${{\mathit f}_{{{2}}}{(1950)}}$ WIDTH

INSPIRE   PDGID:
M135W
VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 464 \pm24}$ OUR AVERAGE
$380$ ${}^{+120}_{-90}$
BAI
2000A
BES ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}$( ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$)
$520$ $\pm50$ 1
BARBERIS
2000C
450 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$4 ${{\mathit \pi}}$
$485$ $\pm55$ 2
BARBERIS
2000C
450 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$4 ${{\mathit \pi}}$
$460$ $\pm40$
BARBERIS
1997B
OMEG 450 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$2( ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$)
$390$ $\pm60$
ANTINORI
1995
OMEG 300,450 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$2( ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$)
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$441$ ${}^{+27}_{-25}$ ${}^{+28}_{-192}$ 3
UEHARA
2009
BELL 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$
$450$ $\pm50$ 4
BINON
2005
GAMS 33 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit n}}$
$297$ $\pm12$ $\pm6$
ABE
2004
BELL 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$
$495$ $\pm35$
ANISOVICH
2000J
SPEC
$500$ $\pm100$
ANISOVICH
1999B
SPEC $1.35 - 1.94$ ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \eta}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$
$\sim$$100$ 5
OAKDEN
1994
RVUE $0.36 - 1.55$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$
$250$ $\pm50$ 6
ASTON
1991
LASS 11 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Lambda}}{{\mathit K}}{{\overline{\mathit K}}}{{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$
1  Decaying into ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$2 ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$.
2  Decaying into 2(${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$).
3  Taking into account ${{\mathit f}_{{{4}}}{(2050)}}$.
4  First solution, PWA is ambiguous.
5  From solution B of amplitude analysis of data on ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$. See however KLOET 1996 who fit ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ only and find waves only up to $\mathit J = 3$ to be important but not significantly resonant.
6  Cannot determine spin to be 2.
References