${{\mathit N}{(1710)}}$ ELASTIC POLE RESIDUE

PHASE $\theta $

INSPIRE   PDGID:
B014IMR
VALUE ($^\circ{}$) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 120\text{ to }270\text{ }(\approx190) }$ OUR ESTIMATE
$-114$ $\pm29$
ROENCHEN
2022
DPWA Multichannel
$130$ $\pm35$
SOKHOYAN
2015A
DPWA Multichannel
$-104$ $\pm7$ $\pm3$ 1
SVARC
2014
L+P ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$
$175$ $\pm35$
CUTKOSKY
1980
IPWA ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$55$
ROENCHEN
2015A
DPWA Multichannel
$120$ $\pm45$
GUTZ
2014
DPWA Multichannel
$9$
SHKLYAR
2013
DPWA Multichannel
$120$ $\pm70$
ANISOVICH
2012A
DPWA Multichannel
$20$ 2
BATINIC
2010
DPWA ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit N}}{{\mathit \pi}}$, ${{\mathit N}}{{\mathit \eta}}$
$-167$
CUTKOSKY
1990
IPWA ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit N}}$
1  Fit to the amplitudes of HOEHLER 1979.
2  BATINIC 2010 finds evidence for a second ${\mathit P}_{\mathrm 11}$ state with all parameters except for the phase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.
References