pdgLive

2021

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$

$1.2$ $\pm0.3$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$

$1.9$ ${}^{+0.8}_{-0.7}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

$0.35$ ${}^{+0.36}_{-0.34}$

⁴

2022

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$

$1.43$ ${}^{+0.33}_{-0.31}$ ${}^{+0.21}_{-0.15}$

⁵

2020

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$

$1.38$ ${}^{+0.36}_{-0.29}$

⁶

2020

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$

$0.72$ $\pm0.24$ $\pm0.38$

⁷

2019

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$

$1.6$ ${}^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$

⁸

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$

⁹

ATLS

$0.84$ ${}^{+0.64}_{-0.61}$

¹⁰

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$

$0.9$ $\pm1.5$

¹¹

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$

$1.23$ ${}^{+0.45}_{-0.43}$

¹²

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$

$1.26$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.26}$

¹³

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8, 13 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$

$1.7$ $\pm0.8$

¹⁴

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , and ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$

$2.3$ ${}^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$

¹⁵ ^{, 3}

LHC

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$2.9$ ${}^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$1.81$ ${}^{+0.52}_{-0.50}$ ${}^{+0.58}_{-0.55}$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.12}$

¹⁶

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$1.4$ ${}^{+2.1}_{-1.4}$ ${}^{+0.6}_{-0.3}$

¹⁷

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$1.5$ $\pm1.1$

¹⁸

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 8 TeV

$2.1$ ${}^{+1.4}_{-1.2}$

¹⁹

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 8 TeV

$1.2$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-1.5}$

²⁰

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 8 TeV

$2.8$ ${}^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$

²¹

2014

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV

$9.49$ ${}^{+6.60}_{-6.28}$

²²

AALTONEN

2013

CDF

${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ , 1.96 TeV

$< 5.8 at 95\% CL$

²³

CHATRCHYAN

2013

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$

SIRUNYAN 2021R search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ in final states with electrons, muons and hadronically decaying ${{\mathit \tau}}$ leptons ( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ ) with 137 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 4.7 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

AABOUD 2018AC combine results of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ( $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ , ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ ), ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ ( $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ , ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ ) with results of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (AABOUD 2018T), ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ (AABOUD 2018BO), ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ ( $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ ) (AABOUD 2018AJ) in 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. See their Table 14.

³	AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative branching ratios are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.

⁴

AAD 2022M measure ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production using 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. See their Fig. 14. The signal strengths and 95$\%$ CL cross section upper limits with simplified template cross section bins are given in their Figs. 18 and 19, respectively.

⁵	AAD 2020Z measure $\sigma _{ {{\mathit t}} {{\overline{\mathit t}}} {{\mathit H}} }$ $\cdot{}$B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ ) to be $1.64$ ${}^{+0.38}_{-0.36}{}^{+0.17}_{-0.14}$ fb in 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.

⁶	SIRUNYAN 2020AS measure $\sigma _{ {{\mathit t}} {{\overline{\mathit t}}} {{\mathit H}} }\cdot{}$B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ ) to be $1.56$ ${}^{+0.34}_{-0.32}$ fb in 137 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.

⁷

SIRUNYAN 2019R search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

⁸

AABOUD 2018AC search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ( $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ , ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ ), ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ ( $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ , ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ ) in 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. See their Table 13 and Fig. 13.

⁹

AABOUD 2018BK use 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$ data for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$, ${{\mathit \mu}}$) and 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ for other decay channels at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. A significance of 5.8 standard deviations is observed for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and its signal strength without the uncertainty of the ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ cross section is $1.32$ ${}^{+0.28}_{-0.26}$. Combining with results of 7 and 8 TeV (AAD 2016K), the significance is 6.3 standard deviations. Assuming Standard Model branching fractions, the total ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production cross section at 13 TeV is measured to be $670$ $\pm90$ ${}^{+110}_{-100}$ fb.

¹⁰

AABOUD 2018T search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

¹¹

SIRUNYAN 2018BD search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ , ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in the all-jet final state with 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

¹²

SIRUNYAN 2018BQ search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ in final states with electrons, muons and hadronically decaying ${{\mathit \tau}}$ leptons ( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ ) with 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 3.2 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

¹³

SIRUNYAN 2018L use up to 5.1, 19.7 and 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7, 8, and 13 TeV, respectively. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 5.2 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. ${{\mathit H}}$ decay channels of ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ are used. See their Table 1 and Fig. 2 for results on individual channels.

