${{\mathit H}}$ SIGNAL STRENGTHS IN DIFFERENT CHANNELS

The ${{\mathit H}}$ signal strength in a particular final state ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ is given by the cross section times branching ratio in this channel normalized to the Standard Model (SM) value, $\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$) $/$ ($\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}))_{{\mathrm {SM}}}$, for the specified mass value of ${{\mathit H}}$. For the SM predictions, see DITTMAIER 2011, DITTMAIER 2012, and HEINEMEYER 2013A. Results for fiducial and differential cross sections are also listed below.

Combined Final States

INSPIRE   PDGID:
S126SA
VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 1.03 \pm0.04}$ OUR AVERAGE
$1.05$ $\pm0.06$ 1
ATLAS
2022
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$1.002$ $\pm0.057$ 2
CMS
2022
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$1.09$ $\pm0.07$ $\pm0.04$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ 3, 4
AAD
2016AN
 LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$1.44$ ${}^{+0.59}_{-0.56}$ 5
AALTONEN
2013M
 TEVA ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$1.11$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ 6
AAD
2020
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$1.17$ $\pm0.10$ 7
SIRUNYAN
2019AT
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
8
SIRUNYAN
2019BA
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, diiferential cross sections
$1.20$ $\pm0.10$ $\pm0.06$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ 4
AAD
2016AN
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$0.97$ $\pm0.09$ $\pm0.05$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ 4
AAD
2016AN
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$1.18$ $\pm0.10$ $\pm0.07$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ 9
AAD
2016K
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$0.75$ ${}^{+0.28}_{-0.26}$ ${}^{+0.13}_{-0.11}$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ 9
AAD
2016K
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7 TeV
$1.28$ $\pm0.11$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ 9
AAD
2016K
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 8 TeV
10
AAD
2015P
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 8 TeV, cross section
$1.00$ $\pm0.09$ $\pm0.07$ ${}^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ 11
KHACHATRYAN
2015AM
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$1.33$ ${}^{+0.14}_{-0.10}$ $\pm0.15$ 12
AAD
2013AK
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7 and 8 TeV
$1.54$ ${}^{+0.77}_{-0.73}$ 13
AALTONEN
2013L
 CDF ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
$1.40$ ${}^{+0.92}_{-0.88}$ 14
ABAZOV
2013L
 D0 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
$1.4$ $\pm0.3$ 15
AAD
2012AI
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$1.2$ $\pm0.4$ 15
AAD
2012AI
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7 TeV
$1.5$ $\pm0.4$ 15
AAD
2012AI
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 8 TeV
$0.87$ $\pm0.23$ 16
CHATRCHYAN
2012N
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV
1  ATLAS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 1) using up to 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. The Higgs production cross-sections, branching fractions and several ratios are found in their Figs. 2 and 3.
2  CMS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 2) using 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. Signal strengths for production modes and decay channels are found in their Fig. 2.
3  AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.03$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ for gluon fusion, $1.18$ ${}^{+0.25}_{-0.23}$ for vector boson fusion, $0.89$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.38}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $0.79$ ${}^{+0.38}_{-0.36}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $2.3$ ${}^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.
4  AAD 2016AN: The uncertainties represent statistics, experimental systematics, and added in quadrature theory systematics on the background and on the signal. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. In the fit, relative branching ratios and relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model.
5  AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
6  AAD 2020 combine results of up to 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV: ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$, ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \mu}}$, invisible, and off-shell analyses (see their Table I). The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.04$ $\pm0.09$ for gluon fusion, $1.21$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ for vector boson fusion, $1.30$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.38}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $1.05$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.29}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.21$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}+{{\mathit t}}{{\mathit H}}$ production (see their Fig. 2 and Table IV). Several results with the simplified template cross section and $\kappa $-frameworks are presented: see their Figs. $9 - 11$, Figs 20, 21 and Table VIII for stage-1 simplified template cross sections, their Figs. $12 - 17$ and Tables X$-$XII for the $\kappa $-framework.
7  SIRUNYAN 2019AT combine results of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.22$ ${}^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$ for gluon fusion, $0.73$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.27}$ for vector boson fusion, $2.18$ ${}^{+0.58}_{-0.55}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $0.87$ ${}^{+0.44}_{-0.42}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.18$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.27}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production. Several results with the simplified template cross section and $\kappa $-frameworks are presented: see their Fig. 8 and Table 5 for stage-0 simplified template cross sections, their Figs. $9 - 18$ and Tables $7 - 11$ for the $\kappa $-framework.
8  SIRUNYAN 2019BA measure differential cross sections for the Higgs boson transverse momentum, the number of jets, the rapidity of the Higgs boson and the transverse momentum of the leading jet using 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$, and ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$. The total cross section for Higgs boson production is measured to be $61.1$ $\pm6.0$ $\pm3.7$ pb using ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ channels. Several coupling measurements in the $\kappa $-framework are performed.
9  AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The third uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The signal strengths for individual production modes are $1.23$ $\pm0.14$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}{}^{+0.16}_{-0.12}$ for gluon fusion, $1.23$ ${}^{+0.28}_{-0.27}{}^{+0.13}_{-0.12}{}^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ for vector boson fusion, $0.80$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.30}$ $\pm0.17$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.05}$ for ${{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.81$ ${}^{+0.52}_{-0.50}{}^{+0.58}_{-0.55}{}^{+0.31}_{-0.12}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
10  AAD 2015P measure total and differential cross sections of the process ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV with 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$. ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and 4${{\mathit \ell}}$ final states are used. ${\mathit \sigma (}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}{)}$ = $33.0$ $\pm5.3$ $\pm1.6$ pb is given. See their Figs. 2 and 3 for data on differential cross sections.
11  KHACHATRYAN 2015AM use up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The third uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. Fits to each production mode give the value of $0.85$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.16}$ for gluon fusion, $1.16$ ${}^{+0.37}_{-0.34}$ for vector boson fusion, $0.92$ ${}^{+0.38}_{-0.36}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $2.90$ ${}^{+1.08}_{-0.94}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.
12  AAD 2013AK use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The combined signal strength is based on the ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$, and ${{\mathit W}}$ ${{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ channels. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. Reported statistical error value modified following private communication with the experiment.
13  AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
14  ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
15  AAD 2012AI obtain results based on $4.6 - 4.8$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and $5.8 - 5.9$ fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. An excess of events over background with a local significance of 5.9 $\sigma $ is observed at ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also AAD 2012DA.
16  CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on $4.9 - 5.1$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and $5.1 - 5.3$ fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. An excess of events over background with a local significance of 5.0$~\sigma $ is observed at about ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. The combined signal strength is based on the ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$, ${{\mathit \tau}^{+}}{{\mathit \tau}^{-}}$, and ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ channels. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.
References