${{\mathit H}}$ SIGNAL STRENGTHS IN DIFFERENT CHANNELS

The ${{\mathit H}}$ signal strength in a particular final state ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ is given by the cross section times branching ratio in this channel normalized to the Standard Model (SM) value, $\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ) $/$ ($\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ))$_{{\mathrm {SM}}}$, for the specified mass value of ${{\mathit H}}$. For the SM predictions, see DITTMAIER 2011 , DITTMAIER 2012 , and HEINEMEYER 2013A. Results for fiducial and differential cross sections are also listed below.

${{\mathit \tau}^{+}}{{\mathit \tau}^{-}}$ Final State

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S126STT
VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 0.91 \pm0.09}$ OUR AVERAGE
$0.85$ $\pm0.10$ 1
CMS
2022
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.22}$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.11}$ 2
AABOUD
2019AQ
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.11$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ 3, 4
AAD
2016AN
 LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$1.68$ ${}^{+2.28}_{-1.68}$ 5
AALTONEN
2013M
 TEVA ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
6
AAD
2022Q
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$2.5$ ${}^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ 7
SIRUNYAN
2019AF
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ / ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.24$ ${}^{+0.29}_{-0.27}$ 8
SIRUNYAN
2019AF
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.02$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ 9
SIRUNYAN
2019AT
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.27}_{-0.26}$ 10
SIRUNYAN
2018Y
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$0.98$ $\pm0.18$ 11
SIRUNYAN
2018Y
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8, 13 TeV
$2.3$ $\pm1.6$ 12
AAD
2016AC
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ / ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 8 TeV
$1.41$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.36}$ 4
AAD
2016AN
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.88$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.28}$ 4
AAD
2016AN
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$1.44$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.29}$ ${}^{+0.29}_{-0.23}$ 13
AAD
2016K
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$1.43$ ${}^{+0.27}_{-0.26}$ ${}^{+0.32}_{-0.25}$ $\pm0.09$ 14
AAD
2015AH
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.78$ $\pm0.27$ 15
CHATRCHYAN
2014K
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.00$ ${}^{+8.44}_{-0.00}$ 16
AALTONEN
2013L
 CDF ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$3.96$ ${}^{+4.11}_{-3.38}$ 17
ABAZOV
2013L
 D0 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$0.4$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-2.0}$ 18
AAD
2012AI
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7 TeV
$0.09$ ${}^{+0.76}_{-0.74}$ 19
CHATRCHYAN
2012N
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
1  CMS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 2) using up to 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. See their Fig. 2 right.
2  AABOUD 2019AQ use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The first, second and third quoted errors are statistical, experimental systematic and theory systematic uncertainties, respectively. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV and corresponds to 4.4 standard deviations. Combining with 7 TeV and 8 TeV results (AAD 2015AH), the observed significance is 6.4 standard deviations. The cross sections in the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ decay channel (${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV) are measured to $3.77$ ${}^{+0.60}_{-0.59}$ (stat) ${}^{+0.87}_{-0.74}$ (syst) pb for the inclusive, $0.28$ $\pm0.09$ ${}^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ pb for VBF, and $3.1$ $\pm1.0$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ pb for gluon-fusion production. See their Table XI for the cross sections in the framework of simplified template cross sections.
3  AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.0$ $\pm0.6$ for gluon fusion, $1.3$ $\pm0.4$ for vector boson fusion, $-1.4$ $\pm1.4$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $2.2$ ${}^{+2.2}_{-1.8}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $-1.9$ ${}^{+3.7}_{-3.3}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.
4  AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
5  AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
6  AAD 2022Q measure cross sections of ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with 139 fb${}^{-1}$ data. The quoted results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and $\vert $y(${{\mathit H}})\vert <$2.5 is required. The inclusive fiducial ${{\mathit \sigma}}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$ is $2.94$ $\pm0.21$ ${}^{+0.37}_{-0.32}$ pb. The fiducial ${{\mathit \sigma}}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$ for the four dominant production modes are $2.65$ $\pm0.41$ ${}^{+0.91}_{-0.67}$ pb for ggF, $0.197$ $\pm0.028$ ${}^{+0.032}_{-0.026}$ pb for VBF, $0.115$ $\pm0.058$ ${}^{+0.042}_{-0.040}$ pb for ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ , $0.033$ $\pm0.031$ ${}^{+0.022}_{-0.017}$ pb for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ . The cross sections using simplified template cross section framework (STXS) are given in their Fig. 14(a) and Table 15. The STXS bins (a reduced stage 1.2) are defined in their Fig. 1.
