${{\mathit N}{(1710)}}$ POLE POSITION

$-2{\times }$IMAGINARY PART

INSPIRE   PDGID:
B014IM
VALUE (MeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 80\text{ to }160\text{ }(\approx120) }$ OUR ESTIMATE
$115$ $\pm5$
ROENCHEN
2022
DPWA Multichannel
$155$ $\pm25$
ANISOVICH
2017A
DPWA Multichannel
$84$ $\pm34$ 1
ANISOVICH
2017A
L+P ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit p}}$, ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \Lambda}}$
$98$ $\pm8$ $\pm5$ 2
SVARC
2014
L+P ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$
$80$ $\pm20$
CUTKOSKY
1980
IPWA ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$169$
HUNT
2019
DPWA Multichannel
$121$
ROENCHEN
2015A
DPWA Multichannel
$170$ $\pm20$
SOKHOYAN
2015A
DPWA Multichannel
$170$ $\pm20$
GUTZ
2014
DPWA Multichannel
$159$
SHKLYAR
2013
DPWA Multichannel
$200$ $\pm25$
ANISOVICH
2012A
DPWA Multichannel
$174$ $\pm16$ 3
BATINIC
2010
DPWA ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit N}}{{\mathit \pi}}$, ${{\mathit N}}{{\mathit \eta}}$
$132$
VRANA
2000
DPWA Multichannel
$200$
HOEHLER
1993
SPED ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$
$88$
CUTKOSKY
1990
IPWA ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$
1  Statistical error only.
2  Fit to the amplitudes of HOEHLER 1979.
3  BATINIC 2010 finds evidence for a second ${\mathit P}_{\mathrm 11}$ state with all parameters except for the phase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.
References