${{\mathit H}}$ SIGNAL STRENGTHS IN DIFFERENT CHANNELS

The ${{\mathit H}}$ signal strength in a particular final state ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ is given by the cross section times branching ratio in this channel normalized to the Standard Model (SM) value, $\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ) $/$ ($\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ))$_{{\mathrm {SM}}}$, for the specified mass value of ${{\mathit H}}$. For the SM predictions, see DITTMAIER 2011 , DITTMAIER 2012 , and HEINEMEYER 2013A. Results for fiducial and differential cross sections are also listed below.

${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ Final State

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S126SWW
VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 1.00 \pm0.08}$ OUR AVERAGE
$0.97$ $\pm0.09$ 1
CMS
2022
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.16}$ 2, 3
AAD
2016AN
LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.94$ ${}^{+0.85}_{-0.83}$ 4
AALTONEN
2013M
TEVA ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$0.5$ $\pm0.4$ ${}^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ 5
AAD
2022V
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ( $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ ) + 2 ${{\mathit j}}$ , 13 TeV
6
AAD
2022V
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ( $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ ) + 2 ${{\mathit j}}$ , 13 TeV
7
AABOUD
2019F
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, cross sections
$2.5$ ${}^{+0.9}_{-0.8}$ 8
AAD
2019A
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.28$ ${}^{+0.17}_{-0.16}$ 9
SIRUNYAN
2019AT
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.28$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$ 10
SIRUNYAN
2019AX
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.22$ ${}^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$ 3
AAD
2016AN
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.90$ ${}^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$ 3
AAD
2016AN
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
11
AAD
2016AO
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 8 TeV, cross sections
$1.18$ $\pm0.16$ ${}^{+0.17}_{-0.14}$ 12
AAD
2016K
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.15}$ ${}^{+0.17}_{-0.14}$ 13
AAD
2015AA
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$3.0$ ${}^{+1.3}_{-1.1}$ ${}^{+1.0}_{-0.7}$ 14
AAD
2015AQ
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$1.16$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.15}$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.15}$ 15
AAD
2015AQ
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.72$ $\pm0.12$ $\pm0.10$ ${}^{+0.12}_{-0.10}$ 16
CHATRCHYAN
2014G
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.99$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.28}$ 17
AAD
2013AK
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7 and 8 TeV
$0.00$ ${}^{+1.78}_{-0.00}$ 18
AALTONEN
2013L
CDF ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$1.90$ ${}^{+1.63}_{-1.52}$ 19
ABAZOV
2013L
D0 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$1.3$ $\pm0.5$ 20
AAD
2012AI
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.5$ $\pm0.6$ 20
AAD
2012AI
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7 TeV
$1.9$ $\pm0.7$ 20
AAD
2012AI
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 8 TeV
$0.60$ ${}^{+0.42}_{-0.37}$ 21
CHATRCHYAN
2012N
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
1  CMS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 2) using up to 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. See their Fig. 2 right.
2  AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $0.84$ $\pm0.17$ for gluon fusion, $1.2$ $\pm0.4$ for vector boson fusion, $1.6$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $5.9$ ${}^{+2.6}_{-2.2}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $5.0$ ${}^{+1.8}_{-1.7}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.
3  AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
4  AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
5  AAD 2022V measure the signal strength for ggF+2jets with 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ data at 13 TeV.
6  AAD 2022V probe the Higgs couplings to longitudinally and transversely polarized ${{\mathit W}}$ and ${{\mathit Z}}$ using VBF ( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ plus two jets) with 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The ratios of the polarization-dependent couplings $\mathit g_{ {{\mathit H}} {{\mathit V}_{{L}}} {{\mathit V}_{{L}}} }$ and $\mathit g_{ {{\mathit H}} {{\mathit V}_{{T}}} {{\mathit V}_{{T}}} }$ to the Higgs-${{\mathit V}}$ coupling predicted by the SM, ${{\mathit a}_{{L}}}$ = $\mathit g_{ {{\mathit H}} {{\mathit V}_{{L}}} {{\mathit V}_{{L}}} }/\mathit g{}^{{\mathrm {SM}}}_{ HVV}$ and ${{\mathit a}_{{T}}}$ = $\mathit g_{ {{\mathit H}} {{\mathit V}_{{T}}} {{\mathit V}_{{T}}} }/\mathit g{}^{{\mathrm {SM}}}_{ HVV}$ are measured to be $0.91$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.18}{}^{+0.09}_{-0.17}$ and $1.2$ $\pm0.4$ ${}^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$, respectively, assuming the standard ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit g}}{{\mathit g}}$ coupling. These measurements are translated into pseudo-observables of ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{VV}}}$ and ${{\mathit \epsilon}_{{VV}}}$: ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{VV}}}$ = $0.91$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.18}{}^{+0.09}_{-0.17}$ and ${{\mathit \epsilon}_{{VV}}}$ = $0.13$ ${}^{+0.28}_{-0.20}{}^{+0.08}_{-0.10}$, where ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{VV}}}$ = 1 and ${{\mathit \epsilon}_{{VV}}}$ = 0 for the SM. See their Tables 9 and 10.
7  AABOUD 2019F measure cross-sections times the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ branching fraction in the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ channel using 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV: $\sigma _{ggF}{\times }$B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ) = $11.4$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.1}{}^{+1.8}_{-1.7}$ pb and $\sigma _{VBF}{\times }$B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ) = $0.50$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ $\pm0.17$ pb.
