${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}{(3090)}^{0}}$ MASS

INSPIRE   PDGID:
B176M
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 3090.15 \pm0.26}$ OUR AVERAGE
$3090.16$ $\pm0.11$ ${}^{+0.06}_{-0.10}$ $\pm0.23$ 17k 1
AAIJ
2023AS
LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
$3091.0$ $\pm1.1$ $\pm1.0$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.22}$ 41 2
AAIJ
2021AC
LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
$3089.3$ $\pm1.2$ $\pm0.2$ 87
YELTON
2018B
BELL ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ at ${{\mathit \Upsilon}{(4S)}}$
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$3090.2$ $\pm0.3$ $\pm0.5$ 2.0k 3
AAIJ
2017AH
LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
1  The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the ${{\mathit \Xi}_{{{c}}}^{+}}$ mass, taken to be the PDG 2022 fit result $2467.71$ $\pm0.23$ MeV.
2  Measured via ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{b}}}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Omega}_{{{c}}}^{**0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \Xi}_{{{c}}}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$. The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the ${{\mathit \Xi}_{{{c}}}^{+}}$ mass.
3  See AAIJ 2023AS.
References