pdgLive Home   >   CHARMED BARYONS ($\mathit C$ = $+1$)   >   ${{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}}$   >   ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}^{0}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{+}}}$

${{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}}–{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{+}}$ MASS DIFFERENCES

${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}{(2455)}^{0}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{{c}}}^{+}}}$

INSPIRE   JSON  (beta) PDGID:

B104D0

VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT $\bf{ 167.290 \pm0.017}$ OUR FIT $\bf{ 167.290 \pm0.022}$ OUR AVERAGE $167.29$ $\pm0.01$ $\pm0.02$ 32k LEE 01   BELL ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ at ${{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$ $167.28$ $\pm0.03$ $\pm0.12$ 15.9k AALTONEN 01 H   CDF ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ at 1.96 TeV $167.2$ $\pm0.1$ $\pm0.2$ 2k ARTUSO 00   CLE2 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\approx{}{{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$ $167.38$ $\pm0.21$ $\pm0.13$ 362 LINK 00 C   FOCS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ A, ${{\overline{\mathit E}}}_{\gamma }$ 180 GeV $167.38$ $\pm0.29$ $\pm0.15$ 143 AITALA 99 B   E791 ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit N}}$, 500 GeV $167.8$ $\pm0.6$ $\pm0.2$ ALEEV 99   SPEC ${{\mathit n}}$ nucleus, 50 GeV/$\mathit c$ $166.6$ $\pm0.5$ $\pm0.6$ 69 FRABETTI 99   E687 ${{\mathit \gamma}}{}^{}\mathrm {Be}$, ${{\overline{\mathit E}}}_{\gamma }\approx{}$ 220 GeV $167.1$ $\pm0.3$ $\pm0.2$ 124 CRAWFORD 99   CLE2 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\approx{}{{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$ $168.4$ $\pm1.0$ $\pm0.3$ 14 ANJOS 98 D   E691 ${{\mathit \gamma}}{}^{}\mathrm {Be}$ 90$-$260 GeV • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • $167.9$ $\pm0.5$ $\pm0.3$ 48 1 BOWCOCK 98   CLEO ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ 10 GeV $167.0$ $\pm0.5$ $\pm1.6$ 70 1 ALBRECHT 98 D   ARG ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ 10 GeV $178.2$ $\pm0.4$ $\pm2.0$ 85 2 DIESBURG 98   SPEC ${{\mathit n}}{}^{}\mathrm {A}$ $\sim{}$600 GeV $163$ $\pm2$ 1 AMMAR 98   EMUL ${{\mathit \nu}}{}^{}\mathrm {A}$ 1  This result enters the fit through ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}^{++}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}^{0}}}$ given below. 2  See the note on DIESBURG 1987 in the ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}^{++}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \Sigma}_{{{c}}}^{0}}}$ section below.

References

Except where otherwise noted, content of the 2025 Review of Particle Physics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The publication of the Review of Particle Physics is supported by US DOE, MEXT and KEK (Japan), INFN (Italy) and CERN. Individual collaborators receive support for their PDG activities from their respective institutes or funding agencies. © 2025. See LBNL disclaimers.