8  AAD 2019A use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ data at 13 TeV. The cross section times branching fraction values are measured to be $0.67$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.27}{}^{+0.18}_{-0.14}$ pb for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ and $0.54$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.24}{}^{+0.15}_{-0.07}$ pb for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ .
9  SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
10  SIRUNYAN 2019AX measure the signal strengths, cross sections and so on using gluon fusion, VBF and ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ production processes with 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. Signal strengths for each production process is found in their Fig. 9. Measured cross sections and ratios to the SM predictions in the stage-0 simplified template cross section framework are shown in their Fig. 10. ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{F}}}$ = $1.52$ ${}^{+0.48}_{-0.41}$ and ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{V}}}$ = $1.10$ $\pm0.08$ are obtained (see their Fig. 11 (right)).
11  AAD 2016AO measure fiducial total and differential cross sections of gluon fusion process at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV with 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ using ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ . The measured fiducial total cross section is $36.0$ $\pm9.7$ fb in their fiducial region (Table 7). See their Fig. 6 for fiducial differential cross sections. The results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
12  AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
13  AAD 2015AA use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The signal strength for the gluon fusion and vector boson fusion mode is $1.02$ $\pm0.19$ ${}^{+0.22}_{-0.18}$ and $1.27$ ${}^{+0.44}_{-0.40}{}^{+0.30}_{-0.21}$, respectively. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
14  AAD 2015AQ use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
15  AAD 2015AQ combine their result on ${{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with the results of AAD 2015AA (gluon fusion and vector boson fusion, slightly updated). The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
16  CHATRCHYAN 2014G use 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.4 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The last uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.6 GeV.
17  AAD 2013AK use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. Superseded by AAD 2015AA.
18  AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
19  ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
20  AAD 2012AI obtain results based on 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also AAD 2012DA.
21  CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.
References:
AAD 2022V
EPJ C82 622 Constraints on Higgs boson properties using $WW^{*}(\rightarrow e\nu \mu \nu )jj$ production in $36.1\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector
CMS 2022
NAT 607 60 A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery
AABOUD 2019F
PL B789 508 Measurements of gluon-gluon fusion and vector-boson fusion Higgs boson production cross-sections in the $H \to WW^{\ast} \to e\nu\mu\nu$ decay channel in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector
AAD 2019A
PL B798 134949 Measurement of the production cross section for a Higgs boson in association with a vector boson in the $H \to WW^{\ast} \to \ell\nu\ell\nu$ channel in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector
SIRUNYAN 2019AT
EPJ C79 421 Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton?proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {Te}\text {V} $
SIRUNYAN 2019AX
PL B791 96 Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV
AAD 2016K
EPJ C76 6 Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Coupling Strengths using ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS Experiment
AAD 2016AO
JHEP 1608 104 Measurement of Fiducial Differential Cross Sections of Gluon-Fusion Production of Higgs Bosons Decaying to ${{\mathit W}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ with the ATLAS Detector at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV
AAD 2016AN
JHEP 1608 045 Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Constraints on its Couplings from a Combined ATLAS and CMS Analysis of the LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ =7 and 8 TeV
AAD 2015AQ
JHEP 1508 137 Study of (${{\mathit W}}/{{\mathit Z}}){{\mathit H}}$ Production and Higgs Boson Couplings using ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ Decays with the ATLAS Detector
AAD 2015AA
PR D92 012006 Observation and Measurement of Higgs Boson Decays to ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ with the ATLAS Detector
CHATRCHYAN 2014G
JHEP 1401 096 Measurement of Higgs Boson Production and Properties in the ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}}$ Decay Channel with Leptonic Final States
AAD 2013AK
PL B726 88 Measurements of Higgs Boson Production and Couplings in Diboson Final States with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC
Also
PL B734 406 (errat.) Erratum to AAD 2013AK Measurements of Higgs Boson Production and Couplings in Diboson Final States with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC
AALTONEN 2013L
PR D88 052013 Combination of Searches for the Higgs Boson Using the Full CDF Data Set
AALTONEN 2013M
PR D88 052014 Higgs Boson Studies at the Tevatron
ABAZOV 2013L
PR D88 052011 Combined Search for the Higgs Boson with the ${D0}$ Experiment
AAD 2012AI
PL B716 1 Observation of a New Particle in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC
CHATRCHYAN 2012N
PL B716 30 Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC