pdgLive

2020

CMS

jet mass from boosted top

$172.69$ $\pm0.25$ $\pm0.41$

ATLS

7, 8 TeV ATLAS combination

$172.26$ $\pm0.07$ $\pm0.61$

⁴

CMS

lepton+jets, all-jets channels

$172.33$ $\pm0.14$ ${}^{+0.66}_{-0.72}$

⁵

CMS

dilepton channel ( ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ , 2${{\mathit e}}$, 2${{\mathit \mu}}$)

$172.44$ $\pm0.13$ $\pm0.47$

⁶

CMS

7, 8 TeV CMS combination

$174.30$ $\pm0.35$ $\pm0.54$

⁷

TEVEWWG

TEVA

Tevatron combination

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

$172.08$ $\pm0.39$ $\pm0.82$

⁸

ATLS

${{\mathit \ell}}$ +${}\geq{}$4j (2${{\mathit b}}$)

$172.34$ $\pm0.20$ $\pm0.70$

⁹

CMS

${}\geq{}$6 jets (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)

$172.25$ $\pm0.08$ $\pm0.62$

¹⁰

2018

CMS

${{\mathit \ell}}$ +${}\geq{}$4j (2${{\mathit b}}$)

$173.72$ $\pm0.55$ $\pm1.01$

¹¹

ATLS

${}\geq{}$5 jets (2${{\mathit b}}$)

$174.95$ $\pm0.40$ $\pm0.64$

¹²

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and dilepton channels

$172.95$ $\pm0.77$ ${}^{+0.97}_{-0.93}$

¹³

CMS

${{\mathit t}}$ -channel single top production

$170.8$ $\pm9.0$

¹⁴

CMS

jet mass in highly-boosted ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ events

$172.22$ $\pm0.18$ ${}^{+0.89}_{-0.93}$

¹⁵

CMS

Dilepton channel

$172.99$ $\pm0.41$ $\pm0.74$

¹⁶

ATLS

dilepton channel

$172.84$ $\pm0.34$ $\pm0.61$

¹⁷

ATLS

combination of ATLAS

$173.32$ $\pm1.36$ $\pm0.85$

¹⁸

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2j (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)

$173.93$ $\pm1.61$ $\pm0.88$

¹⁹

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2j (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)

$172.35$ $\pm0.16$ $\pm0.48$

²⁰ ^{, 21}

CMS

${{\mathit \ell}}$ +${}\geq{}$4j (2${{\mathit b}}$)

$172.32$ $\pm0.25$ $\pm0.59$

²⁰ ^{, 21}

CMS

${}\geq{}$6 jets (2${{\mathit b}}$)

$172.82$ $\pm0.19$ $\pm1.22$

²⁰ ^{, 22}

CMS

(${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit e}}/{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \mu}})+\not E_T+{}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}},{{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}+{}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$

$173.68$ $\pm0.20$ ${}^{+1.58}_{-0.97}$

²³

CMS

semi- + di-leptonic channels

$173.5$ $\pm3.0$ $\pm0.9$

²⁴

CMS

${{\mathit t}}$ $\rightarrow$ ( ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$) ( ${{\mathit b}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit J / \psi}}{{\mathit X}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{+}}{{\mathit \mu}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$)

$175.1$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm1.2$

²⁵

2015

ATLS

small $\not E_T$, ${}\geq{}$6 jets (2${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$172.99$ $\pm0.48$ $\pm0.78$

²⁶

2015

ATLS

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and dilepton

$171.5$ $\pm1.9$ $\pm2.5$

²⁷

2015

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2j

$175.07$ $\pm1.19$ ${}^{+1.55}_{-1.58}$

²⁸

2014

CDF

small $\not E_T$, $6 - 8$ jets (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$174.98$ $\pm0.58$ $\pm0.49$

²⁹

2014

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$173.49$ $\pm0.69$ $\pm1.21$

³⁰

2014

CMS

${}\geq{}$6 jets (${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$173.93$ $\pm1.64$ $\pm0.87$

³¹

2013

CDF

$\not E_T$ + ${}\geq{}$4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 b)

$173.9$ $\pm0.9$ ${}^{+1.7}_{-2.1}$

³²

2013

CMS

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$-tag (MT2$_{(T)}$)

$174.5$ $\pm0.6$ $\pm2.3$

³³

ATLS

${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$), MT

$172.85$ $\pm0.71$ $\pm0.85$

³⁴

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$4j (0,1,2${{\mathit b}}$) template

$172.7$ $\pm9.3$ $\pm3.7$

³⁵

CDF

${{\mathit \tau}_{{{h}}}}$ + $\not E_T$ +4j (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$)

$173.18$ $\pm0.56$ $\pm0.75$

³⁶

TEVA

CDF, D0 combination

$172.5$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm1.5$

³⁷

CDF

$6 - 8$ jets with ${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$

$173.7$ $\pm2.8$ $\pm1.5$

³⁸

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2 j (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT)

$173.9$ $\pm1.9$ $\pm1.6$

³⁹

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$2j (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT+MWT)

