${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit t}}$ Production Cross Section in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV

INSPIRE   PDGID:
Q007WTX
VALUE (pb) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$79.2$ $\pm0.9$ ${}^{+7.7}_{-8.0}$ $\pm1.2$ 1
TUMASYAN
2023T
CMS ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \mu}^{\mp}}$ + ${}\geq{}$1j(${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
$89$ $\pm4$ $\pm12$ 2
TUMASYAN
2021E
CMS 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets
$94$ $\pm10$ ${}^{+28}_{-22}$ $\pm2$ 3
AABOUD
2018H
ATLS ${{\mathit \ell}^{+}}{{\mathit \ell}^{-}}$ + ${}\geq{}$1j
$63.1$ $\pm1.8$ $\pm6.4$ $\pm2.1$ 4
SIRUNYAN
2018DL
CMS ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \mu}^{\mp}}$ + ${}\geq{}$1j(${{\mathit b}}$-tag)
1  TUMASYAN 2023T based on 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The result is consistent with the NNLO SM prediction. The differential cross sections are measured as a function of six kinematical variables and are consistent with the NLO SM prediction.
2  TUMASYAN 2021E based on 36 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. A boosted decision tree is used to separate the signal from the dominant ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ backgrounds. The result corresponds to an observation with a significance exceeding 5 $\sigma $ and is consistent with the NNLO QCD prediction of $71.7$ $\pm1.8$(scale)$~\pm3.4$(PDF) pb or with the approximate NNNLO SM prediction of $79.5$ ${}^{+1.9}_{-1.8}$(scale)$~{}^{+2.0}_{-1.4}$(PDF) pb.
3  AABOUD 2018H based on 3.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The last error is from luminosity. A multivariate analysis is used to separate the signal from the backgrounds. The result is consistent with the NLO+NNLL SM prediction of $71.7$ $\pm1.8$(scale)$~\pm3.4$(PDF) pb.
4  SIRUNYAN 2018DL based on 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The last error is from luminosity. A multivariate analysis is used to separate the signal from the backgrounds. The result is consistent with the NLO+NNLL SM prediction of $71.7$ $\pm1.8$(scale)$~\pm3.4$(PDF) pb.
References