| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
| $> 3.1$ |
95 |
1 |
|
ZEUS |
|
|
2 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
3 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
4 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
5 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
6 |
|
RVUE |
| $\text{> 14}$ |
95 |
7 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
8 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
9 |
|
RVUE |
| $> 2.5$ |
95 |
10 |
|
H1 |
|
|
11 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
12 |
|
H1 |
| $> 0.49$ |
95 |
13 |
|
ALEP |
|
|
14 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
15 |
|
ZEUS |
| $>1.7$ |
96 |
16 |
|
H1 |
| $> 46$ |
90 |
17 |
|
BELL |
|
|
18 |
|
ZEUS |
| $>1.7$ |
95 |
19 |
|
RVUE |
| $>0.39$ |
95 |
20 |
|
L3 |
| $>1.5$ |
95 |
21 |
|
H1 |
| $>0.2$ |
95 |
22 |
|
ALEP |
|
|
23 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
24 |
|
RVUE |
| $>0.74$ |
95 |
25 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
26 |
|
OPAL |
| $>19.3$ |
95 |
27 |
|
CDF |
|
|
28 |
|
L3 |
|
|
29 |
|
OPAL |
| $>0.76$ |
95 |
30 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
31 |
|
ZEUS |
|
|
32 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
33 |
|
RVUE |
| $>1200$ |
|
34 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
35 |
|
RVUE |
| $>0.3$ |
95 |
36 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
37 |
|
RVUE |
| $>18$ |
|
38 |
|
RVUE |
| $>0.43$ |
95 |
39 |
|
RVUE |
| $>0.44$ |
95 |
39 |
|
RVUE |
|
|
40 |
|
RVUE |
| $>1$ |
|
41 |
|
RVUE |
| $>125$ |
|
41 |
|
RVUE |
|
1
ABRAMOWICZ 2019 obtain a limit on $\lambda /{{\mathit M}_{{LQ}}}$ $>$ 1.16 TeV${}^{-1}$ for weak isotriplet spin-0 leptoquark ${{\mathit S}_{{1}}^{L}}$. We obtain the limit quoted above by converting the limit on $\lambda /{{\mathit M}_{{LQ}}}$ for ${{\mathit S}_{{1}}^{L}}$ assuming $\lambda $ = $\sqrt {4 \pi }$. See their Table 5 for the limits of leptoquarks with different quantum numbers. These limits are derived from bounds of ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit q}}$ contact interactions.
|
|
2
MANDAL 2019 give bounds on leptoquarks from ${{\mathit \tau}}$-decays, leptonic dipole moments, lepton-flavor-violating processes, and ${{\mathit K}}$ decays.
|
|
3
ZHANG 2018A give bounds on leptoquark induced four-fermion interactions from ${{\mathit D}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ . The authors inform us that the shape parameter of the vector form factor in both the abstract and the conclusions of ZHANG 2018A should be $\mathit r_{+1}$ = $2.16$ $\pm0.07$ rather than $\pm0.007$. The numbers listed in their Table 7 are correct.
|
|
4
BARRANCO 2016 give bounds on leptoquark induced four-fermion interactions from ${{\mathit D}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit K}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ and ${{\mathit D}_{{s}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ .
|
|
5
KUMAR 2016 gives bound on SU(2) singlet scalar leptoquark with chrge $−$1/3 from ${{\mathit K}^{0}}−{{\overline{\mathit K}}^{0}}$ mixing, ${{\mathit K}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \pi}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}$ , ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{+}}{{\mathit \mu}^{-}}$ , and ${{\mathit K}_L^0}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{\pm}}{{\mathit e}^{\mp}}$ decays.
|
|
6
BESSAA 2015 obtain limit on leptoquark induced four-fermion interactions from the ATLAS and CMS limit on the ${{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit e}}}{{\mathit e}}$ contact interactions.
|
|
7
SAHOO 2015A obtain limit on leptoquark induced four-fermion interactions from ${{\mathit B}}$ $_{s,d}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}^{+}}{{\mathit \mu}^{-}}$ for $\lambda $ $\simeq{}$ $\mathit O$(1).
|
|
8
SAKAKI 2013 explain the ${{\mathit B}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit D}^{(*)}}{{\mathit \tau}}{{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}$ anomaly using Wilson coefficients of leptoquark-induced four-fermion operators.
|
|
9
KOSNIK 2012 obtains limits on leptoquark induced four-fermion interactions from ${{\mathit b}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit s}}{{\mathit \ell}^{+}}{{\mathit \ell}^{-}}$ decays.
|
|
10
AARON 2011C limit is for weak isotriplet spin-0 leptoquark at strong coupling ${{\mathit \lambda}}$ = $\sqrt {4\pi }$. For the limits of leptoquarks with different quantum numbers, see their Table 3. Limits are derived from bounds of ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit q}}$ contact intereractions.
