$\bf{
80.379 \pm0.012}$
|
OUR FIT
|
$80.370$ $\pm0.007$ $\pm0.017$ |
13.7M |
1 |
|
ATLS |
$80.375$ $\pm0.023$ |
2177k |
2 |
|
D0 |
$80.387$ $\pm0.019$ |
1095k |
3 |
|
CDF |
$80.336$ $\pm0.055$ $\pm0.039$ |
10.3k |
4 |
|
DLPH |
$80.415$ $\pm0.042$ $\pm0.031$ |
11830 |
5 |
|
OPAL |
$80.270$ $\pm0.046$ $\pm0.031$ |
9909 |
6 |
|
L3 |
$80.440$ $\pm0.043$ $\pm0.027$ |
8692 |
7 |
|
ALEP |
$80.483$ $\pm0.084$ |
49247 |
8 |
|
D0 |
$80.433$ $\pm0.079$ |
53841 |
9 |
|
CDF |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$80.520$ $\pm0.115$ |
|
10 |
|
H1 |
$80.367$ $\pm0.026$ |
1677k |
11 |
|
D0 |
$80.401$ $\pm0.043$ |
500k |
12 |
|
D0 |
$80.413$ $\pm0.034$ $\pm0.034$ |
115k |
13 |
|
CDF |
$82.87$ $\pm1.82$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.16}$ |
1500 |
14 |
|
H1 |
$80.3 \pm2.1 \pm1.2 \pm1.0$ |
645 |
15 |
|
ZEUS |
$81.4 {}^{+2.7}_{-2.6} \pm2.0 {}^{+3.3}_{-3.0}$ |
1086 |
16 |
|
ZEUS |
$80.84$ $\pm0.22$ $\pm0.83$ |
2065 |
17 |
|
UA2 |
$80.79$ $\pm0.31$ $\pm0.84$ |
|
18 |
|
UA2 |
$80.0$ $\pm3.3$ $\pm2.4$ |
22 |
19 |
|
CDF |
$82.7$ $\pm1.0$ $\pm2.7$ |
149 |
20 |
|
UA1 |
$81.8$ ${}^{+6.0}_{-5.3}$ $\pm2.6$ |
46 |
21 |
|
UA1 |
$89$ $\pm3$ $\pm6$ |
32 |
22 |
|
UA1 |
$81.$ $\pm5.$ |
6 |
|
|
UA1 |
$80$ ${}^{+10}_{-6}$ |
4 |
|
|
UA2 |
1
AABOUD 2018J select 4.61M ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{+}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{\mu}}}$ , 3.40M ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ , 3.23M ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{-}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$ and 2.49M ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ events in 4.6 fb${}^{-1}$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ data at 7 TeV. The ${{\mathit W}}$ mass is determined using the transverse mass and transverse lepton momentum distributions, accounting for correlations. The systematic error includes 0.011 GeV experimental and 0.014 GeV modelling uncertainties.
|
2
ABAZOV 2014N is a combination of ABAZOV 2009AB and ABAZOV 2012F, also giving more details on the analysis.
|
3
AALTONEN 2012E select 470k ${{\mathit W}}$ ${{\mathit \nu}}$ decays and 625k ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ decays in 2.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of Run-II data. The mass is determined using the transverse mass, transverse lepton momentum and transverse missing energy distributions, accounting for correlations. This result supersedes AALTONEN 2007F. AALTONEN 2014D gives more details on the procedures followed by the authors.
|
4
ABDALLAH 2008A use direct reconstruction of the kinematics of ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ and ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ events for energies 172 GeV and above. The ${{\mathit W}}$ mass was also extracted from the dependence of the ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}}$ cross section close to the production threshold and combined appropriately to obtain the final result. The systematic error includes $\pm0.025$ GeV due to final state interactions and $\pm0.009$ GeV due to LEP energy uncertainty.
|
5
ABBIENDI 2006 use direct reconstruction of the kinematics of ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}$ and ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ events. The result quoted here is obtained combining this mass value with the results using ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\,'}}{{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\mathit \ell}^{\,'}}}$ events in the energy range $183 - 207$ GeV (ABBIENDI 2003C) and the dependence of the $WW$ production cross-section on ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$ at threshold. The systematic error includes $\pm0.009$ GeV due to the uncertainty on the LEP beam energy.
|
6
ACHARD 2006 use direct reconstruction of the kinematics of ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}$ and ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ events in the C.M. energy range $189 - 209$ GeV. The result quoted here is obtained combining this mass value with the results obtained from a direct ${{\mathit W}}$ mass reconstruction at 172 and 183 GeV and with those from the dependence of the ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}}$ production cross-section on ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$ at 161 and 172 GeV (ACCIARRI 1999 ).
|
7
SCHAEL 2006 use direct reconstruction of the kinematics of ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{{{\mathit \ell}}}}}$ and ${{\mathit W}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ events in the C.M. energy range $183 - 209$ GeV. The result quoted here is obtained combining this mass value with those obtained from the dependence of the ${{\mathit W}}$ pair production cross-section on ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$ at 161 and 172 GeV (BARATE 1997 and BARATE 1997S respectively). The systematic error includes $\pm0.009$ GeV due to possible effects of final state interactions in the ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ channel and $\pm0.009$ GeV due to the uncertainty on the LEP beam energy.
|
8
ABAZOV 2002D improve the measurement of the ${{\mathit W}}$-boson mass including ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ events in which the electron is close to a boundary of a central electromagnetic calorimeter module. Properly combining the results obtained by fitting $\mathit m_{\mathit T}({{\mathit W}}$), $\mathit p_{\mathit T}({{\mathit e}}$), and $\mathit p_{\mathit T}({{\mathit \nu}}$), this sample provides a mass value of $80.574$ $\pm0.405$ GeV. The value reported here is a combination of this measurement with all previous ${D0}{{\mathit W}}$-boson mass measurements.
|
9
AFFOLDER 2001E fit the transverse mass spectrum of 30115 ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ events ($\mathit M_{{{\mathit W}}}$= $80.473$ $\pm0.065$ $\pm0.092$ GeV) and of 14740 ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{\mu}}}$ events ($\mathit M_{{{\mathit W}}}$= $80.465$ $\pm0.100$ $\pm0.103$ GeV) obtained in the run IB (1994-95). Combining the electron and muon results, accounting for correlated uncertainties, yields $\mathit M_{{{\mathit W}}}$= $80.470$ $\pm0.089$ GeV. They combine this value with their measurement of ABE 1995P reported in run IA (1992-93) to obtain the quoted value.
|
10
ANDREEV 2018A obtain this result in a combined electroweak and QCD analysis using all deep-inelastic ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit p}}$ and ${{\mathit e}^{-}}{{\mathit p}}$ neutral current and charged current scattering cross sections published by the H1 Collaboration, including data with longitudinally polarized lepton beams.
|
11
ABAZOV 2012F select 1677k ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ decays in 4.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of Run-II data. The mass is determined using the transverse mass and transverse lepton momentum distributions, accounting for correlations.
|
12
ABAZOV 2009AB study the transverse mass, transverse electron momentum, and transverse missing energy in a sample of 0.5 million ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ decays selected in Run-II data. The quoted result combines all three methods, accounting for correlations.
|
13
AALTONEN 2007F obtain high purity ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ and ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{\mu}}}$ candidate samples totaling 63,964 and 51,128 events respectively. The ${{\mathit W}}$ mass value quoted above is derived by simultaneously fitting the transverse mass and the lepton, and neutrino p$_{T}$ distributions.
|
14
AKTAS 2006 fit the Q${}^{2}$ dependence (300 $<$ Q${}^{2}$ $<$ 30,000 GeV${}^{2}$) of the charged-current differential cross section with a propagator mass. The first error is experimental and the second corresponds to uncertainties due to input parameters and model assumptions.
|
15
CHEKANOV 2002C fit the $\mathit Q{}^{2}$ dependence (200$<\mathit Q{}^{2}<$60000 GeV${}^{2}$) of the charged-current differential cross sections with a propagator mass fit. The last error is due to the uncertainty on the probability density functions.
|
16
BREITWEG 2000D fit the $\mathit Q{}^{2}$ dependence (200 $<$ Q${}^{2}<$ 22500 GeV${}^{2}$) of the charged-current differential cross sections with a propagator mass fit. The last error is due to the uncertainty on the probability density functions.
|
17
ALITTI 1992B result has two contributions to the systematic error ($\pm0.83$); one ($\pm0.81$) cancels in ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}/{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit Z}}}$ and one ($\pm0.17$) is noncancelling. These were added in quadrature. We choose the ALITTI 1992B value without using the LEP ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit Z}}}$ value, because we perform our own combined fit.
|
18
There are two contributions to the systematic error ($\pm0.84$): one ($\pm0.81$) which cancels in ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}/{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit Z}}}$ and one ($\pm0.21$) which is non-cancelling. These were added in quadrature.
|
19
ABE 1989I systematic error dominated by the uncertainty in the absolute energy scale.
|
20
ALBAJAR 1989 result is from a total sample of 299 ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ events.
|
21
ALBAJAR 1989 result is from a total sample of 67 ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ events.
|
22
ALBAJAR 1989 result is from ${{\mathit W}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ events.
|