Charginos are unknown mixtures of w-inos and charged higgsinos (the supersymmetric partners of ${{\mathit W}}$ and Higgs bosons). A lower mass limit for the lightest chargino (${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$) of approximately 45 GeV, independent of the field composition and of the decay mode, has been obtained by the LEP experiments from the analysis of the ${{\mathit Z}}$ width and decays. These results, as well as other now superseded limits from ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ collisions at energies below 136$~$GeV, and from hadronic collisions, can be found in the 1998 Edition (The European Physical Journal C3 1 (1998)) of this Review.

Unless otherwise stated, results in this section assume spectra, production rates, decay modes and branching ratios as evaluated in the MSSM, with gaugino and sfermion mass unification at the GUT scale. These papers generally study production of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{-}}$ and (in the case of hadronic collisions) ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ pairs, including the effects of cascade decays. The mass limits on ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ are either direct, or follow indirectly from the constraints set by the non-observation of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ states on the gaugino and higgsino MSSM parameters $\mathit M_{2}$ and $\mu $. For generic values of the MSSM parameters, limits from high-energy ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit e}^{-}}$ collisions coincide with the highest value of the mass allowed by phase-space, namely ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}{ {}\lesssim{} }\sqrt {s }$/2. The still unpublished combination of the results of the four LEP collaborations from the 2000 run of LEP2 at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ up to $\simeq{}209~$GeV yields a lower mass limit of 103.5$~$GeV valid for general MSSM models. The limits become however weaker in certain regions of the MSSM parameter space where the detection efficiencies or production cross sections are suppressed. For example, this may happen when: (i)$~$the mass differences $\Delta \mathit m_{+}$= ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ or $\Delta {\mathit m}_{{{\mathit \nu}}}$= ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}–{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}}}$ are very small, and the detection efficiency is reduced; (ii)$~$the electron sneutrino mass is small, and the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ production rate is suppressed due to a destructive interference between ${{\mathit s}}$ and ${{\mathit t}}$ channel exchange diagrams. The regions of MSSM parameter space where the following limits are valid are indicated in the comment lines or in the footnotes.

Some earlier papers are now obsolete and have been omitted. They were last listed in our PDG 2014 edition: K. Olive, $\mathit et~al.$ (Particle Data Group), Chinese Physics C38 070001 (2014) (http://pdg.lbl.gov).

VALUE (GeV) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT $> 820$ 95 1 AAD 2023 AE ATLS 2 SFOS ${{\mathit \ell}}$, jets, $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2Fa, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV $\text{none 260 - 420}$ 95 2 AAD 2023 CI ATLS 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2J, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $\text{none 260 - 520}$ 95 2 AAD 2023 CI ATLS 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1J, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $>230$ 95 3 AAD 2023 CI ATLS 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 133 GeV $> 450$ 95 3 AAD 2023 CI ATLS 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 260 GeV $\text{none 200 - 250}$ 95 4 AAD 2023 CP ATLS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit \ell}}$, Tchi1n2F, wino-bino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$= 1 GeV $> 525$ 95 4 AAD 2023 CP ATLS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit \ell}}$, Tchi1n2E, wino-bino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$= 1 GeV $\text{none 200 - 585}$ 95 5 AAD 2023 CR ATLS RPV, 2 same-sign, 3, 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$, 1, 2 ${{\mathit b}}$-jets, higgsino production with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{+}$ ${{\mathit \ell}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit \nu}}{+}$ ${{\mathit t}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit b}}$ via ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{i33}}}^{\,'}}$ coupling $\text{none 200 - 670}$ 95 5 AAD 2023 CR ATLS RPV, 2 same-sign, 3, 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$, 1, 2 ${{\mathit b}}$-jets, wino production with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{+}$ ${{\mathit \ell}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit \nu}}{+}$ ${{\mathit t}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit b}}$ via ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{i33}}}^{\,'}}$ coupling $> 150$ 95 6 AAD 2023 M ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}$, Tchi1chi1H, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $>$ 110 GeV $> 104$ 95 6 AAD 2023 M ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}$, Tchi1chi1H, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $>$ 90 GeV $> 1230$ 95 7 HAYRAPETYAN 2023 E CMS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n1A $> 1050$ 95 7 HAYRAPETYAN 2023 E CMS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1A $\text{none 290 - 670}$ 95 8 TUMASYAN 2023 B CMS 2 AK8 jets + $2 - 6$ AK4 jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1I, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV $\text{none 230 - 760}$ 95 8 TUMASYAN 2023 B CMS 2 AK8 jets + $2 - 6$ AK4 jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2Fb, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV $\text{none 240 - 970}$ 95 8 TUMASYAN 2023 B CMS 2 AK8 jets + $2 - 6$ AK4 jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2Fc, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV $\text{none 300 - 650}$ 95 8 TUMASYAN 2023 B CMS 2 AK8 jets + $2 - 6$ AK4 jets +$\not E_T$, THinoBinoA, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV $> 275$ 95 9 TUMASYAN 2022 Q CMS 2 or 3 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (soft), $\not E_T$; Tchi1n2F, wino-bino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}−{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$= 10 GeV $> 205$ 95 9 TUMASYAN 2022 Q CMS 2 or 3 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (soft), $\not E_T$; higgsino model with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ prod., ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}−{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 7.5 GeV $> 150$ 95 9 TUMASYAN 2022 Q CMS 2 or 3 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (soft), $\not E_T$; higgsino model with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ prod., ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}−{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 3 GeV $> 1450$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (flavor-democratic), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 1/2(${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 850 GeV $> 1360$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (flavor-democratic), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 1/2(${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1290$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (flavor-democratic), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 0.05${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+0.95{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1440$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (flavor-democratic), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 0.95${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+0.05{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1140$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (lepton in ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ decay is ${{\mathit \tau}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 1/2(${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1110$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (lepton in ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ decay is ${{\mathit \tau}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 0.05${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+0.95{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1140$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (lepton in ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ decay is ${{\mathit \tau}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 0.95${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+0.05{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 980$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (leptons in ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ decays are ${{\mathit \tau}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 1/2(${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 905$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (leptons in ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ decays are ${{\mathit \tau}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 