${{\mathit H}}$ SIGNAL STRENGTHS IN DIFFERENT CHANNELS

The ${{\mathit H}}$ signal strength in a particular final state ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ is given by the cross section times branching ratio in this channel normalized to the Standard Model (SM) value, $\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B(${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$) $/$ ($\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B(${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}))_{{\mathrm {SM}}}$, for the specified mass value of ${{\mathit H}}$. For the SM predictions, see DITTMAIER 2011, DITTMAIER 2012, and HEINEMEYER 2013A. Results for fiducial and differential cross sections are also listed below.

${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ Final State

INSPIRE   JSON  (beta) PDGID:
S126SBB
VALUE DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$\bf{ 0.99 \pm0.12}$ OUR AVERAGE
$1.05$ ${}^{+0.22}_{-0.21}$ 1
CMS
2022
CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$1.02$ ${}^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$ ${}^{+0.14}_{-0.13}$ 2
AAD
2021AB
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, 139 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.95$ $\pm0.32$ ${}^{+0.20}_{-0.17}$ 3
AAD
2021AJ
 ATLS VBF, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, 126 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.70$ ${}^{+0.29}_{-0.27}$ 4, 5
AAD
2016AN
 LHC ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$1.59$ ${}^{+0.69}_{-0.72}$ 6
AALTONEN
2013M
 TEVA ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •
$1.4$ ${}^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$ 7
AAD
2024F
 ATLS ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$2.2$ ${}^{+0.9}_{-0.8}$ 8
HAYRAPETYAN
2024AM
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV
$4.9$ ${}^{+1.9}_{-1.6}$ 9
HAYRAPETYAN
2024AY
 CMS ggF, VBF, boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$1.6$ ${}^{+1.7}_{-1.5}$ 10
HAYRAPETYAN
2024AY
 CMS ggF, VBF, boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$1.01$ ${}^{+0.55}_{-0.46}$ 11
HAYRAPETYAN
2024U
 CMS VBF, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, 90.8 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.99$ ${}^{+0.48}_{-0.41}$ 12
HAYRAPETYAN
2024U
 CMS ggF, VBF, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, 90.8 fb${}^{-1}$
$-2.7$ ${}^{+5.6}_{-2.1}$ $\pm3.5$ 13
HAYRAPETYAN
2024U
 CMS ggF, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, 90.8 fb${}^{-1}$
$1.59$ ${}^{+0.63}_{-0.72}$ $\pm0.54$ 13
HAYRAPETYAN
2024U
 CMS VBF, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, 90.8 fb${}^{-1}$
$1.15$ ${}^{+0.22}_{-0.20}$ 14
TUMASYAN
2024
CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, 138 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.8$ $\pm3.2$ 15
AAD
2022X
 ATLS boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$0.95$ $\pm0.18$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.18}$ 2
AAD
2021AB
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, 139 fb${}^{-1}$
$1.08$ $\pm0.17$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.15}$ 2
AAD
2021AB
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, 139 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.72$ ${}^{+0.29}_{-0.28}$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.22}$ 16
AAD
2021H
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, boosted ${{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}$, 13 TeV, 139 fb${}^{-1}$
$1.3$ $\pm1.0$ 17
AAD
2021M
 ATLS VBF+${{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, 132 fb${}^{-1}$
$3.7$ $\pm1.2$ ${}^{+0.11}_{-0.9}$ 18
SIRUNYAN
2020BL
 CMS boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
19
AABOUD
2019U
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, cross sections
$1.12$ $\pm0.29$ 20
SIRUNYAN
2019AT
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV
$1.16$ ${}^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$ 21
AABOUD
2018BN
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.98$ ${}^{+0.22}_{-0.21}$ 22
AABOUD
2018BN
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 7, 8, 13 TeV
$1.01$ $\pm0.20$ 23
AABOUD
2018BN
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, ggF, VBF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ 7, 8, 13 TeV
$2.5$ ${}^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ 24, 25
AABOUD
2018BQ
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, VBF, ggF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$, 13 TeV
$3.0$ ${}^{+1.7}_{-1.6}$ 24, 26
AABOUD
2018BQ
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, VBF, 13 TeV
27
AALTONEN
2018C
 CDF ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
$1.19$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.38}$ 28
SIRUNYAN
2018AE
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV
$1.06$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.29}$ 29
SIRUNYAN
2018AE
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 7, 8, 13 TeV
$1.06$ $\pm0.26$ 30
SIRUNYAN
2018DB
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$
$1.01$ $\pm0.22$ 31
SIRUNYAN
2018DB
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 7, 8, 13 TeV
$1.04$ $\pm0.20$ 32
SIRUNYAN
2018DB
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, ggF, VBF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ 7, 8, 13 TeV
$2.3$ ${}^{+1.8}_{-1.6}$ 33
SIRUNYAN
2018E
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, boosted, 13 TeV
$1.20$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.23}$ ${}^{+0.34}_{-0.28}$ 34
AABOUD
2017BA
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 13 TeV, 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$
$0.90$ $\pm0.18$ ${}^{+0.21}_{-0.19}$ 35
AABOUD
2017BA
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, 7, 8, 13 TeV
$-0.8$ $\pm1.3$ ${}^{+1.8}_{-1.9}$ 36
AABOUD
2016X
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, VBF, 8 TeV
$0.62$ $\pm0.37$ 5
AAD
2016AN
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$0.81$ ${}^{+0.45}_{-0.43}$ 5
AAD
2016AN
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$0.63$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.30}$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.23}$ 37
AAD
2016K
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$0.52$ $\pm0.32$ $\pm0.24$ 38
AAD
2015G
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$2.8$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-1.4}$ 39
KHACHATRYAN
2015Z
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, VBF, 8 TeV
$1.03$ ${}^{+0.44}_{-0.42}$ 40
KHACHATRYAN
2015Z
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 8 TeV, combined
$1.0$ $\pm0.5$ 41
CHATRCHYAN
2014AI
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV
$1.72$ ${}^{+0.92}_{-0.87}$ 42
AALTONEN
2013L
 CDF ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
$1.23$ ${}^{+1.24}_{-1.17}$ 43
ABAZOV
2013L
 D0 ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
$0.5$ $\pm2.2$ 44
AAD
2012AI
 ATLS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7 TeV
45
AALTONEN
2012T
 TEVA ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV
$0.48$ ${}^{+0.81}_{-0.70}$ 46
CHATRCHYAN
2012N
 CMS ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV
1  CMS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 2) using up to 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. See their Fig. 2 right.
2  AAD 2021AB search for ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (${{\mathit V}}$ = ${{\mathit W}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}$) using 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. Cross sections are given in their Table 13 and Fig. 7, which are based on the simplified template cross section framework (reduced stage-1.2). Wilson coefficients of the Warsaw-basis operators are given in their Fig. 9.
3  AAD 2021AJ present measurements of ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in the VBF production mode. The inclusive VBF cross sections with and without the branching ratio of ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ are $2.07$ $\pm0.70$ ${}^{+0.46}_{-0.37}$ fb and $3.56$ $\pm1.21$ ${}^{+0.80}_{-0.64}$ fb, respectively. The latter is obtained assuming the SM value of B(${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$) = 0.5809 and ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
4  AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.0$ $\pm0.5$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $0.4$ $\pm0.4$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.1$ $\pm1.0$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.
5  AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
6  AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
7  AAD 2024F present studies of the ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ production mode in the boosted ${{\mathit V}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit q}}{{\overline{\mathit q}}}$ and ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ($p_T({{\mathit H}}$) $>$ 250 GeV) using 137 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and corresponds to a significance of 1.7 standard deviations. The corresponding inclusive cross section is $3.1$ $\pm1.3$ ${}^{+1.8}_{-1.4}$ pb. The signal strengths and cross sections are given in their Table I for three $p_T({{\mathit H}}$) regions: 250 $<$ $p_T({{\mathit H}}$) $<$ 450 GeV, 450 $<$ $p_T({{\mathit H}}$) $<$ 650 GeV, 650 GeV $<$ $p_T({{\mathit H}}$) with $\vert $y(${{\mathit H}})\vert $ $<$ 2.
8  HAYRAPETYAN 2024AM search for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ using 133 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The upper limit at 95$\%$ CL on the ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production is 5.0 times the SM prediction.
9  HAYRAPETYAN 2024AY present measurements of boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ($p_T$ $>$ 450 GeV) via VBF or gluon fusion productions using 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The result is given for the VBF production. See their Table 3. The ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production rates are fixed to the SM values. The VBF signal strengths and the fiducial cross sections for two different m$_{{{\mathit j}} {{\mathit j}}}$ regions and STXS stage 1.2 bins are shown in their Figs. 9 and 10, respectively.
10  HAYRAPETYAN 2024AY present measurements of boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ ($p_T$ $>$ 450 GeV) via VBF or gluon fusion productions using 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The result is given for the gluon fusion production. See their Table 3. The ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production rates are fixed to the SM values. The gluon fusion signal strengths and the fiducial cross sections for 6 different $p_T$ regions and STXS stage 1.2 bins are shown in their Figs. 9 and 10, respectively.
11  HAYRAPETYAN 2024U present measurements of ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in the VBF production mode using 90.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV constraining the ggF production to be the SM expectation. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 2.4 standard deviations.
12  HAYRAPETYAN 2024U present measurements of ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in the inclusive (ggF+VBF) production mode using 90.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 2.6 standard deviations.
13  HAYRAPETYAN 2024U present measurements of ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in the ggF and VBF production modes using 90.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The signal strengths for the ggF and VBF production modes are independently obtained. See their Fig. 11.
14  TUMASYAN 2024 report the measurement of ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (${{\mathit V}}$ = ${{\mathit W}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}$) using 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 6.3 standard deviations. Signal strengths for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ and ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ are given in their Fig. 7. Signal strengths and $\sigma \cdot{}B$ for 8 different bins defined based on the the simplified template cross section framework are given in their Figs. 8 and 9 and Table VII.
15  AAD 2022X measure cross sections using a boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with large-radius jets. The data is 136 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. All the results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. The inclusive signal strength is given using data with a ${{\mathit H}}$ candidate jet $p_T>$250 GeV. The fiducial ${{\mathit H}}$ production cross section ($p_T({{\mathit H}})>$450 GeV and $\vert $y(${{\mathit H}})\vert <$2) is $<$115 fb (95$\%$ CL) and the upper limits for other four different $p_T$ regions are shown in their Fig 12. The measured fiducial ${{\mathit H}}$ production cross section ($p_T({{\mathit H}})>$1 TeV) is $2.3$ $\pm3.9$(stat)$\pm1.3$(syst)$\pm0.5$(theory) fb.
16  AAD 2021H present measurements of ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with a boosted vector boson ($p_T$ $>$ 250 GeV) using 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. Cross sections are given in their Table 6 and Fig. 4, which are based on the simplified template cross section framework (reduced stage-1.2). Wilson coefficients of the Warsaw-basis operators are given in their Fig. 5.
17  AAD 2021M search for VBF+${{\mathit \gamma}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ using 132 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
18  SIRUNYAN 2020BL search for boosted ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (a ${{\mathit H}}$ candidate jet $p_T>$450 GeV) using 137 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 2.5 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. A differential fiducial cross section as a function of Higgs boson $p_T$ for ggF is shown in their Fig. 7, assuming the other production modes occur at the expected SM rates. The reported value is $3.7$ $\pm1.2$ ${}^{+0.8}_{-0.7}{}^{+0.8}_{-0.5}$ where the last uncertainty comes from theoretical modeling. We have combined the systematic uncertainties in quadrature.
19  AABOUD 2019U measure cross sections of ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ production as a function of the gauge boson transverse momentum using data of 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$. The kinematic fiducial volumes used is based on the simplified template cross section framework (reduced stage-1). See their Table 3 and Fig. 3.
20  SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
21  AABOUD 2018BN search for ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (${{\mathit V}}$ = ${{\mathit W}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}$) using 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 4.9 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
22  AABOUD 2018BN combine results of 79.8 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with results of ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV.
23  AABOUD 2018BN combine results of ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7, 8 and 13 TeV with results of VBF (+gluon fusion) and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7, 8, and 13 TeV to perform a search for the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ decay. The quoted signal strength assumes a SM production strength and corresponds to a significance of 5.4 standard deviations.
24  AABOUD 2018BQ search for ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ produced through vector-boson fusion (VBF) and VBF+${{\mathit \gamma}}$ with 30.6 fb${}^{-1}{{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
25  The signal strength is measured including all production modes (VBF, ggF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$).
26  The signal strength is measured for VBF-only and others (ggF, ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$) are constrained to Standard Model expectations with uncertainties described in their Section VIII B.
27  AALTONEN 2018C use 5.4 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The upper limit at 95$\%$ CL on ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ is 33 times the SM prediction, which corresponds to a cross section of 40.6 pb.
28  SIRUNYAN 2018AE use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to 3.3 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
29  SIRUNYAN 2018AE combine the result of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with the results obtained from data of up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 18.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV (CHATRCHYAN 2014AI and KHACHATRYAN 2015Z). The quoted signal strength corresponds to 3.8 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
30  SIRUNYAN 2018DB search for ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ (${{\mathit V}}$ = ${{\mathit W}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}$) using 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collision data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 4.4 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
31  SIRUNYAN 2018DB combine the result of 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with the results obtained from data of up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 18.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength corresponds to a significance of 4.8 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
32  SIRUNYAN 2018DB combine results of 77.2 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with results of gluon fusion (ggF), VBF and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV, 8 TeV and 13 TeV to perform a search for the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ decay. The quoted signal strength assumes a SM production strength and corresponds to a significance of 5.6 standard deviations and is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
33  SIRUNYAN 2018E use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. They measure ${{\mathit \sigma}}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$ for gluon fusion production of ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ with $p_T>$450 GeV, $\vert \eta \vert <$2.5 to be $74$ $\pm48$ ${}^{+17}_{-10}$ fb.
34  AABOUD 2017BA use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. They give ${\mathit \sigma (}$W H${)}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}({{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$) = $1.08$ ${}^{+0.54}_{-0.47}$ pb and ${\mathit \sigma (}$Z H${)}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}({{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$) = $0.57$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.23}$ pb.
35  AABOUD 2017BA combine 7, 8 and 13 TeV analyses. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
36  AABOUD 2016X search for vector-boson fusion production of ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in 20.2 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
37  AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
38  AAD 2015G use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
39  KHACHATRYAN 2015Z search for vector-boson fusion production of ${{\mathit H}}$ decaying to ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$ in up to 19.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
40  KHACHATRYAN 2015Z combined vector boson fusion, ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production results. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
41  CHATRCHYAN 2014AI use up to 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 18.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2014AJ.
42  AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
43  ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.
44  AAD 2012AI obtain results based on $4.6 - 4.8$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given in their Fig. 10 for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also Fig. 13 of AAD 2012DA.
45  AALTONEN 2012T combine AALTONEN 2012Q, AALTONEN 2012R, AALTONEN 2012S, ABAZOV 2012O, ABAZOV 2012P, and ABAZOV 2012K. An excess of events over background is observed which is most significant in the region ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = $120 - 135$ GeV, with a local significance of up to 3.3 $\sigma $. The local significance at ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV is 2.8 $\sigma $, which corresponds to (${\mathit \sigma (}{{\mathit H}}{{\mathit W}}{)}$ + ${\mathit \sigma (}{{\mathit H}}{{\mathit Z}}{)}$) $\cdot{}$ B(${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit b}}{{\overline{\mathit b}}}$) = ($0.23$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$) pb, compared to the Standard Model expectation at ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV of $0.12$ $\pm0.01$ pb. Superseded by AALTONEN 2013M.
46  CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on 5.0 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=7 TeV and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$=125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.
References