$172.5$ $\pm0.4$ $\pm1.5$

⁴⁰

CMS

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$2j (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$), AMWT

$173.49$ $\pm0.43$ $\pm0.98$

⁴¹

CMS

${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$4j (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)

$172.4$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm1.3$

⁴²

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$172.3$ $\pm2.4$ $\pm1.0$

⁴³

CDF

Repl. by AALTONEN 2013H

$172.1$ $\pm1.1$ $\pm0.9$

⁴⁴

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and dilepton

$176.9$ $\pm8.0$ $\pm2.7$

⁴⁵

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag), $p_T({{\mathit \ell}}$) shape

$174.94$ $\pm0.83$ $\pm1.24$

⁴⁶

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$174.0$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm2.4$

⁴⁷

dilepton + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2 jets

$175.5$ $\pm4.6$ $\pm4.6$

⁴⁸

CMS

dilepton + $\not E_T$ + jets

$173.0$ $\pm0.9$ $\pm0.9$

⁴⁹

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag), ME method

$169.3$ $\pm2.7$ $\pm3.2$

⁵⁰

CDF

dilepton + ${{\mathit b}}$-tag (MT2+NWA)

$170.7$ $\pm6.3$ $\pm2.6$

⁵¹

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$174.8$ $\pm2.4$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$

⁵²

CDF

${}\geq{}$6 jets, vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag

$180.5$ $\pm12.0$ $\pm3.6$

⁵³

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + jets (soft ${{\mathit \mu}}$ b-tag)

$172.7$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm1.2$

⁵⁴

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$171.1$ $\pm3.7$ $\pm2.1$

⁵⁵

CDF

6 jets, vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag

$171.9$ $\pm1.7$ $\pm1.1$

⁵⁶

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets, ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets

$171.2$ $\pm2.7$ $\pm2.9$

⁵⁷

CDF

dilepton

$165.5$ ${}^{+3.4}_{-3.3}$ $\pm3.1$

⁵⁸

CDF

${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ ( ${{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \phi}}$ weighting)

$174.7$ $\pm4.4$ $\pm2.0$

⁵⁹

dilepton + ${{\mathit b}}$-tag (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT+MWT)

$170.7$ ${}^{+4.2}_{-3.9}$ $\pm3.5$

⁶⁰ ^{, 61}

2008

CDF

dilepton, $\sigma _{ {{\mathit t}} {{\overline{\mathit t}}} }$ constrained

$171.5$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm1.1$

⁶²

2008

${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets

$177.1$ $\pm4.9$ $\pm4.7$

⁶³ ^{, 64}

CDF

6 jets with ${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$ vtx

$172.3$ ${}^{+10.8}_{-9.6}$ $\pm10.8$

⁶⁵

CDF

${}\geq{}$4 jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$174.0$ $\pm2.2$ $\pm4.8$

⁶⁶

CDF

${}\geq{}$6 jets, vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag

$170.8$ $\pm2.2$ $\pm1.4$

⁶⁷ ^{, 68}

CDF

lepton + jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$173.7$ $\pm4.4$ ${}^{+2.1}_{-2.0}$

⁶⁹ ^{, 64}

lepton + jets

$176.2$ $\pm9.2$ $\pm3.9$

⁷⁰

dilepton (MWT)

$179.5$ $\pm7.4$ $\pm5.6$

⁷⁰

dilepton (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT)

$164.5$ $\pm3.9$ $\pm3.9$

⁷¹ ^{, 68}

CDF

dilepton

$180.7$ ${}^{+15.5}_{-13.4}$ $\pm8.6$

⁷²

CDF

lepton + jets

$170.3$ ${}^{+4.1}_{-4.5}$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.8}$

⁷³ ^{, 68}

lepton + jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)

