(C) Other neutrino mixing results

The LSND collaboration reported in AGUILAR 2001 a signal which is consistent with ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\mu}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{e}}}}$ oscillations. In a three neutrino framework, this would be a measurement of $\theta _{12}$ and $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}_{21}$. This does not appear to be consistent with most of the other neutrino data. The following listings include results from ${{\mathit \nu}_{{{\mu}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \nu}_{{{e}}}}$, ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\mu}}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{e}}}}$ appearance and ${{\mathit \nu}_{{{\mu}}}}$, ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{\mu}}}}$, ${{\mathit \nu}_{{{e}}}}$, and ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{{e}}}}$ disappearance experiments, and searches for $\mathit CPT$ violation.

$\langle \Delta {{\mathit m}^{2}}_{\mathrm {32}}−\Delta {{\overline{\mathit m}}}{}^{2}_{32}\rangle $

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S067CP2
VALUE ($ 10^{-3} $ eV${}^{2}$) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$-0.12$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ 1
ADAMSON
2013B
 MINS beam and atmosperic
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$0.6$ ${}^{+2.4}_{-0.8}$ 90 2
ADAMSON
2012B
 MINS MINOS atmospheric
1  ADAMSON 2013B quotes this difference as a negative of our convention.
2  The quoted result is the single-parameter 90$\%$ C.L. interval determined from the 90$\%$ C.L. contour in the ($\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$, $\Delta \bar m{}^{2}$) plane, which is obtained by minimizing the four parameter log-likelihood function with respect to the other oscillation parameters.
Conservation Laws:
$\mathit CPT$ INVARIANCE
References