# ${{\boldsymbol t}}$-QUARK MASS

We first list the direct measurements of the top quark mass which employ the event kinematics and then list the measurements which extract a top quark mass from the measured ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ cross-section using theory calculations. A discussion of the definition of the top quark mass in these measurements can be found in the review The Top Quark.''
For earlier search limits see PDG 1996 , Physical Review D54 1 (1996). We no longer include a compilation of indirect top mass determinations from Standard Model Electroweak fits in the Listings (our last compilation can be found in the Listings of the 2007 partial update). For a discussion of current results see the reviews "The Top Quark" and "Electroweak Model and Constraints on New Physics."

# ${{\boldsymbol t}}$-Quark Mass (Direct Measurements) INSPIRE search

The following measurements extract a ${{\mathit t}}$-quark mass from the kinematics of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ events. They are sensitive to the top quark mass used in the MC generator that is usually interpreted as the pole mass, but the theoretical uncertainty in this interpretation is hard to quantify. See the review The Top Quark'' and references therein for more information.

OUR AVERAGE of $172.76$ $\pm0.30$ (GeV) is an average of top mass measurements from LHC and Tevatron Runs. The latest Tevatron average, $174.30$ $\pm0.35$ $\pm0.54$ GeV, was provided by the Tevatron Electroweak Working Group (TEVEWWG).

VALUE (GeV) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 172.76 \pm0.30}$ OUR AVERAGE  Error includes scale factor of 1.2.
$172.69$ $\pm0.25$ $\pm0.41$ 1
 2019 AC
ATLS 7, 8 TeV ATLAS combination
$172.26$ $\pm0.07$ $\pm0.61$ 2
 2019 AP
CMS lepton+jets, all-jets channels
$172.33$ $\pm0.14$ ${}^{+0.66}_{-0.72}$ 3
 2019 AR
CMS dilepton channel ( ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ , 2${{\mathit e}}$, 2${{\mathit \mu}}$)
$172.95$ $\pm0.77$ ${}^{+0.97}_{-0.93}$ 4
 2017 L
CMS ${{\mathit t}}$ -channel single top production
$172.44$ $\pm0.13$ $\pm0.47$ 5
 2016 AK
CMS 7, 8 TeV CMS combination
$174.30$ $\pm0.35$ $\pm0.54$ 6
 2016
TEVA Tevatron combination
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
$172.08$ $\pm0.39$ $\pm0.82$ 7
 2019 AC
ATLS ${{\mathit \ell}}$ +${}\geq{}$4j (2${{\mathit b}}$)
$172.34$ $\pm0.20$ $\pm0.70$ 8
 2019 AP
CMS ${}\geq{}$6 jets (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)
$172.25$ $\pm0.08$ $\pm0.62$ 9
 2018 DE
CMS ${{\mathit \ell}}$ +${}\geq{}$4j (2${{\mathit b}}$)
$173.72$ $\pm0.55$ $\pm1.01$ 10
 2017 AH
ATLS ${}\geq{}$5 jets (2${{\mathit b}}$)
$174.95$ $\pm0.40$ $\pm0.64$ 11
 2017 B
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and dilepton channels
$170.8$ $\pm9.0$ 12
 2017 N
CMS jet mass in highly-boosted ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ events
$172.22$ $\pm0.18$ ${}^{+0.89}_{-0.93}$ 13
 2017 O
CMS Dilepton channel
$172.99$ $\pm0.41$ $\pm0.74$ 14
 2016 T
ATLS dilepton channel
$172.84$ $\pm0.34$ $\pm0.61$ 15
 2016 T
ATLS combination of ATLAS
$173.32$ $\pm1.36$ $\pm0.85$ 16
 2016
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2j (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)
$173.93$ $\pm1.61$ $\pm0.88$ 17
 2016 D
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2j (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)
$172.35$ $\pm0.16$ $\pm0.48$ 18, 19
 2016 AK
CMS ${{\mathit \ell}}$ +${}\geq{}$4j (2${{\mathit b}}$)
$172.32$ $\pm0.25$ $\pm0.59$ 18, 19
 2016 AK
CMS ${}\geq{}$6 jets (2${{\mathit b}}$)
$172.82$ $\pm0.19$ $\pm1.22$ 18, 20
 2016 AK
CMS (${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit e}}/{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \mu}})+\not E_T+{}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}},{{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}+{}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$
$173.68$ $\pm0.20$ ${}^{+1.58}_{-0.97}$ 21
 2016 AL
CMS semi- + di-leptonic channels
$173.5$ $\pm3.0$ $\pm0.9$ 22
 2016 CB
CMS ${{\mathit t}}$ $\rightarrow$ ( ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$) ( ${{\mathit b}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit J / \psi}}{{\mathit X}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{+}}{{\mathit \mu}^{-}}{{\mathit X}}$)
$175.1$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm1.2$ 23
 2015 AW
ATLS small $\not E_T$, ${}\geq{}$6 jets (2${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$172.99$ $\pm0.48$ $\pm0.78$ 24
 2015 BF
ATLS ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and dilepton
$171.5$ $\pm1.9$ $\pm2.5$ 25
 2015 D
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2j
$175.07$ $\pm1.19$ ${}^{+1.55}_{-1.58}$ 26
 2014 N
CDF small $\not E_T$, $6 - 8$ jets (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$174.98$ $\pm0.58$ $\pm0.49$ 27
 2014 C
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$173.49$ $\pm0.69$ $\pm1.21$ 28
 2014 C
CMS ${}\geq{}$6 jets (${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$173.93$ $\pm1.64$ $\pm0.87$ 29
 2013 H
CDF $\not E_T$ + ${}\geq{}$4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 b)
$173.9$ $\pm0.9$ ${}^{+1.7}_{-2.1}$ 30
 2013 S
CMS ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$-tag (MT2$_{(T)}$)
$174.5$ $\pm0.6$ $\pm2.3$ 31
 2012 I
ATLS ${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$), MT
$172.85$ $\pm0.71$ $\pm0.85$ 32
 2012 AI
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$4j (0,1,2${{\mathit b}}$) template
$172.7$ $\pm9.3$ $\pm3.7$ 33
 2012 AL
CDF ${{\mathit \tau}_{{h}}}$ + $\not E_T$ +4j (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$)
$173.18$ $\pm0.56$ $\pm0.75$ 34
 2012 AP
TEVA CDF, D0 combination
$172.5$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm1.5$ 35
 2012 G
CDF $6 - 8$ jets with ${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$
$173.7$ $\pm2.8$ $\pm1.5$ 36
 2012 AB
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2 j (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT)
$173.9$ $\pm1.9$ $\pm1.6$ 37
 2012 AB
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$2j (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT+MWT)
$172.5$ $\pm0.4$ $\pm1.5$ 38
 2012 BA
CMS ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$2j (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$), AMWT
$173.49$ $\pm0.43$ $\pm0.98$ 39
 2012 BP
CMS ${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T+{}\geq{}$4j (${}\geq{}2{{\mathit b}}$)
$172.4$ $\pm1.4$ $\pm1.3$ 40
 2011 AC
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$172.3$ $\pm2.4$ $\pm1.0$ 41
 2011 AK
CDF Repl. by AALTONEN 2013H
$172.1$ $\pm1.1$ $\pm0.9$ 42
 2011 E
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and dilepton
$176.9$ $\pm8.0$ $\pm2.7$ 43
 2011 T
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag), $p_T({{\mathit \ell}}$) shape
$174.94$ $\pm0.83$ $\pm1.24$ 44
 2011 P
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$174.0$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm2.4$ 45
 2011 R
D0 dilepton + $\not E_T$ +${}\geq{}$2 jets
$175.5$ $\pm4.6$ $\pm4.6$ 46
 2011 F
CMS dilepton + $\not E_T$ + jets
$173.0$ $\pm0.9$ $\pm0.9$ 47
 2010 AE
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$-tag), ME method
$169.3$ $\pm2.7$ $\pm3.2$ 48
 2010 C
CDF dilepton + ${{\mathit b}}$-tag (MT2+NWA)
$170.7$ $\pm6.3$ $\pm2.6$ 49
 2010 D
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$174.8$ $\pm2.4$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$ 50
 2010 E
CDF ${}\geq{}$6 jets, vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag
$180.5$ $\pm12.0$ $\pm3.6$ 51
 2009 AK
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + jets (soft ${{\mathit \mu}}$ b-tag)
$172.7$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm1.2$ 52
 2009 J
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$171.1$ $\pm3.7$ $\pm2.1$ 53
 2009 K
CDF 6 jets, vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag
$171.9$ $\pm1.7$ $\pm1.1$ 54
 2009 L
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets, ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets
$171.2$ $\pm2.7$ $\pm2.9$ 55
 2009 O
CDF dilepton
$165.5$ ${}^{+3.4}_{-3.3}$ $\pm3.1$ 56
 2009 X
CDF ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ ( ${{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \phi}}$ weighting)
$174.7$ $\pm4.4$ $\pm2.0$ 57
 2009 AH
D0 dilepton + ${{\mathit b}}$-tag (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT+MWT)
$170.7$ ${}^{+4.2}_{-3.9}$ $\pm3.5$ 58, 59
 2008 C
CDF dilepton, $\sigma _{ {{\mathit t}} {{\overline{\mathit t}}} }$ constrained
$171.5$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm1.1$ 60
 2008 AH
D0 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$ + 4 jets
$177.1$ $\pm4.9$ $\pm4.7$ 61, 62
 2007
CDF 6 jets with ${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit b}}$ vtx
$172.3$ ${}^{+10.8}_{-9.6}$ $\pm10.8$ 63
 2007 B
CDF ${}\geq{}$4 jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$174.0$ $\pm2.2$ $\pm4.8$ 64
 2007 D
CDF ${}\geq{}$6 jets, vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag
$170.8$ $\pm2.2$ $\pm1.4$ 65, 66
 2007 I
CDF lepton + jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$173.7$ $\pm4.4$ ${}^{+2.1}_{-2.0}$ 67, 62
 2007 F
D0 lepton + jets
$176.2$ $\pm9.2$ $\pm3.9$ 68
 2007 W
D0 dilepton (MWT)
$179.5$ $\pm7.4$ $\pm5.6$ 68
 2007 W
D0 dilepton (${{\mathit \nu}}$WT)
$164.5$ $\pm3.9$ $\pm3.9$ 69, 66
 2007 D
CDF dilepton
$180.7$ ${}^{+15.5}_{-13.4}$ $\pm8.6$ 70
 2007 J
CDF lepton + jets
$170.3$ ${}^{+4.1}_{-4.5}$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.8}$ 71, 66
 2006 U
D0 lepton + jets (${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$173.2$ ${}^{+2.6}_{-2.4}$ $\pm3.2$ 72, 73
 2006 D
CDF lepton + jets
$173.5$ ${}^{+3.7}_{-3.6}$ $\pm1.3$ 72, 59
 2006 D
CDF lepton + jets
$165.2$ $\pm6.1$ $\pm3.4$ 74, 66
 2006 G
CDF dilepton
$170.1$ $\pm6.0$ $\pm4.1$ 75, 59
 2006 V
CDF dilepton
$178.5$ $\pm13.7$ $\pm7.7$ 76, 77
 2005
D0 6 or more jets
$180.1$ $\pm3.6$ $\pm3.9$ 78, 79
 2004 G
D0 lepton + jets
$176.1$ $\pm5.1$ $\pm5.3$ 80
 2001
CDF lepton + jets
$176.1$ $\pm6.6$ 81
 2001
CDF dilepton, lepton+jets, all-jets
$172.1$ $\pm5.2$ $\pm4.9$ 82
 1999 G
D0 di-lepton, lepton+jets
$176.0$ $\pm6.5$ 83, 84
 1999 B
CDF dilepton, lepton+jets, all-jets
$167.4$ $\pm10.3$ $\pm4.8$ 85, 84
 1999 B
CDF dilepton
$168.4$ $\pm12.3$ $\pm3.6$ 79
 1998 D
D0 dilepton
$173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm5.5$ 86, 79
 1998 F
D0 lepton + jets
$175.9$ $\pm4.8$ $\pm5.3$ 85, 87
 1998 E
CDF lepton + jets
$161$ $\pm17$ $\pm10$ 85
 1998 F
CDF dilepton
$172.1$ $\pm5.2$ $\pm4.9$ 88
 1998 B
RVUE dilepton and lepton+jets
$173.8$ $\pm5.0$ 89
 1998 B
RVUE dilepton, lepton+jets, all-jets
$173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm6.2$ 79
 1997 E
D0 lepton + jets
$186$ $\pm10$ $\pm5.7$ 90, 85
 1997 R
CDF 6 or more jets
$199$ ${}^{+19}_{-21}$ $\pm22$
 1995
D0 lepton $+$ jets
$176$ $\pm8$ $\pm10$
 1995 F
CDF lepton $+$ ${{\mathit b}}$-jet
$174$ $\pm10$ ${}^{+13}_{-12}$
 1994 E
CDF lepton $+$ ${{\mathit b}}$-jet
1  AABOUD 2019AC is an ATLAS combination of 7 and 8 TeV top-quark mass determination in the dilepton, lepton + jets, and all jets channels.
2  SIRUNYAN 2019AP based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. A combined measurement using the lepton+jets and all-jets channels through a single likelihood function. See SIRUNYAN 2018DE and SIRUNYAN 2019AP below.
3  SIRUNYAN 2019AR based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. Obtained from a simultaneous fit of the cross section and the top quark mass in the POWHEG simulation. The cross section is used also to extract the $\overline{\rm{}MS}$ mass and the strong coupling constant for different PDF sets.
4  SIRUNYAN 2017L based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is reconstructed from a fit to the invariant mass distribution of ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit b}}$ , where ${{\mathit p}_{{T}}^{miss}}$ and ${{\mathit W}}$ mass constraint are used to reconstruct ${{\mathit \nu}}$ momentum. The number of events for various contributions, except for the ${{\mathit t}}$-channel single top one, are fixed to the values extracted from simulation.
5  KHACHATRYAN 2016AK based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Combination of the three top mass measurements in KHACHATRYAN 2016AK and with the CMS results at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV.
6  TEVEWWG 2016 is the latest Tevatron average (July 2016) provided by the Tevatron Electroweak Working Group. It takes correlated uncertainties into account and has a ${{\mathit \chi}^{2}}$ of 10.8 for 11 degrees of freedom.
7  AABOUD 2019AC based on 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Uses optimized event selection to suppress less-well-reconstructed events and template fits to determine ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ together with a global jet energy scale factor and a relative ${{\mathit b}}$-to-light-jet energy scale factor.
8  SIRUNYAN 2019AP based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. A kinematical fit is applied to each event assuming the signal event topology. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is determined simultaneously with a jet energy scale factor (JSF). The second error represents stat.+JSF. Modeling uncertainties are larger than in the measurements at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV because of the use of new alternative color reconnection models.
9  SIRUNYAN 2018DE based on 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is determined simultaneously with an overall jet energy scale factor constrained by the mass of the hadronically decayed ${{\mathit W}}$. Compared to the Run 1 analysis a more advanced treatment of modeling uncertainties are employed, in particular concerning color-reconnection models.
10  AABOUD 2017AH based on 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Uses template fits to the ratio of the masses of three-jets (from ${{\mathit t}}$ candidate) and dijets (from ${{\mathit W}}$ candidate), to suppress jet energy scale uncertainty. Large QCD background is modelled using a data-driven method.
11  ABAZOV 2017B is a combination of measurements of the top quark mass by D0 in the lepton+jets and dilepton channels, using all data collected in Run I ($1992 - 1996$) at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.8 TeV and Run II ($2001 - 2011$) at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV of the Tevatron, corresponding to integrated luminosities of 0.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ and 9.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$, respectively.
12  SIRUNYAN 2017N based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The fully hadronic decay of a highly-boosted ${{\mathit t}}$ is reconstructed in the ${{\mathit \ell}}$+jets channel and unfolded at the particle level. The sensitivity of the peak position of the ${{\mathit m}_{{jet}}}$ distribution is used to test quality of the modelling by the simulation.
13  SIRUNYAN 2017O based on 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Analysis is based on the kinematical observables $\mathit M$( ${{\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ ), ${{\mathit M}_{{T2}}}$ and $\mathit M$( ${{\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ ). A fit is performed to determine ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and an overall jet energy scale factor simultaneously.
14  AABOUD 2016T based on 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The analysis is refined using the ${{\mathit p}_{{T}}}$ and invariant mass distributions of ${{\mathit \ell}}+{{\mathit b}}$-jet system. A combination with measurements from $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV data in the dilepton and lepton+jets channels gives $172.84$ $\pm0.34$ $\pm0.61$ GeV.
15  AABOUD 2016T is an ATLAS combination of 8 TeV top-quark mass in the dilepton channel with previous measurements from $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV data in the dilepton and lepton + jets channels.
16  ABAZOV 2016 based on 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Employs improved fit to minimize statistical errors and improved jet energy calibration, using lepton + jets mode, which reduces error of jet energy scale. Based on previous determination in ABAZOV 2012AB with increased integrated luminosity and improved fit and calibrations.
17  ABAZOV 2016D based on 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV, using the matrix element technique. Based on previous determination in ABAZOV 2011R with increased integrated luminosity. There is a strong correlation with the determination in ABAZOV 2016 . (See ABAZOV 2017B.)
18  KHACHATRYAN 2016AK based on 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Combination of the three top mass measurements in KHACHATRYAN 2016AK and with the CMS results at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV gives $172.44$ $\pm0.13$ $\pm0.47$ GeV.
19  The top mass and jet energy scale factor are determined by a fit.
20  Uses the analytical matrix weighting technique method.
21  KHACHATRYAN 2016AL based on 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. Determined from the invariant mass distribution of leptons and reconstructed secondary vertices from ${{\mathit b}}$ decays using only charged particles. The uncertainty is dominated by modeling of ${{\mathit b}}$ fragmentation and top ${{\mathit p}_{{T}}}$ distribution.
22  KHACHATRYAN 2016CB based on 666 candidate reconstructed events corresponding to 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The measurement exploits correlation of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ with M( ${{\mathit J / \psi}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ ) in the same top quark decay, using a high-purity event sample. A study on modeling of ${{\mathit b}}$-quark fragmentation is given in Sec.3.3.
23  AAD 2015AW based on 4.6 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Uses template fits to the ratio of the masses of three-jets (from ${{\mathit t}}$ candidate) and dijets (from ${{\mathit W}}$ candidate). Large background from multijet production is modeled with data-driven methods.
24  AAD 2015BF based on 4.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Using a three-dimensional template likelihood technique the lepton plus jets (${}\geq{}1{{\mathit b}}$-tagged) channel gives $172.33$ $\pm0.75$ $\pm1.02$ GeV, while exploiting a one dimensional template method using ${\mathit m}_{ {{\mathit \ell}} {{\mathit b}} }$ the dilepton channel (1 or 2${{\mathit b}}$-tags) gives $173.79$ $\pm0.54$ $\pm1.30$ GeV. The results are combined.
25  AALTONEN 2015D based on 9.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Uses a template technique to fit a distribution of a variable defined by a linear combination of variables sensitive and insensitive to jet energy scale to optimize reduction of systematic errors. ${{\mathit b}}$ -tagged and non- ${{\mathit b}}$ -tagged events are separately analyzed and combined.
26  Based on 9.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Multivariate algorithm is used to discriminate signal from backgrounds, and templates are used to measure ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$.
27  Based on 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. A matrix element method is used to calculate the probability of an event to be signal or background, and the overall jet energy scale is constrained $\mathit in~situ$ by ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$. See ABAZOV 2015G for further details.
28  Based on 3.54 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. The mass is reconstructed for each event employing a kinematic fit of the jets to a ttbar hypothesis. The combination with the pervious CMS measurements in the dilepton and the lepton+jets channels gives $173.54$ $\pm0.33$ $\pm0.96$ GeV.
29  Based on 8.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with an identified charged lepton or small $\not E_T$ are rejected from the event sample, so that the measurement is statistically independent from those in the ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and all hadronic channels while being sensitive to those events with a ${{\mathit \tau}}$ lepton in the final state.
30  Based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. CHATRCHYAN 2013S studied events with di-lepton + $\not E_T$ + ${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit b}}$-jets, and looked for kinematical endpoints of MT2, MT2$_{T}$, and subsystem variables.
31  AAD 2012I based on 1.04 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Uses 2d-template analysis (MT) with ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and jet energy scale factor (JSF) from ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$ mass fit.
32  Based on 8.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV. The JES is calibrated by using the dijet mass from the ${{\mathit W}}$ boson decay.
33  Use the ME method based on 2.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV.
34  Combination based on up to 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV.
35  Based on 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at 1.96 TeV the quoted value is ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $172.5$ $\pm1.4$(stat)$\pm1.0(JES)\pm1.1$(syst) GeV. The measurement is performed with a liklihood fit technique which simultaneously determines ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and JES (Jet Energy Scale).
36  Based on 4.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of data in p-pbar collisions at 1.96 TeV. The measurement reduces the JES uncertainty by using the single lepton channel study of ABAZOV 2011P.
37  Combination with the result in 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of preceding data reported in ABAZOV 09AH as well as the MWT result of ABAZOV 2011R with a statistical correlation of 60$\%$.
38  Based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. Uses an analytical matrix weighting technique (AMWT) and full kinematic analysis (KIN).
39  Based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. The first error is statistical and JES combined, and the second is systematic. Ideogram method is used to obtain 2D liklihood for the kinematical fit with two parameters mtop and JES.
40  Based on 3.2 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and JES combined, and the latter is from the other systematic uncertainties. The result is obtained using an unbinned maximum likelihood method where the top quark mass and the JES are measured simultaneously, with ${{\mathit \Delta}_{{JES}}}$ = $0.3$ $\pm0.3$(stat).
41  Based on 5.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with an identified charged lepton or small $\not E_T$ are rejected from the event sample, so that the measurement is statistically independent from those in the ${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets and all hadronic channels while being sensitive to those events with a ${{\mathit \tau}}$ lepton in the final state. Supersedes AALTONEN 2007B.
42  AALTONEN 2011E based on 5.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Employs a multi-dimensional template likelihood technique where the lepton plus jets (one or two ${{\mathit b}}$-tags) channel gives $172.2$ $\pm1.2$ $\pm0.9$ GeV while the dilepton channel yields $170.3$ $\pm2.0$ $\pm3.1$ GeV. The results are combined. OUR EVALUATION includes the measurement in the dilepton channel only.
43  Uses a likelihood fit of the lepton $p_T$ distribution based on 2.7 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.
44  Based on 3.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. ABAZOV 2011P reports $174.94$ $\pm0.83$ $\pm0.78$ $\pm0.96$ GeV, where the first uncertainty is from statistics, the second from JES, and the last from other systematic uncertainties. We combine the JES and systematic uncertainties. A matrix-element method is used where the JES uncertainty is constrained by the ${{\mathit W}}$ mass. ABAZOV 2011P describes a measurement based on 2.6 fb${}^{-1}$ that is combined with ABAZOV 2008AH, which employs an independent 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data.
45  Based on a matrix-element method which employs 5.4 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Superseded by ABAZOV 2012AB.
46  Based on 36 pb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV. A Kinematic Method using ${{\mathit b}}$-tagging and an analytical Matrix Weighting Technique give consistent results and are combined. Superseded by CHATRCHYAN 2012BA.
47  Based on 5.6 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The likelihood calculated using a matrix element method gives ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $173.0$ $\pm0.7$(stat)$\pm0.6(JES)\pm0.9$(syst) GeV, for a total uncertainty of 1.2 GeV.
48  Based on 3.4 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The result is obtained by combining the MT2 variable method and the NWA (Neutrino Weighting Algorithm). The MT2 method alone gives ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $168.0$ ${}^{+4.8}_{-4.0}$(stat)$\pm2.9$(syst) GeV with smaller systematic error due to small JES uncertainty.
49  Based on 1.9 fb${}^{-1}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The result is from the measurement using the transverse decay length of ${{\mathit b}}$-hadrons and that using the transverse momentum of the ${{\mathit W}}$ decay muons, which are both insensitive to the JES (jet energy scale) uncertainty. OUR EVALUATION uses only the measurement exploiting the decay length significance which yields $166.9$ ${}^{+9.5}_{-8.5}$(stat)$\pm2.9$ (syst) GeV. The measurement that uses the lepton transverse momentum is excluded from the average because of a statistical correlation with other samples.
50  Based on 2.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and JES uncertainty, and the latter is from the other systematics. Neural-network-based kinematical selection of 6 highest $\mathit E_{T}$ jets with a vtx ${{\mathit b}}$-tag is used to distinguish signal from background. Superseded by AALTONEN 2012G.
51  Based on 2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The top mass is obtained from the measurement of the invariant mass of the lepton (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$) from ${{\mathit W}}$ decays and the soft ${{\mathit \mu}}$ in ${{\mathit b}}$-jet. The result is insensitive to jet energy scaling.
52  Based on 1.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and jet energy scale uncertainty, and the latter is from the other systematics. Matrix element method with effective propagators.
53  Based on 943 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistical and jet-energy-scale uncertainties, and the latter is from other systematics. AALTONEN 2009K selected 6 jet events with one or more vertex ${{\mathit b}}$-tags and used the tree-level matrix element to construct template models of signal and background.
54  Based on 1.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistical and jet-energy-scale (JES) uncertainties, and the second is from other systematics. Events with lepton + jets and those with dilepton + jets were simultaneously fit to constrain ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and JES. Lepton + jets data only give ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $171.8$ $\pm2.2$ GeV, and dilepton data only give ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ = $171.2$ ${}^{+5.3}_{-5.1}$ GeV.