|
|
11
DORSNER 2011 give bounds on scalar, weak singlet, charge 4/3 leptoquark from ${{\mathit K}}$, ${{\mathit B}}$, ${{\mathit \tau}}$ decays, meson mixings, $\mathit LFV$, $\mathit g−$2 and ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ .
|
|
12
AKTAS 2007A search for lepton-flavor violation in ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision. See their Tables $4 - 7$ for limits on lepton-flavor violating four-fermion interactions induced by various leptoquarks.
|
|
13
SCHAEL 2007A limit is for the weak-isoscalar spin-0 left-handed leptoquark with the coupling of electromagnetic strength. For the limits of leptoquarks with different quantum numbers, see their Table 35.
|
|
14
SMIRNOV 2007 obtains mass limits for the vector and scalar chiral leptoquark states from ${{\mathit K}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \mu}}$ , ${{\mathit B}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ decays.
|
|
15
CHEKANOV 2005 search for various leptoquarks with lepton-flavor violating couplings. See their Figs.6--10 and Tables 1--8 for detailed limits.
|
|
16
ADLOFF 2003 limit is for the weak isotriplet spin-0 leptoquark at strong coupling $\lambda =\sqrt {4{{\mathit \pi}} }$. For the limits of leptoquarks with different quantum numbers, see their Table$~$3. Limits are derived from bounds on ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit q}}$ contact interactions.
|
|
17
The bound is derived from B( ${{\mathit B}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \mu}^{\mp}}$ ) $<$ $1.7 \times 10^{-7}$.
|
|
18
CHEKANOV 2002 search for lepton-flavor violation in ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions. See their Tables$~1 - 4$ for limits on lepton-flavor violating and four-fermion interactions induced by various leptoquarks.
|
|
19
CHEUNG 2001B quoted limit is for a scalar, weak isoscalar, charge $−$1/3 leptoquark with a coupling of electromagnetic strength. The limit is derived from bounds on contact interactions in a global electroweak analysis. For the limits of leptoquarks with different quantum numbers, see Table$~$5.
|
|
20
ACCIARRI 2000P limit is for the weak isoscalar spin-0 leptoquark with the coupling of electromagnetic strength. For the limits of leptoquarks with different quantum numbers, see their Table$~$4.
|
|
21
ADLOFF 2000 limit is for the weak isotriplet spin-0 leptoquark at strong coupling, $\lambda =\sqrt {4\pi }$. For the limits of leptoquarks with different quantum numbers, see their Table$~$2. ADLOFF 2000 limits are from the $\mathit Q{}^{2}$ spectrum measurement of ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ X.
|
|
22
BARATE 2000I search for deviations in cross section and jet-charge asymmetry in ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit q}}}{{\mathit q}}$ due to $\mathit t$-channel exchange of a leptoquark at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$=130 to 183 GeV. Limits for other scalar and vector leptoquarks are also given in their Table$~$22.
|
|
23
BARGER 2000 explain the deviation of atomic parity violation in cesium atoms from prediction is explained by scalar leptoquark exchange.
|
|
24
GABRIELLI 2000 calculate various process with lepton flavor violation in leptoquark models.
|
|
25
ZARNECKI 2000 limit is derived from data of HERA, LEP, and Tevatron and from various low-energy data including atomic parity violation. Leptoquark coupling with electromagnetic strength is assumed.
|
|
26
ABBIENDI 1999 limits are from ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ cross section at $130 - 136$, $161 - 172$, 183 GeV. See their Fig.$~$8 and Fig.$~$9 for limits in mass-coupling plane.
|
|
27
ABE 1998V quoted limit is from B( ${{\mathit B}_{{s}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \mu}^{\mp}}$ )$<8.2 \times 10^{-6}$. ABE 1998V also obtain a similar limit on $\mathit M_{LQ}>20.4$ TeV from B( ${{\mathit B}_{{d}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{\pm}}{{\mathit \mu}^{\mp}}$ )$<4.5 \times 10^{-6}$. Both bounds assume the non-canonical association of the ${{\mathit b}}~$quark with electrons or muons under SU(4).
|
|
28
ACCIARRI 1998J limit is from ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ cross section at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$= $130 - 172$ GeV which can be affected by the ${{\mathit t}}-~$and ${{\mathit u}}$-channel exchanges of leptoquarks. See their Fig.$~$4 and Fig.$~$5 for limits in the mass-coupling plane.
|
|
29
ACKERSTAFF 1998V limits are from ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ and ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ cross sections at $\sqrt {\mathit s }$ = $130 - 172$ GeV, which can be affected by the $\mathit t$- and $\mathit u$-channel exchanges of leptoquarks. See their Fig.$~$21 and Fig.$~$22 for limits of leptoquarks in mass-coupling plane.
