${{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(2460)}}$0 MASS

INSPIRE   JSON  (beta) PDGID:
M119M
The fit includes ${{\mathit D}^{\pm}}$, ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit D}_{{{s}}}^{\pm}}$, ${{\mathit D}^{*\pm}}$, ${{\mathit D}^{*0}}$, ${{\mathit D}_{{{s}}}^{*\pm}}$, ${{\mathit D}_{{{1}}}{(2420)}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(2460)}^{0}}$, and ${{\mathit D}_{{{s1}}}{(2536)}^{\pm}}$ mass and mass difference measurements.
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 2460.58 \pm0.34}$ OUR AVERAGE  Error includes scale factor of 2.5.  See the ideogram below.
$2463.7$ $\pm0.4$ $\pm0.7$ 28k 1
AAIJ
2016AH
 LHCB ${{\mathit B}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$
$2464.0$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm0.5$ 2k 2
AAIJ
2015V
 LHCB ${{\mathit B}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$
$2460.4$ $\pm0.4$ $\pm1.2$ 82k
AAIJ
2013CC
 LHCB ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{*+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$
$2460.4$ $\pm0.1$ $\pm0.1$ 675k
AAIJ
2013CC
 LHCB ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$
$2462.5$ $\pm2.4$ ${}^{+1.3}_{-1.1}$ 2.3k 3
ABRAMOWICZ
2013
ZEUS ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{(*)+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$
$2462.2$ $\pm0.1$ $\pm0.8$ 243k
DEL-AMO-SANCH..
2010P
 BABR ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$
$2460.4$ $\pm1.2$ $\pm2.2$ 3.4k
AUBERT
2009AB
 BABR ${{\mathit B}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$
$2461.6$ $\pm2.1$ $\pm3.3$ 4
ABE
2004D
 BELL ${{\mathit B}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$
$2464.5$ $\pm1.1$ $\pm1.9$ 5.8k 4
LINK
2004A
 FOCS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ A
$2465$ $\pm3$ $\pm3$ 486
AVERY
1994C
 CLE2 ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ X
$2453$ $\pm3$ $\pm2$ 128
FRABETTI
1994B
 E687 ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ ${}^{}\mathrm {Be}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ X
$2461$ $\pm3$ $\pm1$ 440
AVERY
1990
CLEO ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{*+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ X
$2455$ $\pm3$ $\pm5$ 337
ALBRECHT
1989B
 ARG ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ X
$2459$ $\pm3$ $\pm2$ 153
ANJOS
1989C
 TPS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ ${{\mathit N}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ X
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$2469.1$ $\pm3.7$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.3}$ 1.5k 5
CHEKANOV
2009
ZEUS ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{(*)+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$
$2463.3$ $\pm0.6$ $\pm0.8$ 20k
ABULENCIA
2006A
 CDF 1900 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$
$2461$ $\pm6$ 126 6
ABREU
1998M
 DLPH ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$
$2466$ $\pm7$ 1
ASRATYAN
1995
BEBC 53,40 ${{\mathit \nu}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit X}},{{\mathit d}}{{\mathit X}}$
1  From the amplitude analysis in the model describing the ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ wave together with virtual contributions from the ${{\mathit D}^{*}{(2007)}^{0}}$ and ${{\mathit B}^{*0}}$ states, and components corresponding to the ${{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(2460)}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit D}_{{{1}}}^{*}{(2680)}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit D}_{{{3}}}^{*}{(2760)}^{0}}$, and ${{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(3000)}^{0}}$ resonances.
2  From the amplitude analysis in the model describing the ${{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$ wave together with virtual contributions from the ${{\mathit D}^{*}{(2007)}^{0}}$ and ${{\mathit B}^{*0}}$ states, nonresonant spin-0 and spin-1 components as well as the ${{\mathit D}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(2400)}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(2460)}^{0}}$ and ${{\mathit D}_{{{1}}}^{*}{(2760)}^{0}}$ resonances.
3  From the combined fit of the ${{\mathit M}}({{\mathit D}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$) and ${{\mathit M}}({{\mathit D}^{*+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{-}}$) distributions. and A$_{{{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}}}$ fixed to the theoretical prediction of $-1$.
4  Fit includes the contribution from ${{\mathit D}_{{{0}}}^{*}{(2400)}^{0}}$.
5  Calculated using the mass difference $\mathit m({{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}^{*0}}$) $−$ $\mathit m({{\mathit D}^{*+}})_{PDG}$ reported below and $\mathit m({{\mathit D}^{*+}})_{PDG}$ = $2010.27$ $\pm0.17$ MeV. The 0.17 MeV uncertainty of the PDG mass value should be added to the experimental uncertainty of ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.3}$ MeV.
6  No systematic error given.

           ${{\mathit D}_{{{2}}}^{*}{(2460)}^{0}}$ mass (MeV)
References