${{\mathit K}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(1430)}}$ WIDTH

CHARGED ONLY, WITH FINAL STATE ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \pi}}$

INSPIRE   PDGID:
M022W1
EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG  COMMENT
$\bf{ 100.0 \pm2.2}$ OUR FIT  Error includes scale factor of 1.1.
$\bf{ 100.0 \pm2.2}$ OUR AVERAGE  Error includes scale factor of 1.1.
$102.5$ $\pm1.6$ ${}^{+3.1}_{-2.8}$ 183k
ABLIKIM
2019AQ
BES $\pm{}$ ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$
$109$ $\pm22$ 400 1, 2
CLELAND
1982
SPEC + 30 ${{\mathit K}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit p}}$
$124$ $\pm12.8$ 1500 1, 2
CLELAND
1982
SPEC + 50 ${{\mathit K}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit p}}$
$113$ $\pm12.8$ 1200 1, 2
CLELAND
1982
SPEC - 50 ${{\mathit K}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit p}}$
$85$ $\pm16$ 935
TOAFF
1981
HBC - 6.5 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit p}}$
$96.5$ $\pm3.8$
MARTIN
1978
SPEC + 10 ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit p}}$
$97.7$ $\pm4.0$
MARTIN
1978
SPEC - 10 ${{\mathit K}^{\pm}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}_S^0}$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit p}}$
$94.7$ ${}^{+15.1}_{-12.5}$ 1400
AGUILAR-BENIT..
1971B
HBC - 3.9,4.6 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit p}}$
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$107$ $\pm4$ 4300 3
ABLIKIM
2022L
BES3 $2.0 - 3.08$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$
$98$ $\pm4$ $\pm4$ 25k 4
BIRD
1989
LASS - 11 ${{\mathit K}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit p}}$
1  Errors enlarged by us to 4${}\Gamma /\sqrt {\mathit N }$; see the note with the ${{\mathit K}^{*}{(892)}}$ mass.
2  Number of events in peak re-evaluated by us.
3  From a partial wave amplitude analysis at $\sqrt {s }$ = 2.125 GeV which includes all the possible intermediate states that match $\mathit J{}^{PC}$ conservation in the subsequent two-body decay. The intermediate states are parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner functions. Statistical error only.
4  From a partial wave amplitude analysis.
References
see fit info