| $2.22$ ${}^{+0.20}_{-0.19}$ |
2298 |
1 |
|
DLPH |
| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
|
|
2 |
|
CDF |
|
|
3 |
|
UA2 |
|
|
4 |
|
THEO |
|
|
5 |
|
THEO |
|
|
6 |
|
THEO |
|
|
7 |
|
THEO |
|
|
8 |
|
THEO |
|
|
9 |
|
THEO |
|
|
10 |
|
THEO |
|
|
11 |
|
THEO |
|
1
ABREU 2001I combine results from ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ interactions at 189 GeV leading to ${{\mathit W}^{+}}{{\mathit W}^{-}}$ , ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ , and ${{\mathit \nu}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ final states with results from ABREU 1999L at 183 GeV to determine $\Delta \mathit g{}^{{{\mathit Z}}}_{1}$, $\Delta \kappa _{{{\mathit \gamma}}}$, and $\lambda _{{{\mathit \gamma}}}$. $\Delta \kappa _{{{\mathit \gamma}}}$ and $\lambda _{{{\mathit \gamma}}}$ are simultaneously floated in the fit to determine $\mu _{{{\mathit W}}}$.
|
|
2
ABE 1995G report $-1.3<\kappa <3.2$ for $\lambda $=0 and $-0.7<\lambda <0.7$ for $\kappa $=1 in ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ X and ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}_{{\mu}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ X at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ = $1.8$ TeV.
|
|
3
ALITTI 1992C measure $\kappa $ = $1$ ${}^{+2.6}_{-2.2}$ and $\lambda $ = $0$ ${}^{+1.7}_{-1.8}$ in ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + X at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ = 630 GeV. At 95$\%$CL they report $-3.5<\kappa <5.9$ and $-3.6<\lambda <3.5$.
|
|
4
SAMUEL 1992 use preliminary CDF and UA2 data and find $-2.4<\kappa <3.7$ at 96$\%$CL and $-3.1<\kappa <4.2$ at 95$\%$CL respectively. They use data for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ production and radiative ${{\mathit W}}$ decay.
|
|
5
SAMUEL 1991 use preliminary CDF data for ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ X to obtain $-11.3$ ${}\leq{}$ $\Delta \kappa $ ${}\leq{}$ $10.9$. Note that their $\kappa $ = 1$−\Delta \kappa $.
|
|
6
GRIFOLS 1988 uses deviation from $\rho $ parameter to set limit $\Delta \kappa $ ${ {}\lesssim{} }$ 65 ($\mathit M{}^{2}_{\mathit W}/\Lambda {}^{2}$).
|
|
7
GROTCH 1987 finds the limit $-37$ $<$ $\Delta \kappa $ $<$ 73.5 (90$\%$ CL) from the experimental limits on ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \nu}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ assuming three neutrino generations and $-19.5$ $<$ $\Delta \kappa $ $<$ 56 for four generations. Note their $\Delta \kappa $ has the opposite sign as our definition.
|
|
8
VANDERBIJ 1987 uses existing limits to the photon structure to obtain $\vert \Delta \kappa \vert $ $<$ 33 (${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}/\Lambda $). In addition VANDERBIJ 1987 discusses problems with using the $\rho $ parameter of the Standard Model to determine $\Delta \kappa $.
|
|
9
GRAU 1985 uses the muon anomaly to derive a coupled limit on the anomalous magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole ($\lambda $) moments 1.05 $>\Delta \kappa $ ln($\Lambda /{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$) $+$ $\lambda $/2 $>-2.77$. In the Standard Model $\lambda $ = 0.
|
|
10
SUZUKI 1985 uses partial-wave unitarity at high energies to obtain $\vert \Delta \kappa \vert $ ${ {}\lesssim{} }$ 190 (${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}/\Lambda ){}^{2}$. From the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, SUZUKI 1985 obtains $\vert \Delta \kappa \vert $ ${ {}\lesssim{} }$ 2.2/ln($\Lambda /{\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}$). Finally SUZUKI 1985 uses deviations from the $\rho $ parameter and obtains a very qualitative, order-of-magnitude limit $\vert \Delta \kappa \vert $ ${ {}\lesssim{} }$ 150 (${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit W}}}/\Lambda ){}^{4}$ if $\vert \Delta \kappa \vert $ ${}\ll$1.
|
|
11
HERZOG 1984 consider the contribution of ${{\mathit W}}$-boson to muon magnetic moment including anomalous coupling of ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ . Obtain a limit $-1$ $<$ $\Delta \kappa $ $<$ 3 for $\Lambda $ ${ {}\gtrsim{} }$ 1 TeV.
|
