pm60$ AUGUSTIN 1987 DM2 ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ $210$ $\pm63$ BALTRUSAITIS 1987 MRK3 ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ $400$ $\pm100$ ALDE 1986 D GAM4 100 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit n}}$2 ${{\mathit \eta}}$ $240$ $\pm40$ 40k 2 BINON 1984 B GAM2 38 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit n}}$2 ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ $190$ $\pm14$ DENNEY 1983 LASS 10 ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}/{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit p}}$ $186$ ${}^{+103}_{-58}$ 3 CASON 1982 STRC 8 ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Delta}^{++}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ $305$ ${}^{+36}_{-119}$ ETKIN 1982 B MPS 23 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit n}}$2 ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ $180$ $\pm60$ 700 APEL 1975 NICE 40 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit n}}$2 ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ $225$ ${}^{+120}_{-70}$ BLUM 1975 ASPK 18.4 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit n}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • $260$ $\pm40$ 4 ANISOVICH 2009 RVUE 0.0 ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}{{\mathit p}}$, ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$ $453$ $\pm20$ ${}^{+31}_{-129}$ 5 UEHARA 2009 BELL 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ $182$ $\pm7$ ANISOVICH 2000 J SPEC 2.0 ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \eta}}$, ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \eta}^{\,'}}$, ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ $\sim$$170$ 6 MARTIN 1998 RVUE ${{\mathit N}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit N}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ $\sim$$200$ 7 MARTIN 1997 RVUE ${{\overline{\mathit N}}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ $\sim$$60$ 8 OAKDEN 1994 RVUE $0.36 - 1.55$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ $\sim$$80$ 9 OAKDEN 1994 RVUE $0.36 - 1.55$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ $243$ $\pm16$ 10 ALPER 1980 CNTR 62 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit n}}$ $140$ $\pm15$ 10 ROZANSKA 1980 SPRK 18 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}{{\mathit n}}$ $263$ $\pm57$ 10 CORDEN 1979 OMEG 12$-$15 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit n}}$2 ${{\mathit \pi}}$ $100$ $\pm28$ EVANGELISTA 1979 B OMEG 10 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit n}}$ $107$ $\pm56$ 11 ANTIPOV 1977 CIBS 25 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}$3 ${{\mathit \pi}}$ 1  From the first PWA solution. 2  From a partial-wave analysis of the data. 3  From an amplitude analysis of the reaction ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ 2 ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$. 4  K matrix pole. 5  Taking into account the ${{\mathit f}_{{{2}}}{(1950)}}$. Helicity-2 production favored. 6  Energy-dependent analysis. 7  Single energy analysis. 8  From solution A of amplitude analysis of data on ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$. See however KLOET 1996 who fit ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ only and find waves only up to $\mathit J = 3$ to be important but not significantly resonant. 9  From solution B of amplitude analysis of data on ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$. See however KLOET 1996 who fit ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ only and find waves only up to $\mathit J = 3$ to be important but not significantly resonant. 10  $\mathit I(\mathit J{}^{P}) = 0(4{}^{+})$ from amplitude analysis assuming one-pion exchange. 11  Width errors enlarged by us to 4${}\Gamma /\sqrt {\mathit N }$; see the note with the ${{\mathit K}^{*}{(892)}}$ mass.

${{\mathit f}_{{{4}}}{(2050)}}$ width (MeV)

References