$173.2$ ${}^{+2.6}_{-2.4}$ $\pm3.2$

⁷⁴ ^{, 75}

CDF

lepton + jets

$173.5$ ${}^{+3.7}_{-3.6}$ $\pm1.3$

⁷⁴ ^{, 61}

CDF

lepton + jets

$165.2$ $\pm6.1$ $\pm3.4$

⁷⁶ ^{, 68}

CDF

dilepton

$170.1$ $\pm6.0$ $\pm4.1$

⁷⁷ ^{, 61}

CDF

dilepton

$178.5$ $\pm13.7$ $\pm7.7$

⁷⁸ ^{, 79}

2005

6 or more jets

$180.1$ $\pm3.6$ $\pm3.9$

⁸⁰ ^{, 81}

2004

lepton + jets

$176.1$ $\pm5.1$ $\pm5.3$

⁸²

AFFOLDER

2001

CDF

lepton + jets

$176.1$ $\pm6.6$

⁸³

AFFOLDER

2001

CDF

dilepton, lepton+jets, all-jets

$172.1$ $\pm5.2$ $\pm4.9$

⁸⁴

1999

di-lepton, lepton+jets

$176.0$ $\pm6.5$

⁸⁵ ^{, 86}

1999

CDF

dilepton, lepton+jets, all-jets

$167.4$ $\pm10.3$ $\pm4.8$

⁸⁷ ^{, 86}

1999

CDF

dilepton

$168.4$ $\pm12.3$ $\pm3.6$

⁸¹

dilepton

$173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm5.5$

⁸⁸ ^{, 81}

lepton + jets

$175.9$ $\pm4.8$ $\pm5.3$

⁸⁷ ^{, 89}

CDF

lepton + jets

$161$ $\pm17$ $\pm10$

⁸⁷

CDF

dilepton

$172.1$ $\pm5.2$ $\pm4.9$

⁹⁰

BHAT

RVUE

dilepton and lepton+jets

$173.8$ $\pm5.0$

⁹¹

BHAT

RVUE

dilepton, lepton+jets, all-jets

$173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm6.2$

⁸¹

1997

lepton + jets

$186$ $\pm10$ $\pm5.7$

⁹² ^{, 87}

1997

CDF

6 or more jets

$199$ ${}^{+19}_{-21}$ $\pm22$

1995

lepton $+$ jets

$176$ $\pm8$ $\pm10$

1995

CDF

lepton $+$ ${{\mathit b}}$-jet

$174$ $\pm10$ ${}^{+13}_{-12}$

1994

CDF

lepton $+$ ${{\mathit b}}$-jet

¹	TUMASYAN 2021G based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. Events are selected by requiring 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + 2jets(1${{\mathit b}}$ jet) final state.

SIRUNYAN 2020AR based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. The products of the hadronic decay of a top quark with $p_T$ $>$ 400 GeV, in the ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets channel of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ are reconstructed as a single jet. The top quark mass is determined from the normalized differential cross section measurement in the ${\mathit m}_{\mathrm {jet}}$ distribution.

³	AABOUD 2019AC is an ATLAS combination of 7 and 8 TeV top-quark mass determination in the dilepton, lepton + jets, and all jets channels.

⁴	SIRUNYAN 2019AP based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. A combined measurement using the lepton+jets and all-jets channels through a single likelihood function. See SIRUNYAN 2018DE and SIRUNYAN 2019AP below.

⁵

SIRUNYAN 2019AR based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. Obtained from a simultaneous fit of the cross section and the top quark mass in the POWHEG simulation. The cross section is used also to extract the $\overline{\rm{}MS}$ mass and the strong coupling constant for different PDF sets.

⁶	KHACHATRYAN 2016AK based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Combination of the three top mass measurements in KHACHATRYAN 2016AK and with the CMS results at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV.

⁷	TEVEWWG 2016 is the latest Tevatron average (July 2016) provided by the Tevatron Electroweak Working Group. It takes correlated uncertainties into account and has a ${{\mathit \chi}^{2}}$ of 10.8 for 11 degrees of freedom.

⁸

AABOUD 2019AC based on 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Uses optimized event selection to suppress less-well-reconstructed events and template fits to determine ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ together with a global jet energy scale factor and a relative ${{\mathit b}}$-to-light-jet energy scale factor.

⁹

SIRUNYAN 2019AP based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. A kinematical fit is applied to each event assuming the signal event topology. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is determined simultaneously with a jet energy scale factor (JSF). The second error represents stat.+JSF. Modeling uncertainties are larger than in the measurements at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV because of the use of new alternative color reconnection models.

¹⁰

SIRUNYAN 2018DE based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is determined simultaneously with an overall jet energy scale factor constrained by the mass of the hadronically decayed ${{\mathit W}}$. Compared to the Run 1 analysis a more advanced treatment of modeling uncertainties are employed, in particular concerning color-reconnection models.

¹¹

AABOUD 2017AH based on 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Uses template fits to the ratio of the masses of three-jets (from ${{\mathit t}}$ candidate) and dijets (from ${{\mathit W}}$ candidate), to suppress jet energy scale uncertainty. Large QCD background is modelled using a data-driven method.

¹²

ABAZOV 2017B is a combination of measurements of the top quark mass by D0 in the lepton+jets and dilepton channels, using all data collected in Run I ($1992 - 1996$) at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.8 TeV and Run II ($2001 - 2011$) at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV of the Tevatron, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 0.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ and 9.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$, respectively.

¹³

SIRUNYAN 2017L based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is reconstructed from a fit to the invariant mass distribution of ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit b}}$ , where ${{\mathit p}_{{{T}}}^{miss}}$ and ${{\mathit W}}$ mass constraint are used to reconstruct ${{\mathit \nu}}$ momentum. The number of events for various contributions, except for the ${{\mathit t}}$-channel single top one, are fixed to the values extracted from simulation. Superseded by TUMASYAN 2021G.

¹⁴

SIRUNYAN 2017N based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The fully hadronic decay of a highly-boosted ${{\mathit t}}$ is reconstructed in the ${{\mathit \ell}}$+jets channel and unfolded at the particle level. The sensitivity of the peak position of the ${{\mathit m}_{{{jet}}}}$ distribution is used to test quality of the modelling by the simulation.

¹⁵

SIRUNYAN 2017O based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Analysis is based on the kinematical observables $\mathit M$( ${{\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ ), ${{\mathit M}_{{{T2}}}}$ and $\mathit M$( ${{\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ ). A fit is performed to determine ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and an overall jet energy scale factor simultaneously.

