pdgLive Home   >   STRANGE MESONS ($\mathit S$ = $\pm1$, $\mathit C$ = $\mathit B$ = 0)   >   ${{\mathit K}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(1430)}}$   >   ${{\mathit K}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(1430)}}$ MASS

${{\mathit K}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(1430)}}$ MASS

INSPIRE   PDGID:

M019M

VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT $\bf{ 1425 \pm50}$ OUR ESTIMATE • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • $1493$ $\pm4$ $\pm7$ 1 AAIJ 2023 AH LHCB ${{\mathit B}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}$( ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}$) $1449$ $\pm17$ $\pm2$ 2 LEES 2021 A BABR ${{\mathit \eta}_{{{c}}}{(1S)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \eta}^{\,'}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ $1438$ $\pm8$ $\pm4$ 5.4k 3 LEES 2014 E BABR ${{\mathit \eta}_{{{c}}}{(1S)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \eta}}/{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ $1427$ $\pm4$ $\pm13$ 4 BUGG 2010 RVUE S-matrix pole $1466.6$ $\pm0.7$ $\pm3.4$ 141k 5 BONVICINI 2008 A CLEO ${{\mathit D}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ $\sim{}\text{ 1412}$ 6 LINK 2007 FOCS ${{\mathit D}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ $1461.0$ $\pm4.0$ $\pm2.1$ 54k 7 LINK 2007 B FOCS ${{\mathit D}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ $1406$ $\pm29$ 8 BUGG 2006 RVUE $1435$ $\pm6$ 9 ZHOU 2006 RVUE ${{\mathit K}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ $1455$ $\pm20$ $\pm15$ ABLIKIM 2005 Q BES2 ${{\mathit \psi}{(2S)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ $1456$ $\pm8$ 10 ZHENG 2004 RVUE ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ $\sim{}\text{ 1419}$ 11 BUGG 2003 RVUE 11 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ $\sim{}\text{ 1440}$ 12 LI 2003 RVUE 11 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ $1459$ $\pm9$ 15k 13 AITALA 2002 E791 ${{\mathit D}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ $\sim{}\text{ 1440}$ 14 JAMIN 2000 RVUE ${{\mathit K}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit p}}$ $1436$ $\pm8$ 15 BARBERIS 1998 E OMEG 450 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}_{{{f}}}}{{\mathit p}_{{{s}}}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ $1415$ $\pm25$ 11 ANISOVICH 1997 C RVUE 11 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ $\sim{}\text{ 1450}$ 16 TORNQVIST 1996 RVUE ${{\mathit \pi}}$ ${{\mathit \pi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \pi}}$, ${{\mathit K}}{{\overline{\mathit K}}}$, ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ $1412$ $\pm6$ 17 ASTON 1988 LASS 11 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ $\sim{}\text{ 1430}$ BAUBILLIER 1984 B HBC 8.25 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit p}}$ $\sim{}\text{ 1425}$ 18 ESTABROOKS 1978 ASPK 13 ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \pi}^{\pm}}$( ${{\mathit n}}$ ,${{\mathit \Delta}}$) $\sim{}\text{ 1450.0}$ MARTIN 1978 SPEC 10 ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit p}}$ 1  From Dalitz plot analyses of ${{\mathit \eta}_{{{c}}}{(1S,2S)}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ + c.c.. 2  Using a ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}−{{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \eta}^{\,'}}$ coupled channel Breit-Wigner function. 3  Using both ${{\mathit \eta}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and ${{\mathit \eta}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$. From a likelihood scan in the presence of several interfering scalar-meson resonances with fixed width $\Gamma ({{\mathit K}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(1430)}}$) = 210 MeV. 4  S-Matrix pole. Supersedes BUGG 2006. Combined analysis of ASTON 1988, ABLIKIM 2006C, AITALA 2006, and LINK 2009 using an s-dependent width with couplings to ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ and ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \eta}^{\,'}}$, and the Adler zero near thresholds. 5  From the isobar model with a complex pole for the ${{\mathit \kappa}}$. 6  From a non-parametric analysis. 7  A Breit-Wigner mass and width. 8  S-matrix pole. Reanalysis of ASTON 1988, AITALA 2002, and ABLIKIM 2006C including the $\kappa $ with an $\mathit s$-dependent width and an Adler zero near threshold. 9  S-matrix pole. Using ASTON 1988 and assuming ${{\mathit K}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(700)}}$, ${{\mathit K}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(1950)}}$. 10  Using ASTON 1988 and assuming ${{\mathit K}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(700)}}$. 11  T-matrix pole. Reanalysis of ASTON 1988 data. 12  Breit-Wigner fit. Using ASTON 1988. 13  Assuming a low-mass scalar ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ resonance, ${{\mathit \kappa}{(700)}}$. 14  T-matrix pole. Using data from ESTABROOKS 1978 and ASTON 1988. 15  $\mathit J{}^{P}$ not determined, could be ${{\mathit K}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(1430)}}$. 16  T-matrix pole. 17  Uses a model for the background, without this background they get a mass 1340 MeV, where the phase shift passes 90$^\circ{}$. 18  Mass defined by pole position. From elastic ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}$ partial-wave analysis.

References