${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\mathit CP$-VIOLATING DECAY-RATE ASYMMETRIES

This is the difference between ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ and ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ partial widths for the decay to state ${{\mathit f}}$, divided by the sum of the widths:$
$ $\mathit A_{CP}({{\mathit f}}$) = [$\Gamma $( ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit f}}$) $−$ $\Gamma $( ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit f}}}$)] $/$ [$\Gamma $( ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit f}}$) + $\Gamma $( ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit f}}}$)].

$\mathit A_{CP}$( ${{\mathit K}_{{{1}}}^{*}{(1270)}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$) in ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_{{{1}}}^{*}{(1270)}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}$, ${{\overline{\mathit D}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ c.c.

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S032A98
Including the full ${{\mathit K}_{{{1}}}^{*}{(1270)}^{-}}$ phase space accessible in this decay chain, with its various resonance contributions.
VALUE (%) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 1.7 \pm3.5 }$ OUR AVERAGE
$3.3$ $\pm3.5$ $\pm0.5$ 163k
AAIJ
2019C
 LHCB 4-body fit, ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ evts
$-50.4$ $\pm12.0$ $\pm16.1$ 2.9k 1
DARGENT
2017
4-body fit, ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ evts
1  Obtained by analyzing CLEO data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.
Conservation Laws:
$\mathit CP$ INVARIANCE
References