${{\mathit \Lambda}}$ MASS

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S018M
The fit uses ${{\mathit \Lambda}}$, ${{\mathit \Sigma}^{+}}$, ${{\mathit \Sigma}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit \Sigma}^{-}}$ mass and mass-difference measurements.
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 1115.683 \pm0.006}$ OUR FIT
$\bf{ 1115.683 \pm0.006}$ OUR AVERAGE
$1115.678$ $\pm0.006$ $\pm0.006$ 20k
HARTOUNI
1994
SPEC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ $27.5$ ${\mathrm {GeV/}}\mathit c$
$1115.690$ $\pm0.008$ $\pm0.006$ 18k 1
HARTOUNI
1994
SPEC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ $27.5$ ${\mathrm {GeV/}}\mathit c$
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$1115.59$ $\pm0.08$ 935
HYMAN
1972
HEBC
$1115.39$ $\pm0.12$ 195
MAYEUR
1967
EMUL
$1115.6$ $\pm0.4$
LONDON
1966
HBC
$1115.65$ $\pm0.07$ 488 2
SCHMIDT
1965
HBC
$1115.44$ $\pm0.12$ 3
BHOWMIK
1963
RVUE
1  We assume $\mathit CPT$ invariance: this is the ${{\overline{\mathit \Lambda}}}$ mass as measured by HARTOUNI 1994. See below for the fractional mass difference, testing $\mathit CPT$.
2  The SCHMIDT 1965 masses have been reevaluated using our April 1973 proton and ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\mathit \pi}^{\pm}}$ masses. P. Schmidt, private communication (1974).
3  The mass has been raised 35 keV to take into account a 46 keV increase in the proton mass and an 11 keV decrease in the ${{\mathit \pi}^{\pm}}$ mass (note added Reviews of Modern Physics 39 1 (1967)).
References