pdgLive

${{\mathit H}}$ SIGNAL STRENGTHS IN DIFFERENT CHANNELS

The ${{\mathit H}}$ signal strength in a particular final state ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ is given by the cross section times branching ratio in this channel normalized to the Standard Model (SM) value, $\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ) $/$ ($\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ))$_{{\mathrm {SM}}}$, for the specified mass value of ${{\mathit H}}$. For the SM predictions, see DITTMAIER 2011 , DITTMAIER 2012 , and HEINEMEYER 2013A. Results for fiducial and differential cross sections are also listed below.

Combined Final States

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$\bf{ 1.03 \pm0.04}$

OUR AVERAGE

$1.05$ $\pm0.06$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV

$1.002$ $\pm0.057$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV

$1.09$ $\pm0.07$ $\pm0.04$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$

LHC

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$1.44$ ${}^{+0.59}_{-0.56}$

TEVA

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

$1.11$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV

$1.17$ $\pm0.10$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, diiferential cross sections

$1.20$ $\pm0.10$ $\pm0.06$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$0.97$ $\pm0.09$ $\pm0.05$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$1.18$ $\pm0.10$ $\pm0.07$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$0.75$ ${}^{+0.28}_{-0.26}$ ${}^{+0.13}_{-0.11}$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7 TeV

$1.28$ $\pm0.11$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 8 TeV

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 8 TeV, cross section

$1.00$ $\pm0.09$ $\pm0.07$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$1.33$ ${}^{+0.14}_{-0.10}$ $\pm0.15$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7 and 8 TeV

$1.54$ ${}^{+0.77}_{-0.73}$

CDF

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV

$1.40$ ${}^{+0.92}_{-0.88}$

D0

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV

$1.4$ $\pm0.3$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$1.2$ $\pm0.4$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7 TeV

$1.5$ $\pm0.4$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 8 TeV

$0.87$ $\pm0.23$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

¹

ATLAS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 1) using up to 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. The Higgs production cross-sections, branching fractions and several ratios are found in their Figs. 2 and 3.

²	CMS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 2) using 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. Signal strengths for production modes and decay channels are found in their Fig. 2.

³

AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.03$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ for gluon fusion, $1.18$ ${}^{+0.25}_{-0.23}$ for vector boson fusion, $0.89$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.38}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $0.79$ ${}^{+0.38}_{-0.36}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $2.3$ ${}^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.

⁴

AAD 2016AN: The uncertainties represent statistics, experimental systematics, and added in quadrature theory systematics on the background and on the signal. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. In the fit, relative branching ratios and relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model.

⁵

AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

⁶

AAD 2020 combine results of up to 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV: ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ , invisible, and off-shell analyses (see their Table I). The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.04$ $\pm0.09$ for gluon fusion, $1.21$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ for vector boson fusion, $1.30$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.38}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $1.05$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.29}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.21$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ + ${{\mathit t}}{{\mathit H}}$ production (see their Fig. 2 and Table IV). Several results with the simplified template cross section and $\kappa $-frameworks are presented: see their Figs. $9 - 11$, Figs 20, 21 and Table VIII for stage-1 simplified template cross sections, their Figs. $12 - 17$ and Tables X$-$XII for the $\kappa $-framework.

⁷

SIRUNYAN 2019AT combine results of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.22$ ${}^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$ for gluon fusion, $0.73$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.27}$ for vector boson fusion, $2.18$ ${}^{+0.58}_{-0.55}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $0.87$ ${}^{+0.44}_{-0.42}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.18$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.27}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production. Several results with the simplified template cross section and $\kappa $-frameworks are presented: see their Fig. 8 and Table 5 for stage-0 simplified template cross sections, their Figs. $9 - 18$ and Tables $7 - 11$ for the $\kappa $-framework.