7  SIRUNYAN 2019AF use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV and corresponds to 2.3 standard deviations.
8  SIRUNYAN 2019AF use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ /${{\mathit Z}}$ channels are added with a few updates on gluon fusion and vector boson fusion with respect to SIRUNYAN 2018Y. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV and corresponds to 5.5 standard deviations. The signal strengths for the individual production modes are: $1.12$ ${}^{+0.53}_{-0.50}$ for gluon fusion, $1.13$ ${}^{+0.45}_{-0.42}$ for vector boson fusion, $3.39$ ${}^{+1.68}_{-1.54}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ and $1.23$ ${}^{+1.62}_{-1.35}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ . See their Fig. 7 for other couplings ( ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{V,}}}{{\mathit \kappa}_{{f}}}$ ).
9  SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. This combination is based on SIRUNYAN 2018Y.
10  SIRUNYAN 2018Y use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and corresponds to 4.9 standard deviations.
11  SIRUNYAN 2018Y combine the result of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with the results obtained from data of 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV (KHACHATRYAN 2015AM). The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and corresponds to 5.9 standard deviations.
12  AAD 2016AC measure the signal strength with ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ / ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ processes using 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
13  AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
14  AAD 2015AH use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The third uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The signal strength for the gluon fusion mode is $2.0$ $\pm0.8$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-0.8}$ $\pm0.3$ and that for vector boson fusion and ${{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production modes is $1.24$ ${}^{+0.49}_{-0.45}{}^{+0.31}_{-0.29}$ $\pm0.08$. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
15  CHATRCHYAN 2014K use 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2014AJ.
16  AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
17  ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
18  AAD 2012AI obtain results based on 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given in their Fig. 10 for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also Fig. 13 of AAD 2012DA.
19  CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=7 TeV and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$=125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y .
References:
AAD 2022Q
JHEP 2208 175 Measurements of Higgs boson production cross-sections in the $H\to\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ decay channel in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector
CMS 2022
NAT 607 60 A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery
AABOUD 2019AQ
PR D99 072001 Cross-section measurements of the Higgs boson decaying into a pair of $\tau$-leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector
SIRUNYAN 2019AT
EPJ C79 421 Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton?proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {Te}\text {V} $
SIRUNYAN 2019AF
JHEP 1906 093 Search for the associated production of the Higgs boson and a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV via Higgs boson decays to $\tau$ leptons
SIRUNYAN 2018Y
PL B779 283 Observation of the Higgs boson decay to a pair of $\tau$ leptons with the CMS detector
AAD 2016AN
JHEP 1608 045 Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Constraints on its Couplings from a Combined ATLAS and CMS Analysis of the LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ =7 and 8 TeV
AAD 2016K
EPJ C76 6 Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Coupling Strengths using ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS Experiment
AAD 2016AC
PR D93 092005 Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson Produced in Association with a Vector Boson and Decaying into a Tau Pair in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector
AAD 2015AH
JHEP 1504 117 Evidence for the Higgs-Boson Yukawa Coupling to tau Leptons with the ATLAS Detector
CHATRCHYAN 2014K
JHEP 1405 104 Evidence for the 125 GeV Higgs Boson Decaying to a Pair of ${{\mathit \tau}}$ Leptons
AALTONEN 2013L
PR D88 052013 Combination of Searches for the Higgs Boson Using the Full CDF Data Set
AALTONEN 2013M
PR D88 052014 Higgs Boson Studies at the Tevatron
ABAZOV 2013L
PR D88 052011 Combined Search for the Higgs Boson with the ${D0}$ Experiment
AAD 2012AI
PL B716 1 Observation of a New Particle in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC
CHATRCHYAN 2012N
PL B716 30 Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC