# ${{\boldsymbol H}^{0}}$ SIGNAL STRENGTHS IN DIFFERENT CHANNELS

The ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ signal strength in a particular final state ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ is given by the cross section times branching ratio in this channel normalized to the Standard Model (SM) value, $\sigma$ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ) $/$ ($\sigma$ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ ))$_{{\mathrm {SM}}}$, for the specified mass value of ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$. For the SM predictions, see DITTMAIER 2011 , DITTMAIER 2012 , and HEINEMEYER 2013A. Results for fiducial and differential cross sections are also listed below.

# ${{\boldsymbol b}}{{\overline{\boldsymbol b}}}$ Final State INSPIRE search

VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 1.04 \pm0.13}$ OUR AVERAGE
$1.12$ $\pm0.29$ 1
 2019 AT
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.16$ ${}^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$ 2
 2018 BN
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 13 TeV, 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$
$1.06$ $\pm0.26$ 3
 2018 DB
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 13 TeV, 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.70$ ${}^{+0.29}_{-0.27}$ 4, 5
 2016 AN
LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$1.59$ ${}^{+0.69}_{-0.72}$ 6
 2013 M
TEVA ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
7
 2019 U
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 13 TeV, cross sections
$0.98$ ${}^{+0.22}_{-0.21}$ 8
 2018 BN
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 7, 8, 13 TeV
$1.01$ $\pm0.20$ 9
 2018 BN
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , ggF, VBF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ 7, 8, 13 TeV
$2.5$ ${}^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ 10, 11
 2018 BQ
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , VBF, ggF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , 13 TeV
$3.0$ ${}^{+1.7}_{-1.6}$ 10, 12
 2018 BQ
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , VBF, 13 TeV
13
 2018 C
CDF ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$1.19$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.38}$ 14
 2018 AE
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 13 TeV
$1.06$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.29}$ 15
 2018 AE
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 7, 8, 13 TeV
$1.01$ $\pm0.22$ 16
 2018 DB
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 7, 8, 13 TeV
$1.04$ $\pm0.20$ 17
 2018 DB
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , ggF, VBF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ 7, 8, 13 TeV
$2.3$ ${}^{+1.8}_{-1.6}$ 18
 2018 E
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , boosted, 13 TeV
$1.20$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.23}$ ${}^{+0.34}_{-0.28}$ 19
 2017 BA
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 13 TeV, 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.90$ $\pm0.18$ ${}^{+0.21}_{-0.19}$ 20
 2017 BA
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ , 7, 8, 13 TeV
$-0.8$ $\pm1.3$ ${}^{+1.8}_{-1.9}$ 21
 2016 X
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , VBF, 8 TeV
$0.62$ $\pm0.37$ 5
 2016 AN
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.81$ ${}^{+0.45}_{-0.43}$ 5
 2016 AN
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.63$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.30}$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.23}$ 22
 2016 K
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$0.52$ $\pm0.32$ $\pm0.24$ 23
 2015 G
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$2.8$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-1.4}$ 24
 2015 Z
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , VBF, 8 TeV
$1.03$ ${}^{+0.44}_{-0.42}$ 25
 2015 Z
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ , 8 TeV, combined
$1.0$ $\pm0.5$ 26
 2014 AI
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
$1.72$ ${}^{+0.92}_{-0.87}$ 27
 2013 L
CDF ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$1.23$ ${}^{+1.24}_{-1.17}$ 28
 2013 L
D0 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$0.5$ $\pm2.2$ 29
 2012 AI
ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7 TeV
30
 2012 T
TEVA ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 1.96 TeV
$0.48$ ${}^{+0.81}_{-0.70}$ 31
 2012 N
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ , 7, 8 TeV
1  SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
2  AABOUD 2018BN search for ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ( ${{\mathit V}}$ = ${{\mathit W}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}$ ) using 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 4.9 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
3  SIRUNYAN 2018DB search for ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ( ${{\mathit V}}$ = ${{\mathit W}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}$ ) using 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 4.4 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
4  AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.0$ $\pm0.5$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production, $0.4$ $\pm0.4$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production, and $1.1$ $\pm1.0$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production.
5  AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
6  AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
7  AABOUD 2019U measure cross sections of ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ production as a function of the gauge boson transverse momentum using data of 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$. The kinematic fiducial volumes used is based on the simplified template cross section framework (reduced stage-1). See their Table 3 and Fig. 3.
8  AABOUD 2018BN combine results of 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with results of ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV.
9  AABOUD 2018BN combine results of ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7, 8 and 13 TeV with results of VBF (+gluon fusion) and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7, 8, and 13 TeV to perform a search for the ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ decay. The quoted signal strength assumes a SM production strength and corresponds to a significance of 5.4 standard deviations.
10  AABOUD 2018BQ search for ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ produced through vector-boson fusion (VBF) and VBF+${{\mathit \gamma}}$ with 30.6 fb${}^{-1}$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
11  The signal strength is measured including all production modes (VBF, ggF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ ).
12  The signal strength is measured for VBF-only and others (ggF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ ) are constrained to Standard Model expectations with uncertainties described in their Section VIII B.
13  AALTONEN 2018C use 5.4 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The upper limit at 95$\%$ CL on ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ is 33 times the SM predicion, which corresponds to a cross section of 40.6 pb.