⁸

SIRUNYAN 2019BA measure differential cross sections for the Higgs boson transverse momentum, the number of jets, the rapidity of the Higgs boson and the transverse momentum of the leading jet using 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ , and ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ . The total cross section for Higgs boson production is measured to be $61.1$ $\pm6.0$ $\pm3.7$ pb using ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ channels. Several coupling measurements in the $\kappa $-framework are performed.

⁹

AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The third uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The signal strengths for individual production modes are $1.23$ $\pm0.14$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}{}^{+0.16}_{-0.12}$ for gluon fusion, $1.23$ ${}^{+0.28}_{-0.27}{}^{+0.13}_{-0.12}{}^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ for vector boson fusion, $0.80$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.30}$ $\pm0.17$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.05}$ for ${{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.81$ ${}^{+0.52}_{-0.50}{}^{+0.58}_{-0.55}{}^{+0.31}_{-0.12}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.

¹⁰

AAD 2015P measure total and differential cross sections of the process ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV with 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$. ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and 4${{\mathit \ell}}$ final states are used. ${\mathit \sigma (}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}{)}$ = $33.0$ $\pm5.3$ $\pm1.6$ pb is given. See their Figs. 2 and 3 for data on differential cross sections.

¹¹

KHACHATRYAN 2015AM use up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The third uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. Fits to each production mode give the value of $0.85$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.16}$ for gluon fusion, $1.16$ ${}^{+0.37}_{-0.34}$ for vector boson fusion, $0.92$ ${}^{+0.38}_{-0.36}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $2.90$ ${}^{+1.08}_{-0.94}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.

¹²

AAD 2013AK use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The combined signal strength is based on the ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ , and ${{\mathit W}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ channels. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. Reported statistical error value modified following private communication with the experiment.

¹³	AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

¹⁴	ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

¹⁵

AAD 2012AI obtain results based on $4.6 - 4.8$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and $5.8 - 5.9$ fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. An excess of events over background with a local significance of 5.9 $\sigma $ is observed at ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also AAD 2012DA.

¹⁶

CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on $4.9 - 5.1$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and $5.1 - 5.3$ fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. An excess of events over background with a local significance of 5.0$~\sigma $ is observed at about ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. The combined signal strength is based on the ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}^{+}}{{\mathit \tau}^{-}}$ , and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ channels. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.

References:

NAT 607 52

A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery

NAT 612 E24 (errat.)

A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery

NAT 607 60

A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery

PR D101 012002

Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to $80$ fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment

PL B792 369

Measurement and interpretation of differential cross sections for Higgs boson production at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

EPJ C79 421

Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton?proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {Te}\text {V} $

JHEP 1608 045

Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Constraints on its Couplings from a Combined ATLAS and CMS Analysis of the LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ =7 and 8 TeV

EPJ C76 6

Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Coupling Strengths using ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS Experiment

PRL 115 091801

Measurements of the Total and Differential Higgs Boson Production Cross Sections Combining the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ Decay Channels at $\sqrt {s }$ =8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector

EPJ C75 212

Precise Determination of the Mass of the Higgs Boson and Tests of Compatibility of its Couplings with the Standard Model Predictions using Proton Collisions at 7 and 8 TeV

PL B726 88

Measurements of Higgs Boson Production and Couplings in Diboson Final States with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC

PL B734 406 (errat.)

Erratum to AAD 2013AK Measurements of Higgs Boson Production and Couplings in Diboson Final States with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC

PR D88 052013

Combination of Searches for the Higgs Boson Using the Full CDF Data Set

PR D88 052014

Higgs Boson Studies at the Tevatron

PR D88 052011

Combined Search for the Higgs Boson with the ${D0}$ Experiment

PL B716 1

Observation of a New Particle in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC

PL B716 30

Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC

Except where otherwise noted, content of the 2023 Review of Particle Physics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. The publication of the Review of Particle Physics is supported by US DOE, MEXT (Japan), INFN (Italy), JPS and CERN. Individual collaborators receive support for their PDG activities from their respective institutes or funding agencies. © 2023. See LBNL disclaimers.