55  Based on 2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Matrix Element method. Optimal selection criteria for candidate events with two high $p_T$ leptons, high $\not E_T$, and two or more jets with and without ${{\mathit b}}$-tag are obtained by neural network with neuroevolution technique to minimize the statistical error of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$.
56  Based on 2.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Mass ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ is estimated from the likelihood for the eight-fold kinematical solutions in the plane of the azimuthal angles of the two neutrino momenta.
57  Based on 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with two identified leptons, and those with one lepton plus one isolated track and a ${{\mathit b}}$-tag were used to constrain ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$. The result is a combination of the ${{\mathit \nu}}$WT (${{\mathit \nu}}$ Weighting Technique) result of $176.2$ $\pm4.8$ $\pm2.1$ GeV and the MWT (Matrix-element Weighting Technique) result of $173.2$ $\pm4.9$ $\pm2.0$ GeV.
58  Reports measurement of $170.7$ ${}^{+4.2}_{-3.9}$ $\pm2.6$ $\pm2.4$ GeV based on 1.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The last error is due to the theoretical uncertainty on $\sigma _{ {{\mathit t}} {{\overline{\mathit t}}} }$. Without the cross-section constraint a top mass of $169.7$ ${}^{+5.2}_{-4.9}$ $\pm3.1$ GeV is obtained.
59  Template method.
60  Result is based on 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is from statistics and jet energy scale uncertainty, and the latter is from the other systematics.
61  Based on 310 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.
62  Ideogram method.
63  Based on 311 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Events with 4 or more jets with $\mathit E_{T}>$ 15 GeV, significant missing $\mathit E_{T}$, and secondary vertex ${{\mathit b}}$-tag are used in the fit. About 44$\%$ of the signal acceptance is from ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ + 4 jets. Events with identified ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$ are vetoed to provide a statistically independent measurement.
64  Based on 1.02 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Superseded by AALTONEN 2012G.
65  Based on 955 pb${}^{-1}$ of data $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ and JES (Jet Energy Scale) are fitted simultaneously, and the first error contains the JES contribution of 1.5 GeV.
66  Matrix element method.
67  Based on 425 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error is a combination of statistics and JES (Jet Energy Scale) uncertainty, which has been measured simultaneously to give JES = $0.989$ $\pm0.029$(stat).
68  Based on 370 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. Combined result of MWT (Matrix-element Weighting Technique) and ${{\mathit \nu}}$WT (${{\mathit \nu}}$ Weighting Technique) analyses is $178.1$ $\pm6.7$ $\pm4.8~$GeV.
69  Based on 1.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. ABULENCIA 2007D improves the matrix element description by including the effects of initial-state radiation.
70  Based on 695 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The transverse decay length of the ${\mathit {\mathit b}}$ hadron is used to determine ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$, and the result is free from the JES (jet energy scale) uncertainty.
71  Based on $\sim{}$400 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV. The first error includes statistical and systematic jet energy scale uncertainties, the second error is from the other systematics. The result is obtained with the ${{\mathit b}}$-tagging information. The result without ${{\mathit b}}$-tagging is $169.2$ ${}^{+5.0}_{-7.4}{}^{+1.5}_{-1.4}$ GeV. Superseded by ABAZOV 2008AH.
72  Based on 318 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.
73  Dynamical likelihood method.
74  Based on 340 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.
75  Based on 360 pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV.
76  Based on $110.2$ $\pm5.8$ pb${}^{-1}$ at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.8~TeV.
77  Based on the all hadronic decays of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ pairs. Single ${{\mathit b}}$-quark tagging via the decay chain ${{\mathit b}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit c}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}$ was used to select signal enriched multijet events. The result was obtained by the maximum likelihood method after bias correction.
78  Obtained by re-analysis of the lepton + jets candidate events that led to ABBOTT 1998F. It is based upon the maximum likelihood method which makes use of the leading order matrix elements.
79  Based on $125$ $\pm7~$pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ = $1.8$ TeV.
80  Based on $\sim{}106~$pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$= $1.8$ TeV.
81  Obtained by combining the measurements in the lepton + jets [AFFOLDER 2001 ], all-jets [ABE 1997R, ABE 1999B], and dilepton [ABE 1999B] decay topologies.
82  Obtained by combining the D0 result ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV) = $168.4$ $\pm12.3$ $\pm3.6$ from 6 di-lepton events (see also ABBOTT 1998D) and ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV) = $173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm5.5$ from lepton+jet events (ABBOTT 1998F).
83  Obtained by combining the CDF results of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV)=$167.4$ $\pm10.3$ $\pm4.8$ from 8$~$dilepton events, ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV)=$175.9$ $\pm4.8$ $\pm5.3$ from lepton+jet events (ABE 1998E), and ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$ (GeV)=$186.0$ $\pm10.0$ $\pm5.7$ from all-jet events (ABE 1997R). The systematic errors in the latter two measurements are changed in this paper.
84  See AFFOLDER 2001 for details of systematic error re-evaluation.
85  Based on $109$ $\pm7~$pb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ = $1.8$ TeV.
86  See ABAZOV 2004G.
87  The updated systematic error is listed. See AFFOLDER 2001 , appendix$~$C.
88  Obtained by combining the ${D0}$ results of ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$(GeV)=$168.4$ $\pm12.3$ $\pm3.6$ from 6 dilepton events and ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$(GeV)=$173.3$ $\pm5.6$ $\pm5.5$ from 77 lepton+jet events.