¹⁶

AABOUD 2016T based on 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The analysis is refined using the ${{\mathit p}_{{{T}}}}$ and invariant mass distributions of ${{\mathit \ell}}+{{\mathit b}}$-jet system. A combination with measurements from $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV data in the dilepton and lepton+jets channels gives $172.84$ $\pm0.34$ $\pm0.61$ GeV.

¹⁷	AABOUD 2016T is an ATLAS combination of 8 TeV top-quark mass in the dilepton channel with previous measurements from $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV data in the dilepton and lepton + jets channels.

¹⁸

ABAZOV 2016 based on 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Employs improved fit to minimize statistical errors and improved jet energy calibration, using lepton + jets mode, which reduces error of jet energy scale. Based on previous determination in ABAZOV 2012AB with increased integrated luminosity and improved fit and calibrations.

¹⁹

ABAZOV 2016D based on 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV, using the matrix element technique. Based on previous determination in ABAZOV 2011R with increased integrated luminosity. There is a strong correlation with the determination in ABAZOV 2016 . (See ABAZOV 2017B.)

²⁰	KHACHATRYAN 2016AK based on 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Combination of the three top mass measurements in KHACHATRYAN 2016AK and with the CMS results at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV gives $172.44$ $\pm0.13$ $\pm0.47$ GeV.

²¹	The top mass and jet energy scale factor are determined by a fit.

²²	Uses the analytical matrix weighting technique method.

²³

KHACHATRYAN 2016AL based on 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Determined from the invariant mass distribution of leptons and reconstructed secondary vertices from ${{\mathit b}}$ decays using only charged particles. The uncertainty is dominated by modeling of ${{\mathit b}}$ fragmentation and top ${{\mathit p}_{{{T}}}}$ distribution.

²⁴

KHACHATRYAN 2016CB based on 666 candidate reconstructed events corresponding to 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The measurement exploits correlation of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ with M( ${{\mathit J / \psi}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ ) in the same top quark decay, using a high-purity event sample. A study on modeling of ${{\mathit b}}$-quark fragmentation is given in Sec.3.3.

²⁵

AAD 2015AW based on 4.6 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Uses template fits to the ratio of the masses of three-jets (from ${{\mathit t}}$ candidate) and dijets (from ${{\mathit W}}$ candidate). Large background from multijet production is modeled with data-driven methods.

²⁶

AAD 2015BF based on 4.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Using a three-dimensional template likelihood technique the lepton plus jets (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$-tagged) channel gives $172.33$ $\pm0.75$ $\pm1.02$ GeV, while exploiting a one dimensional template method using ${\mathit m}_{ {{\mathit \ell}} {{\mathit b}} }$ the dilepton channel (1 or 2${{\mathit b}}$-tags) gives $173.79$ $\pm0.54$ $\pm1.30$ GeV. The results are combined.

²⁷

AALTONEN 2015D based on 9.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Uses a template technique to fit a distribution of a variable defined by a linear combination of variables sensitive and insensitive to jet energy scale to optimize reduction of systematic errors. ${{\mathit b}}$ -tagged and non- ${{\mathit b}}$ -tagged events are separately analyzed and combined.

²⁸	Based on 9.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Multivariate algorithm is used to discriminate signal from backgrounds, and templates are used to measure ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$.

²⁹

Based on 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. A matrix element method is used to calculate the probability of an event to be signal or background, and the overall jet energy scale is constrained $\mathit in~situ$ by ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$. See ABAZOV 2015G for further details.

³⁰

Based on 3.54 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. The mass is reconstructed for each event employing a kinematic fit of the jets to a ttbar hypothesis. The combination with the pervious CMS measurements in the dilepton and the lepton+jets channels gives $173.54$ $\pm0.33$ $\pm0.96$ GeV.

³¹

Based on 8.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with an identified charged lepton or small $\not E_T$ are rejected from the event sample, so that the measurement is statistically independent from those in the ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and all hadronic channels while being sensitive to those events with a ${{\mathit \tau}}$ lepton in the final state.

³²	Based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. CHATRCHYAN 2013S studied events with di-lepton + $\not E_T$ + ${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit b}}$-jets, and looked for kinematical endpoints of MT2, MT2$_{T}$, and subsystem variables.

³³	AAD 2012I based on 1.04 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Uses 2d-template analysis (MT) with ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and jet energy scale factor (JSF) from ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$ mass fit.

³⁴	Based on 8.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV. The JES is calibrated by using the dijet mass from the ${{\mathit W}}$ boson decay.

³⁵	Use the ME method based on 2.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV.

³⁶	Combination based on up to 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV.

³⁷

Based on 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV the quoted value is ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $172.5$ $\pm1.4$(stat)$\pm1.0(JES)\pm1.1$(syst) GeV. The measurement is performed with a liklihood fit technique which simultaneously determines ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and JES (Jet Energy Scale).

³⁸	Based on 4.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in p-pbar collisions at 1.96 TeV. The measurement reduces the JES uncertainty by using the single lepton channel study of ABAZOV 2011P.

