POLARIZATION IN ${{\mathit B}_{{{s}}}^{0}}$ DECAY

In decays involving two vector mesons, one can distinguish among the states in which meson polarizations are both longitudinal ($\mathit L$), or both are transverse and parallel ($\parallel$), or perpendicular ($\perp$) to each other with the parameters $\Gamma _{L}/\Gamma $, $\Gamma _{\perp}/\Gamma $, and the relative phases $\phi _{\parallel}$ and $\phi _{\perp}$. In decays involving two tensor mesons, the transverse polarization states are described by parameters $\Gamma _{\parallel1}$, $\Gamma _{\parallel2}$, $\Gamma _{\perp1}$, $\Gamma _{\perp2}$ and their relative phases $\phi _{\parallel1}$, $\phi _{\parallel2}$, $\phi _{\perp1}$, $\phi _{\perp2}$. See also the review on “Polarization in ${{\mathit B}}$ Decays.''

$\phi _{\parallel}$ in ${{\mathit B}_{{{s}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit J / \psi}{(1S)}}{{\mathit \phi}}$

INSPIRE   JSON  (beta) PDGID:
S086P03
VALUE (rad) DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 3.22 \pm0.05}$ OUR AVERAGE
$3.146$ $\pm0.061$ $\pm0.052$ 1
AAIJ
2024A
LHCB ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 13 TeV
$3.36$ $\pm0.05$ $\pm0.09$ 2
AAD
2021AE
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 7, 8, 13 TeV
$3.19$ $\pm0.12$ $\pm0.04$
SIRUNYAN
2021E
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 8, 13 TeV
$3.15$ $\pm0.22$ 3
ABAZOV
2012D
D0 ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ at 1.96 TeV
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$3.18$ $\pm0.12$ $\pm0.003$
SIRUNYAN
2021E
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 13 TeV
$3.06$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ $\pm0.04$
AAIJ
2019Q
LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2024A
$3.15$ $\pm0.10$ $\pm0.05$
AAD
2016AP
ATLS Repl. by AAD 2021AE
$3.48$ ${}^{+0.07}_{-0.09}$ $\pm0.68$
KHACHATRYAN
2016S
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ at 8 TeV
$3.26$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.17}$ ${}^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$
AAIJ
2015I
LHCB Repl. by AAIJ 2019Q
$2.72$ ${}^{+1.12}_{-0.27}$ $\pm0.26$
ABAZOV
2009E
D0 Repl. by ABAZOV 2012D
1  Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of ${{\mathit B}_{{{s}}}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit J / \psi}}{{\mathit K}^{+}}{{\mathit K}^{-}}$ decays.
2  The fit found another solution with $\phi _{\parallel}$ = $2.95$ $\pm0.05$ $\pm0.09$ rad.
3  The error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.
References