| • • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
| $0.023\text{ to }0.060 $ |
90 |
1 |
|
MBNE |
| $<0.16$ |
90 |
2 |
|
MBNE |
| $\text{0.03 - 0.09}$ |
90 |
3 |
|
MBNE |
| $\text{0.03 - 0.07}$ |
90 |
4 |
|
MBNE |
| $<0.06$ |
90 |
|
|
MBNE |
| $<0.055$ |
90 |
5 |
|
KAR2 |
| $<2.6$ |
90 |
|
|
NTEV |
| $\text{0.03 - 0.05}$ |
|
6 |
|
LSND |
| $\text{0.05 - 0.08}$ |
90 |
7 |
|
LSND |
| $\text{0.048 - 0.090}$ |
80 |
8 |
|
|
| $<0.07$ |
90 |
9 |
|
|
| $<0.9$ |
90 |
|
|
CHM2 |
| $<0.14$ |
90 |
10 |
|
CNTR |
|
1
Based on ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ appearance of $78.4$ $\pm28.5$ events. The best fit values are $\Delta $m${}^{2}$ = 0.043 eV${}^{2}$ and sin$^22\theta $ = 0.88.
|
|
2
CHENG 2012 is a combined fit of MiniBooNE and SciBooNE antineutrino data.
|
|
3
This value is for a two neutrino oscillation analysis for excess antineutrino events with E$_{{{\mathit \nu}}}>$ 475 MeV. The best fit is at 0.07. The allowed region is consistent with LSND reported by AGUILAR 2001 . Supercedes AGUILAR-AREVALO 2009B.
|
|
4
This value is for a two neutrino oscillation analysis for excess antineutrino events with E$_{{{\mathit \nu}}}>$ 200 MeV with subtraction of the expected 12 events low energy excess seen in the neutrino component of the beam. The best fit value is 0.007 for $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$ = 4.4 eV${}^{2}$.
|
|
5
ARMBRUSTER 2002 is the final analysis of the KARMEN$~$2 data for $17.7~$m distance from the ISIS stopped pion and muon neutrino source. It is a search for ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$, detected by the inverse $\beta $-decay reaction on protons and ${}^{12}\mathrm {C}$. 15 candidate events are observed, and $15.8$ $\pm0.5$ background events are expected, hence no oscillation signal is detected. The results exclude large regions of the parameter area favored by the LSND experiment.
|
|
6
AGUILAR 2001 is the final analysis of the LSND full data set. It is a search for ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ 30$~$m from LAMPF beam stop. Neutrinos originate mainly for ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ decay at rest. ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ are detected through ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ (20$<\mathit E_{{{\mathit e}^{+}}}<60$ MeV) in delayed coincidence with ${{\mathit n}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit d}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ . Authors observe $87.9$ $\pm22.4$ $\pm6.0$ total excess events. The observation is attributed to ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ oscillations with the oscillation probability of $0.264$ $\pm0.067$ $\pm0.045\%$, consistent with the previously published result. Taking into account all constraints, the most favored allowed region of oscillation parameters is a band of $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$ from $0.2 - 2.0~$eV${}^{2}$. Supersedes ATHANASSOPOULOS 1995 , ATHANASSOPOULOS 1996 , and ATHANASSOPOULOS 1998 .
|
|
7
ATHANASSOPOULOS 1996 is a search for ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ 30$~$m from LAMPF beam stop. Neutrinos originate mainly from ${{\mathit \pi}^{+}}$ decay at rest. ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ could come from either ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ or ${{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ ; our entry assumes the first interpretation. They are detected through ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ (20$~$MeV $<\mathit E_{{{\mathit e}^{+}}}<$60 MeV) in delayed coincidence with ${{\mathit n}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit d}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ . Authors observe $51$ $\pm20$ $\pm8$ total excess events over an estimated background $12.5$ $\pm2.9$. ATHANASSOPOULOS 1996B is a shorter version of this paper.
|
|
8
ATHANASSOPOULOS 1995 error corresponds to the $1.6\sigma $ band in the plot. The expected background is $2.7$ $\pm0.4$ events. Corresponds to an oscillation probability of ($0.34$ ${}^{+0.20}_{-0.18}$ $\pm0.07)\%$. For a different interpretation, see HILL 1995 . Replaced by ATHANASSOPOULOS 1996 .
|
|
9
HILL 1995 is a report by one member of the LSND Collaboration, reporting a different conclusion from the analysis of the data of this experiment (see ATHANASSOPOULOS 1995 ). Contrary to the rest of the LSND Collaboration, Hill finds no evidence for the neutrino oscillation ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ and obtains only upper limits.
|
|
10
FREEDMAN 1993 is a search at LAMPF for ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ generated from any of the three neutrino types ${{\mathit \nu}_{{\mu}}}$, ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$, and ${{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ which come from the beam stop. The ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$'s would be detected by the reaction ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}^{+}}{{\mathit n}}$ . FREEDMAN 1993 replaces DURKIN 1988 .
|