³⁹	Combination with the result in 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of preceding data reported in ABAZOV 09AH as well as the MWT result of ABAZOV 2011R with a statistical correlation of 60$\%$.

⁴⁰	Based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Uses an analytical matrix weighting technique (AMWT) and full kinematic analysis (KIN).

⁴¹	Based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. The first error is statistical and JES combined, and the second is systematic. Ideogram method is used to obtain 2D liklihood for the kinematical fit with two parameters mtop and JES.

⁴²

Based on 3.2 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and JES combined, and the latter is from the other systematic uncertainties. The result is obtained using an unbinned maximum likelihood method where the top quark mass and the JES are measured simultaneously, with ${{\mathit \Delta}_{{{JES}}}}$ = $0.3$ $\pm0.3$(stat).

⁴³

Based on 5.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with an identified charged lepton or small $\not E_T$ are rejected from the event sample, so that the measurement is statistically independent from those in the ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and all hadronic channels while being sensitive to those events with a ${{\mathit \tau}}$ lepton in the final state. Supersedes AALTONEN 2007B.

⁴⁴

AALTONEN 2011E based on 5.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Employs a multi-dimensional template likelihood technique where the lepton plus jets (one or two ${{\mathit b}}$-tags) channel gives $172.2$ $\pm1.2$ $\pm0.9$ GeV while the dilepton channel yields $170.3$ $\pm2.0$ $\pm3.1$ GeV. The results are combined. OUR EVALUATION includes the measurement in the dilepton channel only.

⁴⁵	Uses a likelihood fit of the lepton $p_T$ distribution based on 2.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.

⁴⁶

Based on 3.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. ABAZOV 2011P reports $174.94$ $\pm0.83$ $\pm0.78$ $\pm0.96$ GeV, where the first uncertainty is from statistics, the second from JES, and the last from other systematic uncertainties. We combine the JES and systematic uncertainties. A matrix-element method is used where the JES uncertainty is constrained by the ${{\mathit W}}$ mass. ABAZOV 2011P describes a measurement based on 2.6 fb${}^{-1}$ that is combined with ABAZOV 2008AH, which employs an independent 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data.

⁴⁷	Based on a matrix-element method which employs 5.4 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Superseded by ABAZOV 2012AB.

⁴⁸	Based on 36 pb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. A Kinematic Method using ${{\mathit b}}$-tagging and an analytical Matrix Weighting Technique give consistent results and are combined. Superseded by CHATRCHYAN 2012BA.

⁴⁹	Based on 5.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The likelihood calculated using a matrix element method gives ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $173.0$ $\pm0.7$(stat)$\pm0.6(JES)\pm0.9$(syst) GeV, for a total uncertainty of 1.2 GeV.

⁵⁰

Based on 3.4 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The result is obtained by combining the MT2 variable method and the NWA (Neutrino Weighting Algorithm). The MT2 method alone gives ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $168.0$ ${}^{+4.8}_{-4.0}$(stat)$\pm2.9$(syst) GeV with smaller systematic error due to small JES uncertainty.

⁵¹

Based on 1.9 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The result is from the measurement using the transverse decay length of ${{\mathit b}}$-hadrons and that using the transverse momentum of the ${{\mathit W}}$ decay muons, which are both insensitive to the JES (jet energy scale) uncertainty. OUR EVALUATION uses only the measurement exploiting the decay length significance which yields $166.9$ ${}^{+9.5}_{-8.5}$(stat)$\pm2.9$ (syst) GeV. The measurement that uses the lepton transverse momentum is excluded from the average because of a statistical correlation with other samples.

⁵²

Based on 2.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and JES uncertainty, and the latter is from the other systematics. Neural-network-based kinematical selection of 6 highest $\mathit E_{T}$ jets with a vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag is used to distinguish signal from background. Superseded by AALTONEN 2012G.

⁵³

Based on 2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The top mass is obtained from the measurement of the invariant mass of the lepton (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$) from ${{\mathit W}}$ decays and the soft ${{\mathit \mu}}$ in ${{\mathit b}}$-jet. The result is insensitive to jet energy scaling.

⁵⁴	Based on 1.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and jet energy scale uncertainty, and the latter is from the other systematics. Matrix element method with effective propagators.

⁵⁵

Based on 943 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistical and jet-energy-scale uncertainties, and the latter is from other systematics. AALTONEN 2009K selected 6 jet events with one or more vertex ${{\mathit b}}$-tags and used the tree-level matrix element to construct template models of signal and background.

⁵⁶

Based on 1.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistical and jet-energy-scale (JES) uncertainties, and the second is from other systematics. Events with lepton + jets and those with dilepton + jets were simultaneously fit to constrain ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and JES. Lepton + jets data only give ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $171.8$ $\pm2.2$ GeV, and dilepton data only give ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $171.2$ ${}^{+5.3}_{-5.1}$ GeV.

⁵⁷

Based on 2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Matrix Element method. Optimal selection criteria for candidate events with two high $p_T$ leptons, high $\not E_T$, and two or more jets with and without ${{\mathit b}}$-tag are obtained by neural network with neuroevolution technique to minimize the statistical error of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$.

