CHARMED MESONS
($\boldsymbol C$ = $\pm1$)
${{\mathit D}^{+}}$ = ${\mathit {\mathit c}}$ ${\mathit {\overline{\mathit d}}}$, ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ = ${\mathit {\mathit c}}$ ${\mathit {\overline{\mathit u}}}$, ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ = ${\mathit {\overline{\mathit c}}}$ ${\mathit {\mathit u}}$, ${{\mathit D}^{-}}$ = ${\mathit {\overline{\mathit c}}}$ ${\mathit {\mathit d}}$, similarly for ${{\mathit D}^{*}}$'s
INSPIRE search

${{\boldsymbol D}^{0}}$ $I(J^P)$ = $1/2(0^{-})$ 

See related review:
${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $-$ ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ Mixing
${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ MASS   $1864.83 \pm0.05$ MeV 
${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit D}^{\pm}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit D}^{0}}}$   $4.822 \pm0.015$ MeV 
${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ MEAN LIFE   $(4.101 \pm0.015) \times 10^{-13}$ s 
$\vert{}{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit D}_{{1}}^{0}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit D}_{{2}}^{0}}}\vert{}$ = $x$ $\Gamma $   $(95 {}^{+41}_{-44}) \times 10^{8}$ $\hbar{}$ s${}^{-1}$ 
${{\boldsymbol D}^{0}}$ $\boldsymbol CP$-VIOLATING ASYMMETRY DIFFERENCES
$\Delta \mathit A_{CP}$ = $\mathit A_{CP}$( ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ) $−$ $\mathit A_{CP}$( ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ )   $-0.00161 \pm0.00029$  
${{\boldsymbol D}^{0}}$ $\boldsymbol CPT$-VIOLATING DECAY-RATE ASYMMETRIES
$\mathit A_{\mathit CPT}({{\mathit K}^{\mp}}{{\mathit \pi}^{\pm}}$) in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ , ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$   $0.008 \pm0.008$  
Most decay modes (other than the semileptonic modes) that involve a neutral ${{\mathit K}}$ meson are now given as ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ modes, not as ${{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}$ modes. Nearly always it is a ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ that is measured, and interference between Cabibbo-allowed and doubly Cabibbo-suppressed modes can invalidate the assumption that 2$~\Gamma ({{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ) = $\Gamma ({{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}$).
$\Gamma_{341}$ Unaccounted decay modes $(36.9\pm{1.2})\%$S=1.1 
    constrained fit information