$\vert{}{\boldsymbol m}_{{{\boldsymbol D}_{{1}}^{0}}}–{\boldsymbol m}_{{{\boldsymbol D}_{{2}}^{0}}}\vert{}$ = $x$ $\Gamma $ INSPIRE search

The ${{\mathit D}_{{1}}^{0}}$ and ${{\mathit D}_{{2}}^{0}}$ are the mass eigenstates of the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ meson, as described in the note on ``${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing,' above. The experiments usually present $x$ ${}\equiv$ $\Delta \mathit m/\Gamma $. Then $\Delta \mathit m$ = $x$ $\Gamma $ = $x$ $\hbar{}/\tau $.

``OUR EVALUATION'' comes from CPV allowing averages provided by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, see the note on ``${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing.''
VALUE ($ 10^{10} $ $\hbar{}$ s${}^{-1}$) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 0.95 {}^{+0.41}_{-0.44}}$ OUR EVALUATION
$\bf{ 0.8 \pm0.7}$ OUR AVERAGE  Error includes scale factor of 1.7.
1
AAIJ
2018K
LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
$-2.10$ $\pm1.29$ $\pm0.41$ 2
AAIJ
2016V
LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7 TeV
$3.7$ $\pm2.9$ $\pm1.5$ 3
LEES
2016D
BABR ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ , 10.6 GeV
4
KO
2014
BELL ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Upsilon}{(nS)}}$
$1.37$ $\pm0.46$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.28}$ 5
PENG
2014
BELL ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Upsilon}{(nS)}}$
6
AALTONEN
2013AE
CDF ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ at 1.96 TeV
$0.39$ $\pm0.56$ $\pm0.35$ 7
DEL-AMO-SANCH..
2010D
BABR ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ , 10.6 GeV
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
8
AAIJ
2017AO
LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2018K
9
AAIJ
2013CE
LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2017AO
10
AAIJ
2013N
LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2013CE
$6.4$ ${}^{+1.4}_{-1.7}$ $\pm1.0$ 11
AUBERT
2009AN
BABR ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ at 10.58 GeV
$-2$ ${}^{+7}_{-6}$ 12
LOWREY
2009
CLEO ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ at ${{\mathit \psi}{(3770)}}$
$1.98$ $\pm0.73$ ${}^{+0.32}_{-0.41}$ 13
ZHANG
2007B
BELL Repl. by PENG 2014
$<7$ 95 14
ZHANG
2006
BELL ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$
$-11\text{ to }+22 $ 13
ASNER
2005
CLEO ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\approx{}$ 10 GeV
$<11$ 90
BITENC
2005
BELL
$<30$ 90
CAWLFIELD
2005
CLEO
$<7$ 95 14
LI
2005A
BELL See ZHANG 2006
$<22$ 95 15
LINK
2005H
FOCS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ nucleus
$<23$ 95
AUBERT
2004Q
BABR
$<11$ 95 14
AUBERT
2003Z
BABR ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ , 10.6~GeV
$<7$ 95 16
GODANG
2000
CLE2 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$
$<32$ 90 17, 18
AITALA
1998
E791 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ nucleus, 500 GeV
$<24$ 90 19
AITALA
1996C
E791 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ nucleus, 500 GeV
$<21$ 90 18, 20
ANJOS
1988C
E691 Photoproduction
1  The result was established with ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ from prompt and secondary ${{\mathit D}^{*}}$. Based on 5 fb${}^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7, 8, 13 TeV. Assumes no $\mathit CP$ violation. Reported ${{\mathit x}^{'2}}$ = ($3.9$ $\pm2.7$) $ \times 10^{-5}$ and ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = $0.00528$ $\pm0.00052$, where ${{\mathit x}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit x}}$ cos($\delta $) + ${{\mathit y}}$ sin($\delta $), ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit y}}$
2  Model-independent measurement of the charm mixing parameters in the decay ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ using 1.0 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of LHCb data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV.
3  Time-dependent amplitude analysis of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ .
4  Based on 976 fb${}^{-1}$ of data collected at ${{\mathit Y}{(nS)}}$ resonances. Assumes no $\mathit CP$ violation. Reported ${{\mathit x}^{'2}}$ = $0.00009$ $\pm0.00022$ and ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = $0.0046$ $\pm0.0034$, where ${{\mathit x}^{\,'}}$ = x$~$cos($\delta $) + y$~$sin($\delta $), ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = y$~$cos($\delta $) $−$ x$~$sin($\delta $) and $\delta $ is the strong phase between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ .
5  The time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ is emplored. Decay-time information and interference on the Dalitz plot are used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing and to measure the relative phase between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{*+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{*+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ . This value allows $\mathit CP$ violation and is sensitive to the sign of $\Delta \mathit m$.
