pdgLive Home   >   LIGHT UNFLAVORED MESONS ($\mathit S$ = $\mathit C$ = $\mathit B$ = 0)   >   ${{\mathit f}_{{{2}}}{(1270)}}$   >   Helicity-0/Helicity-2 RATIO IN ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit f}_{{{2}}}{(1270)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$

${{\mathit f}_{{{2}}}{(1270)}}$ $\Gamma\mathrm {(i)}{}\Gamma\mathrm {({{\mathit \gamma}} {{\mathit \gamma}})}/\Gamma\mathrm {(total)}$

Helicity-0/Helicity-2 RATIO IN ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit f}_{{{2}}}{(1270)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$

INSPIRE   JSON  (beta) PDGID:

M005HR0

VALUE ($ 10^{-2} $) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT $3.7$ $\pm0.3$ ${}^{+15.9}_{-2.9}$ UEHARA 00 A   BELL 10.6 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • $9.5$ $\pm1.8$ 1 DAI 01 A   RVUE Compilation $13$ 2, 3 PENNINGTON 00   RVUE Compilation $26$ 4, 3 PENNINGTON 00   RVUE Compilation 1  Based on a $\mathit K$-matrix analysis of BELLE data from MORI 2007, UEHARA 2008A, UEHARA 2009 and UEHARA 2013. The width is derived for the pole on the third sheet which is closest to the physical axis. 2  Solution A (preferred solution based on ${{\mathit \chi}^{2}}$-analysis). 3  Dispersion theory based amplitude analysis of BOYER 1990, MARSISKE 1990, BEHREND 1992, and MORI 2007. 4  Solution B (worse than solution A; still acceptable when systematic uncertainties are included).

References

Except where otherwise noted, content of the 2025 Review of Particle Physics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The publication of the Review of Particle Physics is supported by US DOE, MEXT and KEK (Japan), INFN (Italy) and CERN. Individual collaborators receive support for their PDG activities from their respective institutes or funding agencies. © 2025. See LBNL disclaimers.