0.05${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+0.95{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 875$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2B (leptons in ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ decays are ${{\mathit \tau}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = 0.95${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}+0.05{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 650$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 260$ 95 10 TUMASYAN 2022 S CMS 2 same-sign ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$, 3 or 4 leptons, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1080$ 95 11 AAD 2021 AX ATLS jets + large-R jets + $\not E_T$, TWinoBinoA, nearly independent of B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1060$ 95 11 AAD 2021 AX ATLS jets + large-R jets + $\not E_T$, TWinoHinoA, tan $\beta $ = 10, $\mu $ $>$ 0, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 900$ 95 11 AAD 2021 AX ATLS jets + large-R jets + $\not E_T$, THinoBinoA, nearly independent of B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 900$ 95 11 AAD 2021 AX ATLS jets + large-R jets + $\not E_T$, THinoWinoA, tan $\beta $ = 10, $\mu $ $>$ 0, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1060$ 95 11 AAD 2021 AX ATLS jets + large-R jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, full hadronic final state, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 960$ 95 11 AAD 2021 AX ATLS jets + large-R jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2Fb, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $\text{none 620 - 740}$ 95 11 AAD 2021 AX ATLS jets + large-R jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1I, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 640$ 95 12 AAD 2021 BG ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$+ $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, wino cross section, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 300$ 95 12 AAD 2021 BG ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$+ $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, wino cross section, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit Z}}}$ $> 240$ 95 12 AAD 2021 BG ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$+ $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, wino cross section, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 10 GeV $>190$ 95 12 AAD 2021 BG ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$+ $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, wino cross section, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1100$ 95 13 AAD 2021 E ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ resonances, TwinoLSPBL, RPV, B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit e}}$) = B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \nu}}$) = 1 $> 1050$ 95 13 AAD 2021 E ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ resonances, TwinoLSPBL, RPV, B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \mu}}$) = B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \nu}}$) = 1 $> 625$ 95 13 AAD 2021 E ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ resonances, TwinoLSPBL, RPV, B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \tau}}$) = B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \nu}}$) = 1 $> 975$ 95 13 AAD 2021 E ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ resonances, TwinoLSPBL, RPV, B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \ell}}$) = B( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \nu}}$) = 1 and ${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}},{{\mathit \mu}},{{\mathit \tau}}$ $\bf{> 1600}$ 95 14 AAD 2021 Y ATLS ${}\geq{}4{{\mathit \ell}}$, RPV Tchi1n2I with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{12k}}}}{}\not=$ 0, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1200 GeV $> 1100$ 95 14 AAD 2021 Y ATLS ${}\geq{}4{{\mathit \ell}}$, RPV Tchi1n2I with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{i33}}}}{}\not=$ 0, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1000 GeV $> 750$ 95 15 SIRUNYAN 2021 M CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2Fa, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $<$ 100 GeV $\text{none 400 - 820}$ 95 16 TUMASYAN 2021 C CMS 1 ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ + 2${{\mathit b}}$-jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ = 200 GeV $\text{none 160 - 820}$ 95 16 TUMASYAN 2021 C CMS 1 ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ + 2${{\mathit b}}$-jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ = 0 GeV $> 380$ 95 17 AAD 2020 AN ATLS 2${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$,Tn1n1A, GMSB $> 240$ 95 18 AAD 2020 I ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}$ (soft), jets, $\not E_T$; Tchi1n2Fa, wino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 7 GeV $> 345$ 95 19 AAD 2020 K ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 420$ 95 20 AAD 2020 O ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1H, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $\bf{> 1000}$ 95 21 AAD 2020 O ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1C, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $> 740$ 95 22 AAD 2020 R ATLS 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + 2${{\mathit b}}$-jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 290$ 95 23 SIRUNYAN 2020 AU CMS soft ${{\mathit \tau}}$ + jet + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2D, wino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 50 GeV $> 1050$ 95 24 SIRUNYAN 2020 B CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1F, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\widetilde{\mathit G}}}$ $> 825$ 95 24 SIRUNYAN 2020 B CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1G, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{+}$ soft $> 840$ 95 24 SIRUNYAN 2020 B CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n12-GGM, 120 GeV $<$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $<$ 720 GeV $> 680$ 95 25 AABOUD 2019 AU ATL 0, 1, 2 or more ${{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ ($\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit b}}{{\mathit b}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}},{{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$) (various searches), Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $>112$ 95 26 SIRUNYAN 2019 BU CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$+2 jets, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{+}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, heavy sleptons, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $>215$ 95 26 SIRUNYAN 2019 BU CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ + 2 jets, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{+}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, heavy sleptons, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 30 GeV, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{+}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $> 235$ 95 27 SIRUNYAN 2019 CI CMS ${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit H}}$ ($\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$) + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV $>930$ 95 28 SIRUNYAN 2019 K CMS ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + lepton + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n1A $> 630$ 95 29 AABOUD 2018 AY ATLS 2${{\mathit \tau}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1D and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}_{{{L}}}}$-only, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 760$ 95 30 AABOUD 2018 AY ATLS 2${{\mathit \tau}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1n2D and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}_{{{L}}}}$-only, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 740$ 95 31 AABOUD 2018 BT ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1C, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $> 1125$ 95 32 AABOUD 2018 BT ATLS 2,3${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1n2C, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $> 580$ 95 33 AABOUD 2018 BT ATLS 2,3${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $\text{none 130 - 230, 290 - 880}$ 95 34 AABOUD 2018 CK ATLS 2${{\mathit H}}$ ($\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\mathit b}})+\not E_T$,Tn1n1A, GMSB $\text{none 220 - 600}$ 95 35 AABOUD 2018 CO ATLS 2,3${{\mathit \ell}}$ + $\not E_T$, recursive jigsaw, Tchi1n2F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 175$ 95 36 AABOUD 2018 R ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}$ (soft) + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, wino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 10 GeV $> 145$ 95 37 AABOUD 2018 R ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}}$ (soft) + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2G, higgsino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 5 GeV $> 1060$ 95 38 AABOUD 2018 U ATLS 2${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, GGM, Tchi1chi1A, any NLSP mass $> 1400$ 95 39 AABOUD 2018 Z ATLS ${}\geq{}4{{\mathit \ell}}$, RPV, ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{12k}}}}{}\not=$0, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $>$ 500 GeV $> 1320$ 95 39 AABOUD 2018 Z ATLS ${}\geq{}4{{\mathit \ell}}$, RPV, ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{12k}}}}{}\not=$0, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $>$ 50 GeV $> 980$ 95 39 AABOUD 2018 Z ATLS ${}\geq{}4{{\mathit \ell}}$, RPV, ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{i33}}}}{}\not=$0, 400 GeV $<$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $<$ 700 GeV $> 980$ 95 40 SIRUNYAN 2018 AA CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, GGM, wino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ pair production, nearly degenerate wino and bino masses $> 780$ 95 40 SIRUNYAN 2018 AA CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n1A $> 950$ 95 40 SIRUNYAN 2018 AA CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1A $> 230$ 95 41 SIRUNYAN 2018 AJ CMS 2${{\mathit \ell}}$ (soft) + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, wino, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 20 GeV $> 1150$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2A, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.5 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1120$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2A, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.05 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1050$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2A, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.95 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1080$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2H, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.5 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1030$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2H, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.05 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 1050$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2H, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.95 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 625$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2D, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.5 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 180$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 450$ 95 42 SIRUNYAN 2018 AO CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ or ${}\geq{}3{{\mathit \ell}}$ , Tchi1n2F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 480$ 95 43 SIRUNYAN 2018 AP CMS Combination of searches, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 650$ 95 43 SIRUNYAN 2018 AP CMS Combination of searches, Tchi1n2F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 535$ 95 43 SIRUNYAN 2018 AP CMS Combination of searches, Tchi1n2I, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $\text{none 160 - 610}$ 95 44 SIRUNYAN 2018 AR CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $\text{none 170 - 200}$ 95 45 SIRUNYAN 2018 DN CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}$, Tchi1chi1E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 1 GeV $> 810$ 95 45 SIRUNYAN 2018 DN CMS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}$, Tchi1chi1C, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 630$ 95 46 SIRUNYAN 2018 DP CMS 2${{\mathit \tau}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1D,${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $> 710$ 95 46 SIRUNYAN 2018 DP CMS 2${{\mathit \tau}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1n2D, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 170$ 95 47 SIRUNYAN 2018 X CMS ${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit H}}$ ($\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$) + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $<$ 25 GeV $> 420$ 95 48 KHACHATRYAN 2017 L CMS 2${{\mathit \tau}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1C and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}$-only, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $\text{none 220 - 490}$ 95 49 SIRUNYAN 2017 AW CMS 1${{\mathit \ell}}$ + 2${{\mathit b}}$-jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $>500$ 95 50 AAD 2016 AA ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}+\not E_T$,Tchi1chi1B,${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $>220$ 95 50 AAD 2016 AA ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1C, low ${{\mathit \Delta}}$m for ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $>700$ 95 51 AAD 2016 AA ATLS 3,4${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$,Tchi1n2B, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $>700$ 95 51 AAD 2016 AA ATLS 3,4${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$, Tchi1n2C, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$+ 0.5 (or 0.95) (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$) $>400$ 95 51 AAD 2016 AA ATLS 2 hadronic ${{\mathit \tau}}+\not E_T$ $\&$ 3${{\mathit \ell}}+\not E_T$ combination,Tchi1n2D,${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $> 540$ 95 52 KHACHATRYAN 2016 R CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + 1 ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n1A $>250$ 95 53 AAD 2015 BA ATLS ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $>590$ 95 54 AAD 2015 CA ATLS ${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, GGM, bino-like NLSP, any NLSP mass $\text{none 124 - 361}$ 95 54 AAD 2015 CA ATLS ${}\geq{}$1 ${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + ${{\mathit e}},{{\mathit \mu}}$ + $\not E_T$, GGM, wino-like NLSP $> 700$ 95 55 AAD 2014 H ATLS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, simplified model, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 345$ 95 55 AAD 2014 H ATLS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, simplified model, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 148$ 95 55 AAD 2014 H ATLS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\mathit H}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, simplified model, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 380$ 95 55 AAD 2014 H ATLS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\mathit \tau}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \tau}^{\mp}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, simplified model, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 750$ 95 56 AAD 2014 X ATLS RPV, ${}\geq{}4{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}^{(*)\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ $> 210$ 95 57 KHACHATRYAN 2014 L CMS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ simplified models, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV 58 AAD 2013 ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ + $\not E_T$, pMSSM, SMS 59 AAD 2013 B ATLS 2${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ + $\not E_T$, pMSSM, SMS $> 540$ 95 60 AAD 2012 CT ATLS ${}\geq{}4{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$, RPV, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ $>$ 300 GeV 61 CHATRCHYAN 2012 BJ CMS ${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit \ell}}$, jets + $\not E_T$, ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\bf{>94}$ 95 62 ABDALLAH 2003 M DLPH ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$, tan $\beta {}\leq{}$40, $\Delta {\mathit m}_{{+} }>$3~GeV,all ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit 0}}}$ • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • $> 310$ 95 63 AAD 2020 AN ATLS 2${{\mathit \gamma}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n2E, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=0 GeV $> 570$ 95 64 KHACHATRYAN 2016 AA CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1chi1A $> 680$ 95 64 KHACHATRYAN 2016 AA CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, Tchi1n1A $> 710$ 95 64 KHACHATRYAN 2016 AA CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + jets + $\not E_T$, GGM, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ pair production, wino-like NLSP $> 1000$ 95 65 KHACHATRYAN 2016 R CMS ${}\geq{}1{{\mathit \gamma}}$ + 1 ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$ + $\not E_T$, Tglu1F, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ $>$ 200 GeV $> 307$ 95 66 KHACHATRYAN 2016 Y CMS 1,2 soft ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$+jets+$\not E_T$, Tchi1n2A, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}−{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$=20 GeV $> 410$ 95 67 AAD 2014 AV ATLS ${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit \tau}}$ + $\not E_T$, direct ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ production, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 345$ 95 68 AAD 2014 AV ATLS ${}\geq{}$2 ${{\mathit \tau}}$ + $\not E_T$, direct ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ production, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $\text{none 100 - 105, 120 - 135, 145 - 160}$ 95 69 AAD 2014 G ATLS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}^{+}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\mathit W}^{-}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, simplified model, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $\text{none 140 - 465}$ 95 69 AAD 2014 G ATLS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{+}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\mathit \ell}^{-}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, simplified model, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $\text{none 180 - 355}$ 95 69 AAD 2014 G ATLS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, simplified model, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV $> 168$ 95 70 AALTONEN 2014 CDF 3${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$+ $\not E_T$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, mSUGRA with ${\mathit m}_{\mathrm {0}}$=60 GeV 71 KHACHATRYAN 2014 I CMS ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, simplified model 72 AALTONEN 2013 Q CDF ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit X}}$, simplified gravity- and gauge-mediated models 73 AAD 2012 AS ATLS 3${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ + $\not E_T$, pMSSM 74 AAD 2012 T ATLS ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}$ + $\not E_T$, ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}$ + $\not E_T$, ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ 75 CHATRCHYAN 2011 B CMS ${{\widetilde{\mathit W}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\widetilde{\mathit G}}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit W}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit G}}}$,GMSB $> 163$ 95 76 CHATRCHYAN 2011 V CMS tan ${{\mathit \beta}}$=3, ${{\mathit m}_{{{0}}}}$=60 GeV, ${{\mathit A}_{{{0}}}}$=0, ${{\mathit \mu}}>$0 1  AAD 2023AE searched in 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with 2 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ with same flavour and opposite sign, plus jets and $\not E_T$, defining signal region with the dilepton invariant mass both on- and off-shell with respect to the ${{\mathit Z}}$ boson. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on models of strong and electroweak production. For electroweak production, limits are placed on production of mass-degenerate, wino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ and $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, see figure 15. 2  AAD 2023CI searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions for events containing 1 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$), jets, and $\not E_T$. Final states consistent with the production of a diboson system plus $\not E_T$ were identified also by making use of large-R jet tagging techniques. No excess on top of the Standard Model background was observed. Limits were set on the production of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ (assuming wino cross sections) decaying to ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ or ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$. See their figure 9. 3  AAD 2023CI searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions for events containing 1 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$), jets, and $\not E_T$. Final states consistent with the production of a boson + Higgs system plus $\not E_T$ were identified via a BDT. No excess on top of the Standard Model background was observed. Limits were set on the production of degenerate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ (assuming wino cross sections) decaying into ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit h}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$. See their figure 10. 4  AAD 2023CP searched in 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with 2 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ with same charge plus at least one jet and $\not E_T$, defining signal region based on 'stransverse mass' of the dilepton system, $\not E_T$ significance and effective mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the mass of mass-degenerate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ for the wino-like production of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ followed by the decay into either ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ or ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit h}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, see figure 13. 5  AAD 2023CR searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for RPV SUSY in final states with multiple leptons and ${{\mathit b}}$-tagged jets. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the production of electroweakinos (wino or higgsino) that decay via RPV coupling ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{i33}}}^{\,'}}$ to a charged lepton or a neutrino, a ${{\mathit b}}$ quark, and an additional ${{\mathit t}}$ or ${{\mathit b}}$ quark, see their figure 16. A second model addresses direct ${{\widetilde{\mathit \mu}}_{{{L,R}}}}$ production and decay to a muon and a bino-like neutralino, which decays in the same way as in the first model, see their figure 17. 6  AAD 2023M searched in 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ pair production, followed by ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ in events with two leptons. The focus is on models where ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ is close to the ${{\mathit W}}$ mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ mass as a function of ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, see Figure 9. 7  HAYRAPETYAN 2023E searched in 137 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for evidence of gluino, top squark and electroweakino pair production in events with at least one photon, multiple jets, and large $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set in models for strong production, Tglu4D, Tglu4E, Tglu4F and Tstop13, see their figure 9. They also interpret the results in the models for electroweak production, shown in their figure 10. Tchi1n1A assumes wino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ production, while Tchi1chi1A assumes higgsino-like cross sections and includes ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1,2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ production. For ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ alone no mass point can be excluded in the model Tchi1chi1A, but in another model for ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ production, Tn1n2A. 8  TUMASYAN 2023B searched in 137 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for evidence of electroweakino pair production with decays including hadronically decaying bosons, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$, or ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$, identified with a DNN classifying large-area (AK8) jets. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of the nearly mass degenerate wino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ in the models Tchi1chi1I , Tchi1n2Fb, and Tchi1n2Fc, see their figure 4. They also consider a model that contains both ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ production, see their figure 5 (upper). Results are also interpreted in the model THinoBinoA with nearly mass-degenerate higgsino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{3}}}^{0}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$, and a lighter bino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, see their figure 5 (lower). 9  TUMASYAN 2022Q searched in up to 137 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for evidence of electroweakino and top squark pair production with a small mass difference between the produced supersymmetric particles and the lightest neutralino in events with two or three low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ in the model Tchi1n2F, see their Figure 8. Limits are also set in a higgsino simplified model with both ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ production, where ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ and ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = 1/2(${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ + ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$). A model inspired by the pMSSM is used for further interpretations in the case of a higgsino LSP, see their Figure 9. Limits are also set on the mass of the top squark in the models Tstop2 and Tstop3, see their Figure 10. 10  TUMASYAN 2022S searched in 137 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for evidence of electroweakino pair production in events with three or four leptons, with up to two hadronically decaying ${{\mathit \tau}}$ leptons, or two same-sign light leptons (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$). No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ in the models Tchi1n2B (in flavory-democratic and tau-enriched or -dominated scenarios), Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F, see their Figures $16 - 20$, and on the mass of the higgsino-triplet ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$, ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$, and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ in the models Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B, and Tn1n1C, see their Figure 21. 11  AAD 2021AX searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for pair production of electroweakinos decaying to the LSP via the emission of Standard Model bosons (Higgs, ${{\mathit W}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}$) decaying into hadrons. The final state in all cases characterised by the presence of $\not E_T$, jets, and large-R jets tagged according to the boson of interest. Different assumptions (Higgsino, Wino, Bino) are made for the pair produced electroweakinos and for the LSP multipliet. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the electroweakino masses as a function of the model parameters (in particular ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$). See Figs. 12, 14, 15. 12  AAD 2021BG searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for pair production ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ in final states with three leptons, with and without assuming the presence of a ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ decay. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ mass in Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F and Tchi1n2Ga. See their Fig. 16. 13  AAD 2021E searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for production of wino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, followed by the RPV decay of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ into ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \ell}}$, ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ or ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ and of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ into ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ or ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit \ell}}$, in events with three leptons, looking for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit \ell}}$ resonances. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the common ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}/{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ mass in the TwinoLSPRPV simplified model, as a function of the common ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}/{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ branching fraction to a Z boson. See Figure 9. 14  AAD 2021Y searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for supersymmetry in events with four or more leptons (electrons, muons and tau-leptons). No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on Tchi1n12-GGM, and RPV models similar to Tchi1n2I, Tglu1A (with ${{\mathit q}}$ = ${{\mathit u}}$, ${{\mathit d}}$, ${{\mathit s}}$, ${{\mathit c}}$, ${{\mathit b}}$, with equal branching fractions), and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}_{{{L}}}}$ $/$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ (mass-degenerate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \ell}}_{{{L}}}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}}$ of all 3 generations), all with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ via ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{12k}}}}$ or ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{i 33}}}}$ (where $\mathit i,k$ $\in$ 1,2), see their Figure 11. 15  SIRUNYAN 2021M searched in 137 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for supersymmetry in events with two opposite-sign same-flavor leptons (electrons, muons) and $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the gluino mass in the simplified model Tglu4C, see their Figure 10, on the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ mass in Tchi1n2Fa, see their Figure 11, on the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ mass in Tn1n1C and Tn1n1B for ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}={\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}={\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$, see their Figure 12. Limits are also set on the light squark mass for the simplified model Tsqk2A, on the sbottom mass in Tsbot3, see their Figure 13, and on the slepton mass in direct electroweak pair production of mass-degenerate left- and right-handed sleptons (selectrons and smuons), see their Figure 14. 16  TUMASYAN 2021C searched in 137 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for supersymmetry in events with with one lepton, a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of bottom quarks, and large $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Lower limits are set on the masses of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ in the simplified model Tchi1n2E, see their Figure 6. 17  AAD 2020AN searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with two photons and missing transverse momentum. Events are further categorised in terms of lepton or jet multiplicity. No significant excess over the expected background is observed. Limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are set on the Higgsino mass in the T1n1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 11. 18  AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for electroweak production in models with compressed mass spectra as Tchi1n2Fa. A dataset of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ was used. Events with $\not E_T$, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Constraints at 95$\%$ C.L. are placed on the mass of the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ (degenerate with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$) at 240 GeV for a mass splitting between ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ of 7 GeV and extend down to a mass splitting of 1.5 GeV at the LEP chargino mass limit of 92.4 GeV. See their Fig. 14(b,c). 19  AAD 2020K reported on a search for electroweak production in models with mass splittings near the electroweak scale as Tchi1n2F and exploiting three-lepton final state events with an emulated recursive jigsaw reconstruction method. The analysis uses a dataset of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$. Exclusion limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are derived on next-to-lightest neutralinos and charginos with masses up to 345 GeV for a massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7. 20  AAD 2020O reported on a search for electroweak production in models with charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with exactly two oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum. A dataset of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ was used. Exclusion limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are derived on ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ decaying according to the Tchi1chi1H simplified model. Chargino masses up to 420 GeV are excluded for a massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7(a). 21  AAD 2020O reported on a search for electroweak production in models with charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with exactly two oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum. A dataset of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ was used. Exclusion limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are derived on ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ decaying according to the Tchi1chi1C simplified model. Chargino masses up to 1000 GeV are excluded for a massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7(b). 22  AAD 2020R searched for electroweak production in the model Tchi1n2E, selecting events with a pair of ${{\mathit b}}$-tagged jets consistent with those from a Higgs boson decay, either an electron or a muon from the ${{\mathit W}}$ boson decay and $\not E_T$. The analysis uses a dataset of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$. Exclusion limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are derived on next-to-lightest neutralinos and charginos with masses up to 740 GeV for a massless lightest neutralino, assuming pure wino cross-sections. See their Fig. 6. 23  SIRUNYAN 2020AU searched in 77.2 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events containing one soft, hadronically decaying tau lepton, one energetic jet from initial-state radiation, and large $\not E_T$. No excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2D simplified model, see their Figure 2. 24  SIRUNYAN 2020B searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with at least one photon and large $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on chargino masses in a general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking (GGM) scenario Tchi1n12-GGM, see Figure 4. Limits are also set on the NLSP mass in the Tchi1chi1F and Tchi1chi1G simplified models, see their Figure 5. Finally, limits are set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4A simplified model, see Figure 6. 25  AABOUD 2019AU searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and next-to-lightest neutralinos decaying into lightest neutralinos and a ${{\mathit W}}$, and a Higgs boson, respectively. Fully hadronic, semileptonic, diphoton, and multilepton (electrons, muons) final states with missing transverse momentum are considered in this search. Observations are consistent with the Standard Model expectations, and 95$\%$ confidence-level limits of up to 680 GeV on the chargino/next-to-lightest neutralino masses are set (Tchi1n2E model). See their Figure 14 for an overlay of exclusion contours from all searches. 26  SIRUNYAN 2019BU searched for pair production of gauginos via vector boson fusion assuming the gaugino spectrum is compressed, in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. The final states explored included zero leptons plus two jets, one lepton plus two jets, and one hadronic tau plus two jets. A similar bound is obtained in the light slepton limit. 27  SIRUNYAN 2019CI searched in 77.5 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with one or more high-momentum Higgs bosons, decaying to pairs of photons, jets and $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the sbottom mass in the Tsbot4 simplified model, see Figure 3, and on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2E simplified model, see their Figure 4. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A and Tn1n1B simplified models, see their Figure 5. 28  SIRUNYAN 2019K searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with a photon, an electron or muon, and large $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. In the framework of GMSB, limits are set on the chargino and neutralino mass in the Tchi1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 6. Limits are also set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4A simplified model, and on the squark mass in the Tsqk4A simplified model, see their Figure 7. 29  AABOUD 2018AY searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos as in Tchi1chi1D models in events characterised by the presence of at least two hadronically decaying tau leptons and large missing transverse energy. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. In the Tchi1chi1D model, assuming decays via intermediate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}_{{{L}}}}$, the observed limits rule out ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ masses up to 630 GeV for a massless ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$. See their Fig.7 (left). Interpretations are also provided in Fig 8 (top) for different assumptions on the ratio between ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}}$ and ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ + ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$. 30  AABOUD 2018AY searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos as in Tchi1n2D models, in events characterised by the presence of at least two hadronically decaying tau leptons and large missing transverse energy. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Assuming decays via intermediate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}_{{{L}}}}$ and ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$, the observed limits rule out ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ masses up to 760 GeV for a massless ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$. See their Fig.7 (right). Interpretations are also provided in Fig 8 (bottom) for different assumptions on the ratio between ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}}$ and ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ + ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$. 31  AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 750 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1chi1C simplified model exploiting 2${{\mathit \ell}}$ + 0 jets signatures, see their Figure 8(a). 32  AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 1100 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1n2C simplified model exploiting 3${{\mathit \ell}}$ signature, see their Figure 8(c). 33  AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 580 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1n2F simplified model exploiting 2${{\mathit \ell}}$+2 jets and 3${{\mathit \ell}}$ signatures, see their Figure 8(d). 34  AABOUD 2018CK searched for events with at least 3 ${{\mathit b}}$-jets and large missing transverse energy in two datasets of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV of 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ and 24.3 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ depending on the trigger requirements. The analyses aimed to reconstruct two Higgs bosons decaying to pairs of ${{\mathit b}}$-quarks. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the Higgsino mass in the T1n1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 15(a). Constraints are also presented as a function of the BR of Higgsino decaying into an higgs boson and a gravitino, see their Figure 15(b). 35  AABOUD 2018CO searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of mass-degenerate charginos and next-to-lightest neutralinos in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. The search channels are based on recursive jigsaw reconstruction. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 600 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1n2F simplified model exploiting the statistical combination of 2${{\mathit \ell}}$+2 jets and 3${{\mathit \ell}}$ channels. Chargino masses below 220 GeV are not excluded due to an excess of events above the SM prediction in the dedicated regions. See their Figure 13(d). 36  AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in Tchi1n2G wino models and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ masses are excluded up to 175 GeV for ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ $−$ ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 10 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 2 GeV, see their Fig. 10 (bottom). 37  AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in Tchi1n2G higgsino models and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ masses are excluded up to 145 GeV for ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}} - {\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 5 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 2.5 GeV, see their Fig. 10 (top). 38  AABOUD 2018U searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV in events with at least one isolated photon, possibly jets and significant transverse momentum targeting generalised models of gauge-mediated SUSY breaking. No significant excess of events is observed above the SM prediction. Results of the diphoton channel are interpreted in terms of lower limits on the masses of gauginos Tchi1chi1A models, which reach as high as 1.3 TeV. Gaugino masses below 1060 GeV are excluded for any NLSP mass, see their Fig. 10. 39  AABOUD 2018Z searched in 36.1 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events containing four or more charged leptons (electrons, muons and up to two hadronically decaying taus). No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Limits are set on the Higgsino mass in simplified models of general gauge mediated supersymmetry Tn1n1A/Tn1n1B/Tn1n1C, see their Figure 9. Limits are also set on the wino, slepton, sneutrino and gluino mass in a simplified model of NLSP pair production with R-parity violating decays of the LSP via ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{12k}}}}$ or ${{\mathit \lambda}_{{{i33}}}}$ to charged leptons, see their Figures 7, 8. 40  SIRUNYAN 2018AA searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with at least one photon and large $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in a general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking (GGM) scenario with bino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ and wino-like ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ , see Figure 7. Limits are also set on the NLSP mass in the Tchi1n1A and Tchi1chi1A simplified models, see their Figure 8. Finally, limits are set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4A and Tglu4B simplified models, see their Figure 9, and on the squark mass in the Tskq4A and Tsqk4B simplified models, see their Figure 10. 41  SIRUNYAN 2018AJ searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events containing two low-momentum, oppositely charged leptons (electrons or muons) and $\not E_T$. No excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2F simplified model, see their Figure 5. Limits are also set on the stop mass in the Tstop10 simplified model, see their Figure 6. Finally, limits are set on the Higgsino mass in the Tchi1n2G simplified model, see Figure 8 and in the pMSSM, see Figure 7. 42  SIRUNYAN 2018AO searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in events with either two or more leptons (electrons or muons) of the same electric charge, or with three or more leptons, which can include up to two hadronically decaying tau leptons. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino/neutralino mass in the Tchi1n2A, Tchi1n2H, Tchi1n2D, Tchi1n2E and Tchi1n2F simplified models, see their Figures 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B and Tn1n1C simplified models, see their Figure 19. 43  SIRUNYAN 2018AP searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos by combining a number of previous and new searches. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino/neutralino mass in the Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F and Tchi1n2I simplified models, see their Figures 7, 8, 9 an 10. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B and Tn1n1C simplified models, see their Figure 11, 12, 13 and 14. 44  SIRUNYAN 2018AR searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events containing two opposite-charge, same-flavour leptons (electrons or muons), jets and $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4C simplified model, see their Figure 7. Limits are also set on the chargino/neutralino mass in the Tchi1n2F simplified models, see their Figure 8, and on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1B and Tn1n1C simplified models, see their Figure 9. Finally, limits are set on the sbottom mass in the Tsbot3 simplified model, see their Figure 10. 45  SIRUNYAN 2018DN searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and for pair production of top squarks in events with two leptons (electrons or muons) of the opposite electric charge. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass in the Tchi1chi1C and Tchi1chi1E simplified models, see their Figure 8. Limits are also set on the stop mass in the Tstop1 and Tstop2 simplified models, see their Figure 9. 46  SIRUNYAN 2018DP searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos or of chargino pairs in events with a tau lepton pair and significant missing transverse momentum. Both hadronic and leptonic decay modes are considered for the tau lepton. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass in the Tchi1chi1D and Tchi1n2 simplified models, see their Figures 14 and 15. Also, excluded stau pair production cross sections are shown in Figures 11, 12, and 13. 47  SIRUNYAN 2018X searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with one or more high-momentum Higgs bosons, decaying to pairs of photons, jets and $\not E_T$. The razor variables (${{\mathit M}_{{{R}}}}$ and ${{\mathit R}^{2}}$) are used to categorise the events. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the sbottom mass in the Tsbot4 simplified model and on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2E simplified model, see their Figure 5. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A and Tn1n1B simplified models, see their Figure 6. 48  KHACHATRYAN 2017L searched in about 19 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for events with two ${{\mathit \tau}}$ (at least one decaying hadronically) and $\not E_T$. In the Tchi1chi1C model, assuming decays via intermediate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}$ or ${{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\tau}}}}$ with equivalent mass, the observed limits rule out ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ masses up to 420 GeV for a massless ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$. See their Fig.5. 49  SIRUNYAN 2017AW searched in 35.9 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with a charged lepton (electron or muon), two jets identified as originating from a ${{\mathit b}}$-quark, and large $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of the chargino and the next-to-lightest neutralino in the Tchi1n2E simplified model, see their Figure 6. 50  AAD 2016AA summarized and extended ATLAS searches for electroweak supersymmetry in final states containing several charged leptons, $\not E_T$, with or without hadronic jets, in 20 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The paper reports the results of new interpretations and statistical combinations of previously published analyses, as well as new analyses. Exclusion limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are set on the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ mass in the Tchi1chi1B and Tchi1chi1C simplified models. See their Fig. 13. 51  AAD 2016AA summarized and extended ATLAS searches for electroweak supersymmetry in final states containing several charged leptons, $\not E_T$, with or without hadronic jets, in 20 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV. The paper reports the results of new interpretations and statistical combinations of previously published analyses, as well as new analyses. Exclusion limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are set on mass-degenerate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ masses in the Tchi1n2B, Tchi1n2C, and Tchi1n2D simplified models. See their Figs. 16, 17, and 18. Interpretations in phenomenological-MSSM, two-parameter Non Universal Higgs Masses (NUHM2), and gauge-mediated symmetry breaking (GMSB) models are also given in their Figs. 20, 21 and 22. 52  KHACHATRYAN 2016R searched in 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons, one electron or muon, and $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in a general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking model (GGM), for a wino-like neutralino NLSP scenario, see Fig. 5. Limits are also set in the Tglu1D and Tchi1n1A simplified models, see Fig. 6. The Tchi1n1A limit is reduced to 340 GeV for a branching ratio reduced by the weak mixing angle. 53  AAD 2015BA searched in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state containing a ${{\mathit W}}$ boson and a 125 GeV Higgs boson, plus missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of direct chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with the decays ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ having 100$\%$ branching fraction, see Fig. 8. A combination of the multiple final states for the Higgs decay yields the best limits (Fig. 8d). 54  AAD 2015CA searched in 20.3 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons and $\not E_T$, with or without leptons (${{\mathit e}}$, ${{\mathit \mu}}$). No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in the general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking model (GGM), for wino-like NLSP, see Fig. 9, 12 55  AAD 2014H searched in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final sate with three leptons and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of direct chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with decays to the lightest neutralino via either all three generations of leptons, staus only, gauge bosons, or Higgs bosons, see Fig. 7. An interpretation in the pMSSM is also given, see Fig. 8. 56  AAD 2014X searched in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for events with at least four leptons (electrons, muons, taus) in the final state. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the wino-like chargino mass in an R-parity violating simplified model where the decay ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}^{(*)\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \ell}^{\mp}}{{\mathit \nu}}$, takes place with a branching ratio of 100$\%$, see Fig. 8. 57  KHACHATRYAN 2014L searched in 19.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for evidence of chargino-neutralino ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ pair production with Higgs or ${{\mathit W}}$-bosons in the decay chain, leading to ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ final states with missing transverse energy. The decays of a Higgs boson to a photon pair are considered in conjunction with hadronic and leptonic decay modes of the ${{\mathit W}}$ bosons. No significant excesses over the expected SM backgrounds are observed. The results are interpreted in the context of simplified models where the decays ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ take place 100$\%$ of the time, see Figs. $22 - 23$. 58  AAD 2013 searched in 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV for charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state with three leptons (${{\mathit e}}$ and ${{\mathit \mu}}$) and missing transverse energy. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in the phenomenological MSSM, see Fig. 2 and 3, and in simplified models, see Fig. 4. For the simplified models with intermediate slepton decays, degenerate ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ masses up to 500 GeV are excluded at 95$\%$ C.L. for very large mass differences with the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$. Supersedes AAD 2012AS. 59  AAD 2013B searched in 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV for gauginos decaying to a final state with two leptons (${{\mathit e}}$ and ${{\mathit \mu}}$) and missing transverse energy. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Limits are derived in a simplified model of wino-like chargino pair production, where the chargino always decays to the lightest neutralino via an intermediate on-shell charged slepton, see Fig. 2(b). Chargino masses between 110 and 340 GeV are excluded at 95$\%$ C.L. for ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 10 GeV. Exclusion limits are also derived in the phenomenological MSSM, see Fig. 3. 60  AAD 2012CT searched in 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV for events containing four or more leptons (electrons or muons) and either moderate values of missing transverse momentum or large effective mass. No significant excess is found in the data. Limits are presented in a simplified model of R-parity violating supersymmetry in which charginos are pair-produced and then decay into a ${{\mathit W}}$-boson and a ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, which in turn decays through an RPV coupling into two charged leptons (${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit e}^{\mp}}$ or ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \mu}^{\mp}}$) and a neutrino. In this model, chargino masses up to 540 GeV are excluded at 95$\%$ C.L. for ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ above 300 GeV, see Fig. 3a. The limit deteriorates for lighter ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$. Limits are also set in an R-parity violating mSUGRA model, see Fig. 3b. 61  CHATRCHYAN 2012BJ searched in 4.98 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in events with at least two leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum. No significant excesses over the expected SM backgrounds are observed and 95$\%$ C.L. limits on the production cross section of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ pair production were set in a number of simplified models, see Figs. 7 to 12. 62  ABDALLAH 2003M uses data from $\sqrt {s }$ = $192 - 208$ GeV to obtain limits in the framework of the MSSM with gaugino and sfermion mass universality at the GUT scale. An indirect limit on the mass of charginos is derived by constraining the MSSM parameter space by the results from direct searches for neutralinos (including cascade decays), for charginos and for sleptons. These limits are valid for values of $\mathit M_{2}<$ 1 TeV, $\vert {{\mathit \mu}}\vert {}\leq{}$2 TeV with the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ as LSP. Constraints from the Higgs search in the $\mathit m{}^{{\mathrm {max}}}_{h}$ scenario assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$= 174.3$~$GeV are included. The quoted limit applies if there is no mixing in the third family or when ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}_{{{1}}}}}\text{-}{\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}>$ 6 GeV. If mixing is included the limit degrades to 90 GeV. See Fig.~43 for the mass limits as a function of tan $\beta $. These limits update the results of ABREU 2000W. 63  AAD 2020AN searched in 139 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV for events with two photons and missing transverse momentum. Events are further categorised in terms of lepton or jet multiplicity. No significant excess over the expected background is observed. Limits at 95$\%$ C.L. are derived in Tchi1n2E simplified models. Next-to-lightest neutralinos and charginos with masses up to 310 GeV for a massless lightest neutralino are excluded. See their Fig. 10. 64  KHACHATRYAN 2016AA searched in 7.4 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons, hadronic jets and $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in the general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking model (GGM), for a wino-like neutralino NLSP scenario and with the wino mass fixed at 10 GeV above the bino mass, see Fig. 4. Limits are also set in the Tchi1chi1A and Tchi1n1A simplified models, see Fig. 3. 65  KHACHATRYAN 2016R searched in 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons, one electron or muon, and $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are also set in the Tglu1F simplified model, see Fig. 6. 66  KHACHATRYAN 2016Y searched in 19.7 ${\mathrm {fb}}{}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for events with one or two soft isolated leptons, hadronic jets, and $\not E_T$. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ mass (which is degenerate with the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$) in the Tchi1n2A simplified model, see Fig. 4. 67  AAD 2014AV searched in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for the direct production of charginos, neutralinos and staus in events containing at last two hadronically decaying ${{\mathit \tau}}$-leptons, large missing transverse momentum and low jet activity. The quoted limit was derived for direct ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ production with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}{{\mathit \nu}}$( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\tau}}}}{{\mathit \tau}}$) $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}}$ = ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}}$ = 0.5 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ + ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV. No excess over the expected SM background is observed. Exclusion limits are set in simplified models of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ pair production, see their Figure 7. Upper limits on the cross section and signal strength for direct di-stau production are derived, see Figures 8 and 9. Also, limits are derived in a pMSSM model where the only light slepton is the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}_{{{R}}}}$, see Figure 10. 68  AAD 2014AV searched in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for the direct production of charginos, neutralinos and staus in events containing at last two hadronically decaying ${{\mathit \tau}}$-leptons, large missing transverse momentum and low jet activity. The quoted limit was derived for direct ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ production with ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}{{\mathit \nu}}$( ${{\widetilde{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\tau}}}}{{\mathit \tau}}$) $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}}}$ = 0.5 (${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}}$ + ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$), ${\mathit m}_{{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{0}}}$ = 0 GeV. No excess over the expected SM background is observed. Exclusion limits are set in simplified models of ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\mp}}$ and ${{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{1}}}^{\pm}}{{\widetilde{\mathit \chi}}_{{{2}}}^{0}}$ pair production, see their Figure 7. Upper limits on the cross section and signal strength for direct di-stau production are derived, see Figures 8 and 9. Also, limits are derived in a pMSSM model where the only light slepton is the ${{\widetilde{\mathit \tau}}_{{{R}}}}$, see Figure 10. 69  AAD 2014G searched in 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for electroweak production of chargino pairs, or chargino-neutralino pairs, decaying to a final sate with two leptons (${{\mathit e}}$ and ${{\mathit \mu}}$) and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of chargino pair production, with chargino decays to the lightest neutralino via either sleptons or gauge bosons, see Fig 5.; or in simplified models of chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with decays to the lightest neutralino via gauge bosons, see Fig. 7. An interpretation in the pMSSM is also given, see Fig. 10. 70  AALTONEN 2014 searched in 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV for evidence of chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino associated production in final states consisting of three leptons (electrons, muons or taus) and large missing transverse momentum. The results are consistent with the Standard Model predictions within 1.85 $\sigma $. Limits on the chargino mass are derived in an mSUGRA model with ${\mathit m}_{\mathrm {0}}$ = 60 GeV, tan ${{\mathit \beta}}$ = 3, ${{\mathit A}_{{{0}}}}$ = 0 and ${{\mathit \mu}}$ $>$0, see their Fig. 2. 71  KHACHATRYAN 2014I searched in 19.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV for electroweak production of chargino pairs decaying to a final state with opposite-sign lepton pairs (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$) and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models, see Fig. 18. 72  AALTONEN 2013Q searched in 6.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 1.96 TeV for evidence of chargino-neutralino associated production in like-sign dilepton final states. One lepton is identified as the hadronic decay of a tau lepton, while the other is an electron or muon. Good agreement with the Standard Model predictions is observed and limits are set on the chargino-neutralino cross section for simplified gravity- and gauge-mediated models, see their Figs. 2 and 3. 73  AAD 2012AS searched in 2.06 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV for charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state with three leptons (${{\mathit e}}$ and ${{\mathit \mu}}$) and missing transverse energy. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in the phenomenological MSSM, see Fig. 2 (top), and in simplified models, see Fig. 2 (bottom). 74  AAD 2012T looked in 1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV for the production of supersymmetric particles decaying into final states with missing transverse momentum and exactly two isolated leptons (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$). Opposite-sign and same-sign dilepton events were separately studied. Additionally, in opposite-sign events, a search was made for an excess of same-flavor over different-flavor lepton pairs. No excess over the expected background is observed and limits are placed on the effective production cross section of opposite-sign dilepton events with $\not E_T$ $>$ 250 GeV and on same-sign dilepton events with $\not E_T$ $>$ 100 GeV. The latter limit is interpreted in a simplified electroweak gaugino production model as a lower chargino mass limit. 75  CHATRCHYAN 2011B looked in 35 pb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$=7 TeV for events with an isolated lepton (${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$), a photon and $\not E_T$ which may arise in a generalized gauge mediated model from the decay of Wino-like NLSPs. No evidence for an excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived in the plane of squark/gluino mass versus Wino mass (see Fig. 4). Mass degeneracy of the produced squarks and gluinos is assumed. 76  CHATRCHYAN 2011V looked in 35 pb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 TeV for events with ${}\geq{}$3 isolated leptons (${{\mathit e}}$, ${{\mathit \mu}}$ or ${{\mathit \tau}}$), with or without jets and $\not E_T$. No evidence for an excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived in the CMSSM (${{\mathit m}_{{{0}}}}$, ${{\mathit m}_{{{1/2}}}}$) plane for tan ${{\mathit \beta}}$ = 3 (see Fig. 5).

References