6  Based on 9.6 fb${}^{-1}$ of data collected at the Tevatron. Assumes no $\mathit CP$ violation. Reported ${{\mathit x}^{'2}}$ = $0.00008$ $\pm0.00018$ and ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = $0.0043$ $\pm0.0043$, where ${{\mathit x}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit x}}$ cos($\delta $) + ${{\mathit y}}$ sin($\delta $), ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit y}}$ cos($\delta $) $−$ ${{\mathit x}}$ sin($\delta $) and $\delta $ is the strong phase between the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ .
7  DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010D uses 540,800$\pm800$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and 79,900$\pm300$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ events in a time-dependent amplitude analysis of the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Dalitz plots. No evidence was found for $\mathit CP$ violation, and the values here assume no such violation.
8  The result was established with ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ from prompt and secondary ${{\mathit D}^{*}}$. Based on 3 fb${}^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7, 8 TeV. Assumes no $\mathit CP$ violation. Reported ${{\mathit x}^{'2}}$ = ($3.6$ $\pm4.3$) $ \times 10^{-5}$ and ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = $0.00523$ $\pm0.00084$, where ${{\mathit x}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit x}}$ cos($\delta $) + ${{\mathit y}}$ sin($\delta $), ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit y}}$ cos($\delta $) $−$ ${{\mathit x}}$ sin($\delta $) and $\delta $ is the strong phase between the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ .
9  Based on 3 fb${}^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7, 8 TeV. Assumes no $\mathit CP$ violation. Reported ${{\mathit x}^{'2}}$ = ($5.5$ $\pm4.9$) $ \times 10^{-4}$ and ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = $0.0048$ $\pm0.0010$, where ${{\mathit x}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit x}}$ cos($\delta $) + ${{\mathit y}}$ sin($\delta $), ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit y}}$ cos($\delta $) $−$ ${{\mathit x}}$ sin($\delta $) and $\delta $ is the strong phase between the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ .
10  Based on 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV in 2011. Assumes no $\mathit CP$ violation. Reported ${{\mathit x}^{'2}}$ = ($-0.9$ $\pm1.3$) $ \times 10^{-4}$ and ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = $0.0072$ $\pm0.0024$, where ${{\mathit x}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit x}}$ cos($\delta $) + ${{\mathit y}}$ sin($\delta $), ${{\mathit y}^{\,'}}$ = ${{\mathit y}}$ cos($\delta $) $−$ ${{\mathit x}}$ sin($\delta $) and $\delta $ is the strong phase between the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ .
11  The AUBERT 2009AN values are inferred from the branching ratio given near the end of this Listings. Mixing is distinguished from DCS decays using decay-time information. Interference between mixing and DCS is allowed. The phase between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ is assumed to be small. The width difference here is ${{\mathit y}^{''}}$, which is not the same as ${{\mathit y}_{{CP}}}$ in the note on ${{\mathit D}^{0}}--{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing.
12  LOWREY 2009 uses quantum correlations in ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{0}}{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ at the ${{\mathit \psi}{(3770)}}$. See below for coherence factors and average relative strong phases for both ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ and ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$2 ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ . A fit that includes external measurements of charm mixing parameters gets $\Delta \mathit m$ = ($23.4$ $\pm6.1$) $ \times 10^{9}$ $\hbar{}~$s${}^{-1}$.
13  The ASNER 2005 and ZHANG 2007B values are from the time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ . Decay-time information and interference on the Dalitz plot are used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing and to measure the relative phase between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{*+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{*+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ . This value allows $\mathit CP$ violation and is sensitive to the sign of $\Delta \mathit m$.
14  The AUBERT 2003Z, LI 2005A, and ZHANG 2006 limits are inferred from the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing ratio $\Gamma\mathrm {( {{\mathit K}^{+}} {{\mathit \pi}^{-}} (via {{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}))}/\Gamma\mathrm {( {{\mathit K}^{-}} {{\mathit \pi}^{+}} )}$ given near the end of this ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ Listings. Decay-time information is used to distinguish DCS decays from ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing. The limit allows interference between the DCS and mixing ratios, and also allows $\mathit CP$ violation. AUBERT 2003Z assumes the strong phase between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ amplitudes is small; if an arbitrary phase is allowed, the limit degrades by 20$\%$. The LI 2005A and ZHANG 2006 limits are valid for an arbitrary strong phase.
15  This LINK 2005H limit is inferred from the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing ratio $\Gamma\mathrm {( {{\mathit K}^{+}} {{\mathit \pi}^{-}} (via {{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}))}/\Gamma\mathrm {( {{\mathit K}^{-}} {{\mathit \pi}^{+}} )}$ given near the end of this ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ Listings. Decay-time information is used to distinguish DCS decays from ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing. The limit allows interference between the DCS and mixing ratios, and also allows $\mathit CP$ violation. The strong phase between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ is assumed to be small. If an arbitrary relative strong phase is allowed, the limit degrades by 25$\%$.