⁵⁸	Based on 2.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Mass ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is estimated from the likelihood for the eight-fold kinematical solutions in the plane of the azimuthal angles of the two neutrino momenta.

⁵⁹

Based on 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with two identified leptons, and those with one lepton plus one isolated track and a ${{\mathit b}}$-tag were used to constrain ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$. The result is a combination of the ${{\mathit \nu}}$WT (${{\mathit \nu}}$ Weighting Technique) result of $176.2$ $\pm4.8$ $\pm2.1$ GeV and the MWT (Matrix-element Weighting Technique) result of $173.2$ $\pm4.9$ $\pm2.0$ GeV.

⁶⁰

Reports measurement of $170.7$ ${}^{+4.2}_{-3.9}$ $\pm2.6$ $\pm2.4$ GeV based on 1.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The last error is due to the theoretical uncertainty on $\sigma _{ {{\mathit t}} {{\overline{\mathit t}}} }$. Without the cross-section constraint a top mass of $169.7$ ${}^{+5.2}_{-4.9}$ $\pm3.1$ GeV is obtained.

⁶¹	Template method.

⁶²	Result is based on 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and jet energy scale uncertainty, and the latter is from the other systematics.

⁶³	Based on 310 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.

⁶⁴	Ideogram method.

⁶⁵

Based on 311 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with 4 or more jets with $\mathit E_{T}>$ 15 GeV, significant missing $\mathit E_{T}$, and secondary vertex ${{\mathit b}}$-tag are used in the fit. About 44$\%$ of the signal acceptance is from ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ + 4 jets. Events with identified ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$ are vetoed to provide a statistically independent measurement.

⁶⁶	Based on 1.02 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Superseded by AALTONEN 2012G.

⁶⁷	Based on 955 pb${}^{-1}$ of data $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and JES (Jet Energy Scale) are fitted simultaneously, and the first error contains the JES contribution of 1.5 GeV.

⁶⁸	Matrix element method.

⁶⁹	Based on 425 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is a combination of statistics and JES (Jet Energy Scale) uncertainty, which has been measured simultaneously to give JES = $0.989$ $\pm0.029$(stat).

⁷⁰	Based on 370 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Combined result of MWT (Matrix-element Weighting Technique) and ${{\mathit \nu}}$WT (${{\mathit \nu}}$ Weighting Technique) analyses is $178.1$ $\pm6.7$ $\pm4.8~$GeV.

⁷¹	Based on 1.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. ABULENCIA 2007D improves the matrix element description by including the effects of initial-state radiation.

⁷²	Based on 695 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The transverse decay length of the ${\mathit {\mathit b}}$ hadron is used to determine ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$, and the result is free from the JES (jet energy scale) uncertainty.

⁷³

Based on $\sim{}$400 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error includes statistical and systematic jet energy scale uncertainties, the second error is from the other systematics. The result is obtained with the ${{\mathit b}}$-tagging information. The result without ${{\mathit b}}$-tagging is $169.2$ ${}^{+5.0}_{-7.4}{}^{+1.5}_{-1.4}$ GeV. Superseded by ABAZOV 2008AH.

⁷⁴	Based on 318 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.

⁷⁵	Dynamical likelihood method.

⁷⁶	Based on 340 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.

⁷⁷	Based on 360 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.

⁷⁸	Based on $110.2$ $\pm5.8$ pb${}^{-1}$ at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.8~TeV.

⁷⁹

Based on the all hadronic decays of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ pairs. Single ${{\mathit b}}$-quark tagging via the decay chain ${{\mathit b}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit c}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}$ was used to select signal enriched multijet events. The result was obtained by the maximum likelihood method after bias correction.

⁸⁰	Obtained by re-analysis of the lepton + jets candidate events that led to ABBOTT 1998F. It is based upon the maximum likelihood method which makes use of the leading order matrix elements.

⁸¹	Based on $125$ $\pm7~$pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ = $1.8$ TeV.

⁸²	Based on $\sim{}106~$pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$= $1.8$ TeV.

⁸³	Obtained by combining the measurements in the lepton + jets [AFFOLDER 2001 ], all-jets [ABE 1997R, ABE 1999B], and dilepton [ABE 1999B] decay topologies.

⁸⁴	Obtained by combining the D0 result ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV) = $168.4$ $\pm12.3$ $\pm3.6$ from 6 di-lepton events (see also ABBOTT 1998D) and ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV) = $173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm5.5$ from lepton+jet events (ABBOTT 1998F).

⁸⁵

Obtained by combining the CDF results of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV)=$167.4$ $\pm10.3$ $\pm4.8$ from 8$~$dilepton events, ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV)=$175.9$ $\pm4.8$ $\pm5.3$ from lepton+jet events (ABE 1998E), and ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV)=$186.0$ $\pm10.0$ $\pm5.7$ from all-jet events (ABE 1997R). The systematic errors in the latter two measurements are changed in this paper.

⁸⁶	See AFFOLDER 2001 for details of systematic error re-evaluation.