|
|
30
DEANDREA 1997 limit is for ${{\widetilde{\mathit R}}_{{2}}}$ leptoquark obtained from atomic parity violation (APV). The coupling of leptoquark is assumed to be electromagnetic strength. See Table$~$2 for limits of the four-fermion interactions induced by various scalar leptoquark exchange. DEANDREA 1997 combines APV limit and limits from Tevatron and HERA. See Fig.$~1 - 4$ for combined limits of leptoquark in mass-coupling plane.
|
|
31
DERRICK 1997 search for lepton-flavor violation in ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision. See their Tables$~$2--5 for limits on lepton-flavor violating four-fermion interactions induced by various leptoquarks.
|
|
32
GROSSMAN 1997 estimate the upper bounds on the branching fraction ${{\mathit B}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}^{+}}{{\mathit \tau}^{-}}$ (X) from the absence of the ${{\mathit B}}$ decay with large missing energy. These bounds can be used to constrain leptoquark induced four-fermion interactions.
|
|
33
JADACH 1997 limit is from ${{\mathit e}^{+}}$ ${{\mathit e}^{-}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ cross section at $\sqrt {\mathit s }=172.3$ GeV which can be affected by the ${{\mathit t}}$- and ${{\mathit u}}$-channel exchanges of leptoquarks. See their Fig.$~$1 for limits on vector leptoquarks in mass-coupling plane.
|
|
34
KUZNETSOV 1995B use ${{\mathit \pi}}$, ${{\mathit K}}$, ${{\mathit B}}$, ${{\mathit \tau}}$ decays and ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit e}}$ conversion and give a list of bounds on the leptoquark mass and the fermion mixing matrix in the Pati-Salam model. The quoted limit is from ${{\mathit K}_{{L}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit e}}$ decay assuming zero mixing.
|
|
35
MIZUKOSHI 1995 calculate the one-loop radiative correction to the ${{\mathit Z}}$-physics parameters in various scalar leptoquark models. See their Fig.$~$4 for the exclusion plot of third generation leptoquark models in mass-coupling plane.
|
|
36
BHATTACHARYYA 1994 limit is from one-loop radiative correction to the leptonic decay width of the ${{\mathit Z}}$. ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$=250 GeV, ${{\mathit \alpha}_{{s}}}({\mathit m}_{{{\mathit Z}}})=0.12$, ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit t}}}$=180 GeV, and the electroweak strength of leptoquark coupling are assumed. For leptoquark coupled to ${{\overline{\mathit e}}_{{L}}}{{\mathit t}_{{R}}}$ , ${{\overline{\mathit \mu}}}{{\mathit t}}$ , and ${{\overline{\mathit \tau}}}{{\mathit t}}$ , see Fig.$~$2 in BHATTACHARYYA 1994B erratum and Fig.$~$3.
|
|
37
DAVIDSON 1994 gives an extensive list of the bounds on leptoquark-induced four-fermion interactions from ${{\mathit \pi}}$, ${{\mathit K}}$, ${{\mathit D}}$, ${{\mathit B}}$, ${{\mathit \mu}}$, ${{\mathit \tau}}$ decays and meson mixings, $\mathit etc$. See Table$~$15 of DAVIDSON 1994 for detail.
|
|
38
KUZNETSOV 1994 gives mixing independent bound of the Pati-Salam leptoquark from the cosmological limit on ${{\mathit \pi}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ .
|
|
39
LEURER 1994 , LEURER 1994B limits are obtained from atomic parity violation and apply to any chiral leptoquark which couples to the first generation with electromagnetic strength. For a nonchiral leptoquark, universality in ${{\mathit \pi}}_{{{\mathit \ell}}2}$ decay provides a much more stringent bound.
|
|
40
MAHANTA 1994 gives bounds of $\mathit P$- and $\mathit T$-violating scalar-leptoquark couplings from atomic and molecular experiments.
|
|
41
From ( ${{\mathit \pi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ )$/$( ${{\mathit \pi}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ ) ratio. SHANKER 1982 assumes the leptoquark induced four-fermion coupling 4$\mathit g{}^{2}/\mathit M{}^{2}$ (${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}_{\mathit eL}$ $\mathit u_{\mathit R}$) ( ${{\overline{\mathit d}}_{{L}}}{{\mathit e}_{{R}}}$ )with $\mathit g=0.004$ for spin-0 leptoquark and $\mathit g{}^{2}/\mathit M{}^{2}$ (${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}}_{\mathit eL}$ ${{\mathit \gamma}_{{\mu}}}{{\mathit u}_{{L}}}$ ) (${{\overline{\mathit d}}_{{R}}}$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{}^{{{\mathit \mu}}}$ ${{\mathit e}_{{R}}}$ ) with $\mathit g≅0.6$ for spin-1 leptoquark.
|