89  Obtained by combining the ${D0}$ results from dilepton and lepton+jet events, and the CDF results (ABE 1999B) from dilepton, lepton+jet events, and all-jet events.
90  Based on the first observation of all hadronic decays of ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ pairs. Single ${{\mathit b}}$-quark tagging with jet-shape variable constraints was used to select signal enriched multi-jet events. The updated systematic error is listed. See AFFOLDER 2001 , appendix$~$C.
References:
 AABOUD 2019AC
EPJ C79 290 Measurement of the top quark mass in the $t\bar{t}\rightarrow$ lepton+jets channel from $\sqrt{s}=8$  TeV ATLAS data and combination with previous results
 SIRUNYAN 2019AP
EPJ C79 313 Measurement of the top quark mass in the all-jets final state at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV and combination with the lepton+jets channel
 SIRUNYAN 2019AR
EPJ C79 368 Measurement of the $\mathrm{t}\overline{\mathrm{t}}$ production cross section, the top quark mass, and the strong coupling constant using dilepton events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV
 SIRUNYAN 2018DE
EPJ C78 891 Measurement of the top quark mass with lepton+jets final states using $\mathrm {p}$ $\mathrm {p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {TeV}$
 AABOUD 2017AH
JHEP 1709 118 Top-Quark Mass Measurement in the All-hadronic ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Decay Channel at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector
 ABAZOV 2017B
PR D95 112004 Combination of ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$ Measurements of the Top Quark Mass
 SIRUNYAN 2017O
PR D96 032002 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dileptonic ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Decay Channel using the Mass Observables $\mathit M_{{\mathit {\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}}$, $\mathit M_{\mathit T2}$, and $\mathit M_{{\mathit {\mathit b}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}}$ in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV
 SIRUNYAN 2017L
EPJ C77 354 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Single Top Quark Events in Proton-Proton Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV
 SIRUNYAN 2017N
EPJ C77 467 Measurement of the Jet Mass in Highly Boosted ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events from ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV
 AABOUD 2016T
PL B761 350 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ $\rightarrow$ dilepton channel from $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV ATLAS Data
 ABAZOV 2016D
PR D94 032004 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass Using the Matrix Element Technique in Dilepton Final States
 ABAZOV 2016
PL B752 18 Precise Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in Dilepton Decays using Optimized Neutrino Weighting
 KHACHATRYAN 2016CB
JHEP 1612 123 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Decays with a ${{\mathit J / \psi}}$ Meson in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at 8 TeV
 KHACHATRYAN 2016AK
PR D93 072004 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Proton-Proton Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV
 KHACHATRYAN 2016AL
PR D93 092006 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Charged Particles in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV
 TEVEWWG 2016
arXiv:1608.01881 Combination of CDF and D0 Results on the Mass of the Top Quark using up 9.7${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ at the Tevatron
EPJ C75 330 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{+}$ and ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ $\rightarrow$ dilepton Channels using $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV ATLAS Data
EPJ C75 158 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the Fully Hadronic Decay Channel from ATLAS Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV
 AALTONEN 2015D
PR D92 032003 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Dilepton Channel using the Full CDF Run II Data Set
 AALTONEN 2014N
PR D90 091101 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the All-Hadronic Channel using the Full CDF Data Set
 ABAZOV 2014C
PRL 113 032002 Precision Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in Lepton $+$ Jets Final States
 CHATRCHYAN 2014C
EPJ C74 2758 Measurement of the top-Quark Mass in all-Jets ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV
 AALTONEN 2013H
PR D88 011101 Top-Quark Mass Measurement in Events with Jets and Missing Transverse Energy using the Full CDF Data Set
 CHATRCHYAN 2013S
EPJ C73 2494 Measurement of Masses in the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ System by Kinematic Endpoints in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV
EPJ C72 2046 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Template Method in the ${{\mathit t}}$ ${{\mathit t}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{+}$ jets Channel using ATLAS Data
 AALTONEN 2012AP
PR D86 092003 Combination of the Top-Quark Mass Measurements from the Tevatron Collider
 AALTONEN 2012AL
PRL 109 192001 Measurements of the Top-Quark Mass and the ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Cross Section in the Hadronic ${{\mathit \tau}}$+jets Decay Channel at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV
 AALTONEN 2012AI
PRL 109 152003 Precision Top-Quark Mass Measurement at CDF
 AALTONEN 2012G
PL B714 24 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the All-Hadronic Mode at CDF
 ABAZOV 2012AB
PR D86 051103 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions using Events with Two Leptons
 CHATRCHYAN 2012BP
JHEP 1212 105 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events with Lepton+Jets Final States in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV
 CHATRCHYAN 2012BA
EPJ C72 2202 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Events with Dilepton Final States in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$= 7 TeV