14  SIRUNYAN 2018AE use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to 3.3 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
15  SIRUNYAN 2018AE combine the result of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with the results obtained from data of up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 18.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV (CHATRCHYAN 2014AI and KHACHATRYAN 2015Z). The quoted signal strength corresponds to 3.8 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
16  SIRUNYAN 2018DB combine the result of 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with the results obtained from data of up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 18.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 4.8 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
17  SIRUNYAN 2018DB combine results of 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with results of gluon fusion (ggF), VBF and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV, 8 TeV and 13 TeV to perform a search for the ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ decay. The quoted signal strength assumes a SM production strength and corresponds to a significance of 5.6 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
18  SIRUNYAN 2018E use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV. They measure ${{\mathit \sigma}}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$ for gluon fusion production of ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with $p_T>$450 GeV, $\vert \eta \vert <$2.5 to be $74$ $\pm48$ ${}^{+17}_{-10}$ fb.
19  AABOUD 2017BA use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV. They give ${\mathit \sigma (}$W H${)}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$( ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ) = $1.08$ ${}^{+0.54}_{-0.47}$ pb and ${\mathit \sigma (}$Z H${)}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$( ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ) = $0.57$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.23}$ pb.
20  AABOUD 2017BA combine 7, 8 and 13 TeV analyses. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
21  AABOUD 2016X search for vector-boson fusion production of ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
22  AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
23  AAD 2015G use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
24  KHACHATRYAN 2015Z search for vector-boson fusion production of ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in up to 19.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
25  KHACHATRYAN 2015Z combined vector boson fusion, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production, and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production results. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
26  CHATRCHYAN 2014AI use up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 18.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2014AJ.
27  AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
28  ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
29  AAD 2012AI obtain results based on $4.6 - 4.8$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given in their Fig. 10 for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also Fig. 13 of AAD 2012DA.
30  AALTONEN 2012T combine AALTONEN 2012Q, AALTONEN 2012R, AALTONEN 2012S, ABAZOV 2012O, ABAZOV 2012P, and ABAZOV 2012K. An excess of events over background is observed which is most significant in the region ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = $120 - 135$ GeV, with a local significance of up to 3.3 $\sigma$. The local significance at ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV is 2.8 $\sigma$, which corresponds to (${\mathit \sigma (}$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}{)}$ + ${\mathit \sigma (}$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit Z}}{)}$) $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ) = ($0.23$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$) pb, compared to the Standard Model expectation at ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV of $0.12$ $\pm0.01$ pb. Superseded by AALTONEN 2013M.
31  CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=7 TeV and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$=125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.
References:
 AABOUD 2019U
JHEP 1905 141 Measurement of VH, $\mathrm{H}\to \mathrm{b}\overline{\mathrm{b}}$ production as a function of the vector-boson transverse momentum in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector
 SIRUNYAN 2019AT
EPJ C79 421 Combined measurements of Higgs boson couplings in proton?proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {Te}\text {V}$
 AABOUD 2018BN
PL B786 59 Observation of $H \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ decays and $VH$ production with the ATLAS detector
 AABOUD 2018BQ
PR D98 052003 Search for Higgs bosons produced via vector-boson fusion and decaying into bottom quark pairs in $\sqrt{s} = 13$ $\mathrm{TeV}$ $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector
 AALTONEN 2018C
PR D98 072002 Search for standard-model Z and Higgs bosons decaying into a bottom-antibottom quark pair in proton-antiproton collisions at 1.96 TeV
 SIRUNYAN 2018AE
PL B780 501 Evidence for the Higgs boson decay to a bottom quark?antiquark pair
 SIRUNYAN 2018DB
PRL 121 121801 Observation of Higgs boson decay to bottom quarks
 SIRUNYAN 2018E
PRL 120 071802 Inclusive Search for a Highly Boosted Higgs Boson Decaying to a Bottom Quark-Antiquark Pair
 AABOUD 2017BA
JHEP 1712 024 Evidence for the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ Decay with the ATLAS Detector
 AABOUD 2016X
JHEP 1611 112 Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson Produced by Vector-Boson Fusion and Decaying to Bottom Quarks in $\sqrt {s }$ = 8 TeV ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collisions with the ATLAS Detector
EPJ C76 6 Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Coupling Strengths using ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ = 7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS Experiment
JHEP 1608 045 Measurements of the Higgs Boson Production and Decay Rates and Constraints on its Couplings from a Combined ATLAS and CMS Analysis of the LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ Collision Data at $\sqrt {s }$ =7 and 8 TeV
JHEP 1501 069 Search for the ${\mathit {\mathit b}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit b}}}$ Decay of the Standard Model Higgs Boson in Associated (${{\mathit W}}/{{\mathit Z}}){{\mathit H}}$ Production with the ATLAS Detector
 KHACHATRYAN 2015Z
PR D92 032008 Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson Produced through Vector Boson Fusion and Decaying to ${\mathit {\mathit b}}{\mathit {\overline{\mathit b}}}$
 CHATRCHYAN 2014AI
PR D89 012003 Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson Produced in Association with a ${{\mathit W}}$ or a ${{\mathit Z}}$ Boson and Decaying to Bottom Quarks
 AALTONEN 2013L
PR D88 052013 Combination of Searches for the Higgs Boson Using the Full CDF Data Set
 AALTONEN 2013M
PR D88 052014 Higgs Boson Studies at the Tevatron
 ABAZOV 2013L
PR D88 052011 Combined Search for the Higgs Boson with the ${D0}$ Experiment