16  This GODANG 2000 limit is inferred from the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing ratio $\Gamma\mathrm {( {{\mathit K}^{+}} {{\mathit \pi}^{-}} (via {{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}))}/\Gamma\mathrm {( {{\mathit K}^{-}} {{\mathit \pi}^{+}} )}$ given near the end of this ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ Listings. Decay-time information is used to distinguish DCS decays from ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing. The limit allows interference between the DCS and mixing ratios, and also allows $\mathit CP$ violation. The strong phase between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ is assumed to be small. If an arbitrary relative strong phase is allowed, the limit degrades by a factor of two.
17  AITALA 1998 allows interference between the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed and mixing amplitudes, and also allows $\mathit CP$ violation in this term, but assumes that $\mathit A_{{{\mathit D}}}=\mathit A_{\mathit R}$=0. See the note on ``${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing,'' above.
18  This limit is inferred from $\mathit R_{\mathit M}$ for $\mathit f$ = ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and $\mathit f$ = ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ . See the note on ``${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing,'' above. Decay-time information is used to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ mixing.
19  This limit is inferred from $\mathit R_{\mathit M}$ for $\mathit f$ = ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \ell}^{-}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}$ . See the note on ``${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing,'' above.
20  ANJOS 1988C assumes that $\mathit y$ = 0. See the note on ``${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing,'' above. Without this assumption, the limit degrades by about a factor of two.

           $\vert{}{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit D}_{{1}}^{0}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit D}_{{2}}^{0}}}\vert{}$ = $x$ $\Gamma $ ($ 10^{10} $ $\hbar{}$ s${}^{-1}$)
  Conservation Laws:
$\Delta \mathit C$ = 2 VIA MIXING
  References:
AAIJ 2018K
PR D97 031101 Updated determination of $D^0$-$\overline{D}{}^0$ mixing and CP violation parameters with $D^0\to K^+\pi^-$ decays
AAIJ 2017AO
PR D95 052004 Measurements of Charm Mixing and $\mathit CP$ Violation using ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \pi}^{\mp}}$ Decays
AAIJ 2016V
JHEP 1604 033 Model-independent Measurement of Mixing Parameters in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ Decays
LEES 2016D
PR D93 112014 Measurement of the Neutral ${{\mathit D}}$ Meson Mixing Parameters in a Time-Dependent Amplitude Analysis of the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ Decay
KO 2014
PRL 112 111801 Observation of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}−{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing in ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ Collisions
PENG 2014
PR D89 091103 Measurement of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}−{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing and Search for Indirect $\mathit CP$ Violation using ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ Decays
AAIJ 2013N
PRL 110 101802 Observation of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}−{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Oscillations
AAIJ 2013CE
PRL 111 251801 Measurement of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing Parameters and Search for $\mathit CP$ Violation using ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ Decays
AALTONEN 2013AE
PRL 111 231802 Observation of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing Using the CDFII Detector
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010D
PRL 105 081803 Measurement of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing Parameters using ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ Decays
AUBERT 2009AN
PRL 103 211801 Measurement of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}−{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing from a Time-Dependent Amplitude Analysis of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ Decays
LOWREY 2009
PR D80 031105 Determination of the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ and ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ Coherence Factors and Average Strong-Phase Differences using Quantum-Correlated Measurements
ZHANG 2007B
PRL 99 131803 Measurement of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}−{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing Parameters in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ Decays
ZHANG 2006
PRL 96 151801 Improved Constraints on ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ Decays from the Belle Detector
ASNER 2005
PR D72 012001 Search for ${{\mathit D}^{0}}−{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing in the Dalitz Plot Analysis of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$
BITENC 2005
PR D72 071101 Search for ${{\mathit D}^{0}}-{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing using Semileptonic Decays at Belle
CAWLFIELD 2005
PR D71 077101 Limits on Neutral ${{\mathit D}}$ Mixing in Semileptonic Decays
LI 2005A
PRL 94 071801 Search for ${{\mathit D}^{0}}\leftrightarrow{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ Decays and Measurement of the Doubly-Cabibbo-Suppressed Decay Rate
LINK 2005H
PL B618 23 Measurement of the Doubly Cabibbo Suppressed Decay ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ and a Search for Charm Mixing
AUBERT 2004Q
PR D69 051101 Measurement of the Branching Fraction for ${{\mathit B}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{0}}{{\mathit K}^{*-}}$
AUBERT 2003Z
PRL 91 171801 Search for ${{\mathit D}^{0}}\leftrightarrow{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Nixing and a Measurement of the Doubly Cabibbo Suppressed Decay Rate in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ Decays
GODANG 2000
PRL 84 5038 Search for ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\leftrightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing
AITALA 1998
PR D57 13 A Search for ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\leftrightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing and Doubly Cabibbo Suppressed Decays of the ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ in Hadronic Final States
AITALA 1996C
PRL 77 2384 Search for ${{\mathit D}^{0}}{{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing in Semileptonic Decay Modes
ANJOS 1988C
PRL 60 1239 Study of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $−$ ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing