$
\bf{\text{>13.1 none 17.4 - 29.5}}
$
|
> 21.8
|
95 |
1 |
|
ATLS |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
|
|
2 |
|
ATLS |
$
>12.8
$
|
>17.5
|
95 |
3 |
|
CMS |
$
> 11.5
$
|
> 14.7
|
95 |
4 |
|
CMS |
$
> 12.0
$
|
> 17.5
|
95 |
5 |
|
ATLS |
|
|
6 |
|
ATLS |
|
|
7 |
|
ATLS |
$
> 8.1
$
|
> 12.0
|
95 |
8 |
|
ATLS |
$
> 9.0
$
|
> 11.7
|
95 |
9 |
|
CMS |
$> 5$ |
95 |
10 |
|
RVUE |
1
AABOUD 2017AK limit is from dijet angular distribution in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV. ${{\mathit u}}$, ${{\mathit d}}$, and ${{\mathit s}}$ quarks are assumed to be composite.
|
2
AABOUD 2018AV obtain limit on ${{\mathit t}_{{R}}}$ compositeness 2${{\mathit \pi}}/{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{RR}}^{2}}$ $<$ 1.6 TeV${}^{-2}$ at 95$\%$ CL from ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ production in the ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
|
3
SIRUNYAN 2018DD limit is from dijet angular distribution in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt {s }$ = 13 TeV.
|
4
SIRUNYAN 2017F limit is from dijet angular cross sections in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. All quarks are assumed to be composite.
|
5
AAD 2016S limit is from dijet angular selections in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. ${{\mathit u}}$, ${{\mathit d}}$, and ${{\mathit s}}$ quarks are assumed to be composite.
|
6
AAD 2015AR obtain limit on the ${{\mathit t}_{{R}}}$ compositeness 2$\pi /{{\mathit \Lambda}_{{RR}}^{2}}$ $<$ 6.6 TeV${}^{-2}$ at 95$\%$ CL from the ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ production in the ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV.
|
7
AAD 2015BY obtain limit on the ${{\mathit t}_{{R}}}$ compositeness 2$\pi /{{\mathit \Lambda}}{}^{2}_{RR}$ $<$ 15.1 TeV${}^{-2}$ at 95$\%$ CL from the ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ production in the ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV.
|
8
AAD 2015L limit is from dijet angular distribution in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. ${{\mathit u}}$, ${{\mathit d}}$, and ${{\mathit s}}$ quarks are assumed to be composite.
|
9
KHACHATRYAN 2015J limit is from dijet angular distribution in ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. ${{\mathit u}}$, ${{\mathit d}}$, ${{\mathit s}}$, ${{\mathit c}}$, and ${{\mathit b}}$ quarks are assumed to be composite.
|
10
FABBRICHESI 2014 obtain bounds on chromoelectric and chromomagnetic form factors of the top-quark using ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ and ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ cross sections. The quoted limit on the ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}$ contact interaction is derived from their bound on the chromoelectric form factor.
|