${\boldsymbol m}_{{{\boldsymbol s}}}/{{\overline{\boldsymbol m}}}$ MASS RATIO
INSPIRE search
${{\overline{\mathit m}}}{}\equiv$ (${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit u}}}$ $+$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit d}}})/$2
| $\bf{
27.3 {}^{+0.7}_{-1.3}}$
|
OUR EVALUATION
|
| $27.35$ $\pm0.05$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.07}$ |
1 |
|
LATT |
| $26.66$ $\pm0.32$ |
2 |
|
LATT |
| $27.36$ $\pm0.54$ |
3 |
|
LATT |
| $27.53$ $\pm0.20$ $\pm0.08$ |
4 |
|
LATT |
| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
| $26.8$ $\pm1.4$ |
5 |
|
LATT |
| $27.3$ $\pm0.9$ |
6 |
|
LATT |
| $28.8$ $\pm1.65$ |
7 |
|
LATT |
| $27.3$ $\pm0.3$ $\pm1.2$ |
8 |
|
LATT |
| $23.5$ $\pm1.5$ |
9 |
|
THEO |
| $27.4$ $\pm0.4$ |
10 |
|
LATT |
|
1
BAZAVOV 2014A is a lattice computation using 4 dynamical flavors of HISQ fermions.
|
|
2
CARRASCO 2014 is a lattice QCD computation of light quark masses using 2 + 1 + 1 dynamical quarks, with ${{\mathit m}_{{u}}}$ = ${{\mathit m}_{{d}}}{}\not=$ ${{\mathit m}_{{s}}}{}\not=$ ${{\mathit m}_{{c}}}$. The ${\mathit {\mathit u}}$ and ${\mathit {\mathit d}}$ quark masses are obtained separately by using the ${{\mathit K}}$ meson mass splittings and lattice results for the electromagnetic contributions.
|
|
3
ARTHUR 2013 is a lattice computation using 2+1 dynamical domain wall fermions.
|
|
4
DURR 2011 determine quark mass from a lattice computation of the meson spectrum using ${{\mathit N}_{{f}}}$ = 2 + 1 dynamical flavors. The lattice simulations were done at the physical quark mass, so that extrapolation in the quark mass was not needed.
|
|
5
AOKI 2011A determine quark masses from a lattice computation of the hadron spectrum using ${{\mathit N}_{{f}}}$ = 2 + 1 dynamical flavors of domain wall fermions.
|
|
6
BLOSSIER 2010 determines quark masses from a computation of the hadron spectrum using ${{\mathit N}_{{f}}}$=2 dynamical twisted-mass Wilson fermions.
|
|
7
ALLTON 2008 use a lattice computation of the ${{\mathit \pi}}$, ${{\mathit K}}$, and ${{\mathit \Omega}}$ masses with 2+1 dynamical flavors of domain wall quarks, and non-perturbative renormalization.
|
|
8
BLOSSIER 2008 use a lattice computation of pseudoscalar meson masses and decay constants with 2 dynamical flavors and non-perturbative renormalization.
|
|
9
OLLER 2007A use unitarized chiral perturbation theory to order $\mathit p{}^{4}$.
|
|
10
Three flavor dynamical lattice calculation of pseudoscalar meson masses.
|
|
${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit s}}}/{{\overline{\mathit m}}}$ MASS RATIO
|
| References: |
|
| PR D90 074509 |
Charmed and Light Pseudoscalar Meson Decay Constants from Four-flavor Lattice QCD with Physical Light Quarks |
|
| NP B887 19 |
Up, Down, Strange and Charm Quark Masses with $\mathit N_{f}$ = 2+1+1 Twisted Mass Lattice QCD |
|
| PR D87 094514 |
Domain Wall QCD with Near-Physical Pions |
|
| PR D83 074508 |
Continuum Limit Physics from 2+1 Flavor Domain Wall QCD |
|
| PL B701 265 |
Lattice QCD at the Physical Point: Light Quark Masses |
|
| PR D82 114513 |
Average up/down, strange, and charm Quark Masses with $\mathit N_{f}$=2 Twisted-Mass Lattice QCD |
|
| PR D78 114509 |
Physical Results from 2+1 Flavor Domain Wall QCD and SU(2) Chiral Perturbation Theory |
|
| JHEP 0804 020 |
Light Quark Masses and Pseudoscalar Decay Constants from $\mathit N_{f}$ = 2 Lattice QCD with Twisted Mass Fermions |
|
| EPJ A34 371 |
Non-Perturbative Study of the Light Pseudoscalar Masses in Chiral Dynamics |
|
| PR D70 031504 |
First Determination of the Strange and Light Quark Masses from Full Lattice QCD |
|
