${{\mathit Z}}$ HADRONIC POLE CROSS SECTION

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S044SH
OUR EVALUATION is obtained using the fit procedure and correlations as determined by the LEP Electroweak Working Group (see the note “The ${{\mathit Z}}$ boson” and ref. LEP-SLC 2006). Corrections as discussed in VOUTSINAS 2020 and JANOT 2020 are also included. This quantity is defined as

$\sigma{}{}^{0}_{\mathit h}$ = ${12 {{\mathit \pi}}\over \mathit M{}^{2}_{{{\mathit Z}}}}{\Gamma\mathrm {({{\mathit e}^{+}} {{\mathit e}^{-}})}~\Gamma\mathrm {({\mathrm {hadrons}})}\over \Gamma {}^{2}_{{{\mathit Z}}}}$

It is one of the parameters used in the ${{\mathit Z}}$ lineshape fit.
VALUE (nb) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 41.4802 \pm0.0325}$ OUR EVALUATION
$41.4802$ $\pm0.0325$ 1
JANOT
2020
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$41.500$ $\pm0.037$ 2
VOUTSINAS
2020
$41.541$ $\pm0.037$
LEP-SLC
2006
${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$ = $88 - 94$ GeV
$41.501$ $\pm0.055$ 4.10M 3
ABBIENDI
2001A
OPAL ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $88 - 94$ GeV
$41.578$ $\pm0.069$ 3.70M
ABREU
2000F
DLPH ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $88 - 94$ GeV
$41.535$ $\pm0.055$ 3.54M
ACCIARRI
2000C
L3 ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $88 - 94$ GeV
$41.559$ $\pm0.058$ 4.07M 4
BARATE
2000C
ALEP ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $88 - 94$ GeV
$42$ $\pm4$ 450
ABRAMS
1989B
MRK2 ${\it{}E}^{\it{}ee}_{\rm{}cm}$= $89.2 - 93.0$ GeV
1  JANOT 2020 applies a correction to LEP-SLC 2006 using an updated Bhabha cross section calculation. This result also includes a correction to account for correlated luminosity bias as presented in VOUTSINAS 2020.
2  VOUTSINAS 2020 applies a correction to LEP-SLC 2006 to account for correlated luminosity bias.
3  ABBIENDI 2001A error includes approximately 0.031 due to statistics, 0.033 due to event selection systematics, 0.029 due to uncertainty in luminosity measurement, and 0.011 due to LEP energy uncertainty.
4  BARATE 2000C error includes approximately $0.030$ due to statistics, $0.026$ due to experimental systematics, and $0.025$ due to uncertainty in luminosity measurement.
References