 AALTONEN 2011T
PL B698 371 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Channel using the Lepton Transverse Momentum
 AALTONEN 2011AK
PRL 107 232002 Top-Quark Mass Measurement Using Events with Missing Transverse Energy and Jets at CDF
 AALTONEN 2011AC
PR D84 071105 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Channel using a Matrix Element Technique with the CDF II Detector
 AALTONEN 2011E
PR D83 111101 Top Quark Mass Measurement using the Template Method at CDF
 ABAZOV 2011P
PR D84 032004 Precise Measurement of the top-quark Mass from lepton+jets Events at D0
 ABAZOV 2011R
PRL 107 082004 Precise Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel at D0
 CHATRCHYAN 2011F
JHEP 1107 049 Measurement of the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Production Cross Section and the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV
 AALTONEN 2010D
PR D81 032002 Measurements of the Top-Quark Mass using Charged Particle Tracking
 AALTONEN 2010AE
PRL 105 252001 Top Quark Mass Measurement in the lepton+jets Channel Using a Matrix Element Method and $\mathit in~situ$ Jet Energy Calibration
 AALTONEN 2010C
PR D81 031102 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel using $\mathit m_{T2}$ at CDF
 AALTONEN 2010E
PR D81 052011 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass and ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Cross Section in the All-Hadronic Mode with the CDFII Detector
 AALTONEN 2009X
PR D79 072005 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass at CDF using the "Neutrino ${{\mathit \phi}}$ Weighting" Template Method on a Lepton Plus Isolated Track Sample
 AALTONEN 2009O
PRL 102 152001 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass with Dilepton Events Selected using Neuroevolution at CDF
 AALTONEN 2009AK
PR D80 051104 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using the Invariant Mass of Lepton Pairs in Soft Muon ${\mathit {\mathit b}}$-Tagged Events
 AALTONEN 2009J
PR D79 072001 Top Quark Mass Measurement in the Lepton Plus Jets Channel using a Modified Matrix Element Method
 AALTONEN 2009L
PR D79 092005 First Simultaneous Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the $\mathit lepton+\mathit jets$ and Dilepton Channels at CDF
 AALTONEN 2009K
PR D79 072010 Top Quark Mass Measurement in the ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ all Hadronic Channel using a Matrix Element Technique in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96$~$TeV
 ABAZOV 2009AH
PR D80 092006 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in Final States with Two Leptons
 AALTONEN 2008C
PRL 100 062005 Cross-Section-Constrained Top-Quark Mass Measurement from Dilepton Events at the Tevatron
 ABAZOV 2008AH
PRL 101 182001 Precise Measurement of the Top Quark Mass from lepton+jets Events at ${D0}$
 AALTONEN 2007B
PR D75 111103 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass using Missing $\mathit E_{T}$+Jets Events with Secondary Vertex ${\mathit {\mathit b}}$-Tagging at CDF II
 AALTONEN 2007I
PRL 99 182002 Precise Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Topology at CDF II
 AALTONEN 2007D
PR D76 072009 Measurement of the ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Production Cross Section and the Top Quark Mass at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV in the All-Hadronic Decay Mode
 AALTONEN 2007
PRL 98 142001 Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass in All-Hadronic Decays in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at CDF II
 ABAZOV 2007W
PL B655 7 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel
 ABAZOV 2007F
PR D75 092001 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Lepton+Jets Channel using the Ideogram Method
 ABULENCIA 2007J
PR D75 071102 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV using the Decay Length Technique
 ABULENCIA 2007D
PR D75 031105 Precision Measurement of the Top-Quark Mass from Dilepton Events at CDF II
 ABAZOV 2006U
PR D74 092005 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the lepton+jets Final State with the Matrix Element Method
 ABULENCIA 2006V
PR D73 112006 Measurement of the top Quark Mass using Template Methods on Dilepton Events in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV
 ABULENCIA 2006G
PRL 96 152002 Top Quark Mass Measurement from Dilepton Events at CDF II
 ABULENCIA 2006D
PRL 96 022004 Precision Top-Quark Mass Measurement in the Lepton+Jets Topology in ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$=1.96 TeV
 ABAZOV 2005
PL B606 25 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in All-Jet Events
 ABAZOV 2004G
NAT 429 638 A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the top Quark
 AFFOLDER 2001
PR D63 032003 Measurement of the top Quark Mass with the Collider Detector at Fermilab
 ABBOTT 1999G
PR D60 052001 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass in the Dilepton Channel
 ABE 1999B
PRL 82 271 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Collider Detector at Fermilab
 ABBOTT 1998D
PRL 80 2063 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass using Dilepton Events
 ABBOTT 1998F
PR D58 052001 Direct Measurement of the Top Quark Mass at ${{\mathit D}^{0}}$
 ABE 1998E
PRL 80 2767 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass
 ABE 1998F
PRL 80 2779 Measurement of the Top Quark Mass and ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Production Cross Section from Dilepton Events at the Collider Detector at Fermilab
 BHAT 1998B
IJMP A13 5113 Top Quark Physics at the Tevatron
 ABACHI 1997E
PRL 79 1197 Direct Measurement of the Top Quark Mass
 ABE 1997R
PRL 79 1992 First Observation of the all Hadronic Decay of ${\mathit {\mathit t}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit t}}}$ Pairs
 ABACHI 1995
PRL 74 2632 Observation of the Top Quark
 ABE 1995F
PRL 74 2626 Observation of Top Quark Production in ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions
 ABE 1994E
PR D50 2966 Evidence for Top Quark Production in ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.8 TeV