${{\mathit \tau}}$-DECAY PARAMETERS

$\xi ({{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$) PARAMETER

INSPIRE   JSON  (beta) PDGID:
S035XI
($\mathit V−\mathit A$) theory predicts $\xi $ = 1.
VALUE EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 0.985 \pm0.030}$ OUR FIT
$\bf{ 0.981 \pm0.031}$ OUR AVERAGE
$0.986$ $\pm0.068$ $\pm0.031$ 81k
HEISTER
2001E
ALEP 1991--1995 LEP runs
$0.929$ $\pm0.070$ $\pm0.030$ 36k
ABREU
2000L
DLPH 1992--1995 runs
$0.98$ $\pm0.22$ $\pm0.10$ 46k
ACKERSTAFF
1999D
OPAL 1990--1995 LEP runs
$0.70$ $\pm0.16$ 54k
ACCIARRI
1998R
L3 $1991 - 1995$ LEP runs
$1.03$ $\pm0.11$ 1
ALBRECHT
1998
ARG ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $9.5 - 10.6$ GeV
$1.05$ $\pm0.35$ $\pm0.04$ 2
ABE
1997O
SLD 1993--1995 SLC runs
$1.007$ $\pm0.040$ $\pm0.015$ 55k
ALEXANDER
1997F
CLEO ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $10.6$ GeV
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$0.94$ $\pm0.21$ $\pm0.07$ 18k
ACCIARRI
1996H
L3 Repl. by ACCIARRI 1998R
$0.97$ $\pm0.14$ 3
ALBRECHT
1995C
ARG Repl. by ALBRECHT 1998
$1.18$ $\pm0.15$ $\pm0.16$
BUSKULIC
1995D
ALEP Repl. by HEISTER 2001E
$0.90$ $\pm0.15$ $\pm0.10$ 3230 4
ALBRECHT
1993G
ARG ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $9.4 - 10.6$ GeV
1  Combined fit to ARGUS tau decay parameter measurements in ALBRECHT 1998, ALBRECHT 1995C, ALBRECHT 1993G, and ALBRECHT 1994E. ALBRECHT 1998 use tau pair events of the type ${{\mathit \tau}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit \tau}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow({{\mathit \ell}^{-}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{{\tau}}}})({{\mathit \pi}^{+}}{{\mathit \pi}^{0}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\tau}}}}$), and their charged conjugates.
2  ABE 1997O assume $\eta $ = 0 in their fit. Letting $\eta $ vary in the fit gives a $\xi $ value of $1.02$ $\pm0.36$ $\pm0.05$.
3  Combined fit to ARGUS tau decay parameter measurements in ALBRECHT 1995C, ALBRECHT 1993G, and ALBRECHT 1994E. ALBRECHT 1995C uses events of the type ${{\mathit \tau}^{-}}$ ${{\mathit \tau}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ (${{\mathit \ell}^{-}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{{\tau}}}}$ ) (${{\mathit h}^{+}}{{\mathit h}^{-}}{{\mathit h}^{+}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\tau}}}}$ ) and their charged conjugates.
4  ALBRECHT 1993G measurement determines $\vert \xi \vert $ for the case $\xi ({{\mathit e}}$) = $\xi ({{\mathit \mu}}$), but the authors point out that other LEP experiments determine the sign to be positive.
References