¹⁴

AAD 2016AL search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ in 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , and ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. This paper combines the results of previous papers, and the new result of this paper only is: ${{\mathit \mu}}$ = $1.6$ $\pm2.6$.

¹⁵	AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV.

¹⁶

AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The third uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.

¹⁷

AAD 2015 search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ in 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted result on the signal strength is equivalent to an upper limit of 6.7 at 95$\%$ CL and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.4 GeV.

¹⁸

AAD 2015BC search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The corresponding upper limit is 3.4 at 95$\%$ CL. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

¹⁹

AAD 2015T search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ resulting in multilepton final states (mainly from ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ ) in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted result on the signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV and corresponds to an upper limit of 4.7 at 95$\%$ CL. The data sample is independent from AAD 2015 and AAD 2015BC.

²⁰

KHACHATRYAN 2015AN search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in 19.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted result on the signal strength is equivalent to an upper limit of 4.2 at 95$\%$ CL and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

²¹

KHACHATRYAN 2014H search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production with ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ , ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ , and ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ , in 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.6 GeV.

²²	AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

²³

CHATRCHYAN 2013X search for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production followed by ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , one top decaying to ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ and the other to either ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ or ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ in 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. A limit on cross section times branching ratio which corresponds to ($4.0 - 8.6$) times the expected Standard Model cross section is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = $110 - 140$ GeV at 95$\%$ CL. The quoted limit is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV, where 5.2 is expected for no signal.

References:

2022M

JHEP 2206 097

Measurement of Higgs boson decay into $b$-quarks in associated production with a top-quark pair in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

2021R

EPJ C81 378

Measurement of the Higgs boson production rate in association with top quarks in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying tau leptons at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

2020Z

PRL 125 061802

$CP$ Properties of Higgs Boson Interactions with Top Quarks in the $t\bar{t}H$ and $tH$ Processes Using $H \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ with the ATLAS Detector

2020AS

PRL 125 061801

Measurements of $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$H production and the CP structure of the Yukawa interaction between the Higgs boson and top quark in the diphoton decay channel

2019R

JHEP 1903 026

Search for $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}\mathrm{H} $ production in the $ \mathrm{H}\to \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}} $ decay channel with leptonic $ \mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}} $ decays in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=13 $ TeV

2018AC

PR D97 072003

Evidence for the associated production of the Higgs boson and a top quark pair with the ATLAS detector

2018T

PR D97 072016

Search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying into a $b\bar{b}$ pair in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13??TeV with the ATLAS detector

2018BK

PL B784 173

Observation of Higgs boson production in association with a top quark pair at the LHC with the ATLAS detector

2018BQ

JHEP 1808 066

Evidence for associated production of a Higgs boson with a top quark pair in final states with electrons, muons, and hadronically decaying $\tau$ leptons at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

2018BD

JHEP 1806 101

Search for $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}$H production in the all-jet final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

2018L

PRL 120 231801

Observation of $\mathrm{t\overline{t}}$H production

2016AN

JHEP 1608 045

Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Constraints on its Couplings from a Combined ATLAS and CMS Analysis of the LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ =7 and 8 TeV

2016AL

JHEP 1605 160

Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying into ${\mathit {\mathit b}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit b}}}$ Produced in Association with Top Quarks Decaying Hadronically in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector

2016K

EPJ C76 6

Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Coupling Strengths using ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS Experiment

2015BC

EPJ C75 349

Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson Produced in Association with Top Quarks and Decaying into ${\mathit {\mathit b}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector

PL B740 222

Search for ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ Produced in Association with Top Quarks and Constraints on the Yukawa Coupling between the Top Quark and the Higgs Boson using Data Taken at 7 TeV and 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector

2015T

PL B749 519

Search for the Associated Production of the Higgs Boson with a Top Quark Pair in Multilepton Final States with the ATLAS Detector

2015AN

EPJ C75 251

Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson Produced in Association with a Top-Quark Pair and Decaying to Bottom Quarks Using a Matrix Element Method