${{\boldsymbol \rho}_{{3}}{(1690)}}$ MASS

${{\boldsymbol K}}{{\overline{\boldsymbol K}}}$ AND ${{\boldsymbol K}}{{\overline{\boldsymbol K}}}{{\boldsymbol \pi}}$ MODES INSPIRE search

VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG  COMMENT
$\bf{ 1696 \pm4}$ OUR AVERAGE
$1699$ $\pm5$
ALPER
1980
CNTR 0 62 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit n}}$
$1698$ $\pm12$ 6k 1, 2
MARTIN
1978D
SPEC 10 ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit p}}$
$1692$ $\pm6$
BLUM
1975
ASPK 0 18.4 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit n}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$
$1690$ $\pm16$
ADERHOLZ
1969
HBC + 8 ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}}{{\overline{\mathit K}}}{{\mathit \pi}}$
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
$1694$ $\pm8$ 3
COSTA
1980
OMEG 10 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit n}}$
1  From a fit to $\mathit J{}^{P} = 3{}^{-}$ partial wave.
2  Systematic error on mass scale subtracted.
3  They cannot distinguish between ${{\mathit \rho}_{{3}}{(1690)}}$ and ${{\mathit \omega}_{{3}}{(1670)}}$.
  References:
ALPER 1980
PL 94B 422 Evidence for a Spin-5 Boson Resonance at 2300 MeV
COSTA 1980
NP B175 402 An Amplitude Analysis of the ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ System Produced in the Reaction ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit n}}$ at 10 ${\mathrm {GeV/}}\mathit c$
MARTIN 1978D
PL 74B 417 A Study of Isospin = 1 Meson States using 10 ${\mathrm {GeV/}}\mathit c$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{0}}$ Production Data
BLUM 1975
PL 57B 403 Evidence for a Spin-4 Boson Resonance at 2050 MeV
ADERHOLZ 1969
NP B11 259 Strange Particle Production in 8 ${\mathrm {GeV/}}\mathit c$ Positive Pion Interactions in Hydrogen