⁸⁷	Based on $109$ $\pm7~$pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ = $1.8$ TeV.

⁸⁸	See ABAZOV 2004G.

⁸⁹	The updated systematic error is listed. See AFFOLDER 2001 , appendix$~$C.

⁹⁰	Obtained by combining the ${D0}$ results of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$(GeV)=$168.4$ $\pm12.3$ $\pm3.6$ from 6 dilepton events and ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$(GeV)=$173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm5.5$ from 77 lepton+jet events.

⁹¹	Obtained by combining the ${D0}$ results from dilepton and lepton+jet events, and the CDF results (ABE 1999B) from dilepton, lepton+jet events, and all-jet events.

⁹²

Based on the first observation of all hadronic decays of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ pairs. Single ${{\mathit b}}$-quark tagging with jet-shape variable constraints was used to select signal enriched multi-jet events. The updated systematic error is listed. See AFFOLDER 2001 , appendix$~$C.

${{\mathit t}}$-Quark Mass (Direct Measurements) (GeV)

References:

TUMASYAN

2021G

JHEP 2112 161

Measurement of the top quark mass using events with a single reconstructed top quark in pp collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 13 TeV

2020AR

PRL 124 202001

Measurement of the Jet Mass Distribution and Top Quark Mass in Hadronic Decays of Boosted Top Quarks in $pp$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$??TeV

2019AC

EPJ C79 290

Measurement of the top quark mass in the $t\bar{t}\rightarrow $ lepton+jets channel from $\sqrt{s}=8$ �TeV ATLAS data and combination with previous results

2019AR

EPJ C79 368

Measurement of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}$ production cross section, the top quark mass, and the strong coupling constant using dilepton events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

2019AP

EPJ C79 313

Measurement of the top quark mass in the all-jets final state at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV and combination with the lepton+jets channel

2018DE

EPJ C78 891

Measurement of the top quark mass with lepton+jets final states using $\mathrm {p}$ $\mathrm {p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {TeV} $

EPJ C82 323 (errat.)

Measurement of the top quark mass with lepton+jets final states using $\mathrm {p}$ $\mathrm {p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {TeV} $

2017AH

JHEP 1709 118

Top-Quark Mass Measurement in the All-hadronic ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Decay Channel at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector

2017B

PR D95 112004

Combination of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ Measurements of the Top Quark Mass

2017L

EPJ C77 354

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Single Top Quark Events in Proton-Proton Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV

2017O

PR D96 032002

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dileptonic ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Decay Channel using the Mass Observables $\mathit M_{{\mathit {\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}}$, $\mathit M_{\mathit T2}$, and $\mathit M_{{\mathit {\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV

2017N

EPJ C77 467

Measurement of the Jet Mass in Highly Boosted ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events from ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV

2016T

PL B761 350

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ $\rightarrow$ dilepton channel from $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV ATLAS Data

PL B752 18

Precise Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in Dilepton Decays using Optimized Neutrino Weighting

2016D

PR D94 032004

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass Using the Matrix Element Technique in Dilepton Final States

KHACHATRYAN

2016AK

PR D93 072004

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Proton-Proton Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV

KHACHATRYAN

2016CB

JHEP 1612 123

Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Decays with a ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ Meson in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at 8 TeV

KHACHATRYAN

2016AL

PR D93 092006

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Charged Particles in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV

TEVEWWG

arXiv:1608.01881

Combination of CDF and D0 Results on the Mass of the Top Quark using up 9.7${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ at the Tevatron

2015BF

EPJ C75 330

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{+}$ and ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ $\rightarrow$ dilepton Channels using $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV ATLAS Data

2015AW

EPJ C75 158

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the Fully Hadronic Decay Channel from ATLAS Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV

2015D

PR D92 032003

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Dilepton Channel using the Full CDF Run II Data Set

2014N

PR D90 091101

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the All-Hadronic Channel using the Full CDF Data Set

2014C

PRL 113 032002

Precision Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in Lepton $+$ Jets Final States

PR D91 112003

Precision Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in Lepton+Jets Final States

2014C

EPJ C74 2758

Measurement of the top-Quark Mass in all-Jets ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV

2013H

PR D88 011101

Top-Quark Mass Measurement in Events with Jets and Missing Transverse Energy using the Full CDF Data Set

2013S

EPJ C73 2494

Measurement of Masses in the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ System by Kinematic Endpoints in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV

2012I

EPJ C72 2046

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Template Method in the ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\mathit t}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{+}$ jets Channel using ATLAS Data

2012G

PL B714 24

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the All-Hadronic Mode at CDF

2012AL

PRL 109 192001

Measurements of the Top-Quark Mass and the ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Cross Section in the Hadronic ${{\mathit \tau}}$+jets Decay Channel at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV

2012AI

PRL 109 152003

Precision Top-Quark Mass Measurement at CDF

2012AP

PR D86 092003

Combination of the Top-Quark Mass Measurements from the Tevatron Collider

2012AB

PR D86 051103

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions using Events with Two Leptons

2012BA

EPJ C72 2202

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events with Dilepton Final States in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$= 7 TeV

