pdgLive Home   >   BOTTOM BARYONS ($\mathit B$ = $-1$)   >   ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$   >   ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$ MASS

${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$ MASS

INSPIRE   PDGID:

B163M

VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT $\bf{ 5920.09 \pm0.17}$ OUR AVERAGE $5920.09 \pm0.02 \pm0.17$ 1 AAIJ 2020 Q LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV $5920.16 \pm0.07 \pm0.17$ 2 SIRUNYAN 2020 K CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 13 TeV • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • $5919.4 \pm0.5 \pm0.2$ 3, 4 AALTONEN 2013 V CDF ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ at 1.96 TeV $5920.00 \pm0.09 \pm0.17$ 5, 6 AAIJ 2012 AL LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2020Q 1  AAIJ 2020Q measures $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$) $−$ $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}$) = $300.492$ $\pm0.019$ $\pm0.010$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}$) = $5619.60$ $\pm0.17$ (MeV). Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values. 2  SIRUNYAN 2020K measures $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$) $−$ $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}$) = $300.56$ $\pm0.07$ $\pm0.01$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}$) = $5619.60$ $\pm0.17$ (MeV). Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values. 3  Measured in ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ decays with $17.3$ ${}^{+5.3}_{-4.6}$ events, with a significance of 3.5 sigma. 4  AALTONEN 2013V measures $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}})−\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}})−2\mathit m({{\mathit \pi}}$) = $20.68$ $\pm0.35$ $\pm0.30$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}$) = $5619.60$ $\pm0.17$ (MeV) and $\mathit m({{\mathit \pi}}$) = $139.57039$ $\pm0.00018$ (MeV). Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values. 5  Observed in ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ decays with $52.5$ $\pm8.1$ candidates with a significance of 10.2 sigma. 6  AAIJ 2012AL measures $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}{(5920)}^{0}}$) $−$ $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}$) = $300.40$ $\pm0.08$ $\pm0.04$ MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of $\mathit m({{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{b}}}^{0}}$) = $5619.60$ $\pm0.17$ (MeV). Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.

References