2012BP

JHEP 1212 105

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events with Lepton+Jets Final States in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV

2011T

PL B698 371

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Channel using the Lepton Transverse Momentum

2011E

PR D83 111101

Top Quark Mass Measurement using the Template Method at CDF

2011AC

PR D84 071105

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Channel using a Matrix Element Technique with the CDF II Detector

2011AK

PRL 107 232002

Top-Quark Mass Measurement Using Events with Missing Transverse Energy and Jets at CDF

2011R

PRL 107 082004

Precise Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel at D0

2011P

PR D84 032004

Precise Measurement of the top-quark Mass from lepton+jets Events at D0

2011F

JHEP 1107 049

Measurement of the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Production Cross Section and the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV

2010D

PR D81 032002

Measurements of the Top-Quark Mass using Charged Particle Tracking

2010E

PR D81 052011

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass and ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Cross Section in the All-Hadronic Mode with the CDFII Detector

2010AE

PRL 105 252001

Top Quark Mass Measurement in the lepton+jets Channel Using a Matrix Element Method and $\mathit in~situ$ Jet Energy Calibration

2010C

PR D81 031102

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel using $\mathit m_{T2}$ at CDF

2009X

PR D79 072005

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass at CDF using the "Neutrino ${{\mathit \phi}}$ Weighting" Template Method on a Lepton Plus Isolated Track Sample

2009O

PRL 102 152001

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass with Dilepton Events Selected using Neuroevolution at CDF

2009AK

PR D80 051104

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using the Invariant Mass of Lepton Pairs in Soft Muon ${\mathit {\mathit b}}$-Tagged Events

2009J

PR D79 072001

Top Quark Mass Measurement in the Lepton Plus Jets Channel using a Modified Matrix Element Method

2009L

PR D79 092005

First Simultaneous Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the $\mathit lepton+\mathit jets$ and Dilepton Channels at CDF

2009K

PR D79 072010

Top Quark Mass Measurement in the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ all Hadronic Channel using a Matrix Element Technique in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96$~$TeV

2009AH

PR D80 092006

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in Final States with Two Leptons

2008C

PRL 100 062005

Cross-Section-Constrained Top-Quark Mass Measurement from Dilepton Events at the Tevatron

2008AH

PRL 101 182001

Precise Measurement of the Top Quark Mass from lepton+jets Events at ${D0}$

2007D

PR D76 072009

Measurement of the ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Production Cross Section and the Top Quark Mass at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV in the All-Hadronic Decay Mode

2007I

PRL 99 182002

Precise Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Topology at CDF II

2007B

PR D75 111103

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass using Missing $\mathit E_{T}$+Jets Events with Secondary Vertex ${\mathit {\mathit b}}$-Tagging at CDF II

PRL 98 142001

Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in All-Hadronic Decays in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at CDF II

2007F

PR D75 092001

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Channel using the Ideogram Method

2007W

PL B655 7

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel

2007J

PR D75 071102

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV using the Decay Length Technique

2007D

PR D75 031105

Precision Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass from Dilepton Events at CDF II

2006U

PR D74 092005

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the lepton+jets Final State with the Matrix Element Method

2006D

PRL 96 022004

Precision Top-Quark Mass Measurement in the Lepton+Jets Topology in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$=1.96 TeV

PR D73 032003

Top Quark Mass Measurement using the Template Method in the Lepton+Jets Channel at CDF II

PR D73 092002

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Dynamical Likelihood Method using Lepton plus Jets Events with ${\mathit {\mathit b}}$-Tags in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV

2006V

PR D73 112006

Measurement of the top Quark Mass using Template Methods on Dilepton Events in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV

2006G

PRL 96 152002

Top Quark Mass Measurement from Dilepton Events at CDF II

PR D74 032009

Top Quark Mass Measurement from Dilepton Events at CDF II with the Matrix-Element Method

2005

PL B606 25

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in All-Jet Events

2004G

NAT 429 638

A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the top Quark

AFFOLDER

2001

PR D63 032003

Measurement of the top Quark Mass with the Collider Detector at Fermilab

1999G

PR D60 052001

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel

1999B

PRL 82 271

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Collider Detector at Fermilab

PRL 82 2808 (erratum)

Erratum: ABE 1999B Measurement of the top Quark Mass with the Collider Detector at Fermilab

1998F

PR D58 052001

Direct Measurement of the Top Quark Mass at ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$

1998D

PRL 80 2063

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Dilepton Events

1998E

PRL 80 2767

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass

1998F

PRL 80 2779

Measurement of the Top Quark Mass and ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Production Cross Section from Dilepton Events at the Collider Detector at Fermilab

BHAT

1998B

IJMP A13 5113

Top Quark Physics at the Tevatron

1997E

PRL 79 1197

Direct Measurement of the Top Quark Mass

1997R

PRL 79 1992

First Observation of the all Hadronic Decay of ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Pairs

1995

PRL 74 2632

Observation of the Top Quark

1995F

PRL 74 2626

Observation of Top Quark Production in ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions

1994E

PR D50 2966

Evidence for Top Quark Production in ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.8 TeV