pdgLive

${{\mathit H}}$ SIGNAL STRENGTHS IN DIFFERENT CHANNELS

The ${{\mathit H}}$ signal strength in a particular final state ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$ is given by the cross section times branching ratio in this channel normalized to the Standard Model (SM) value, $\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}$) $/$ ($\sigma $ $\cdot{}$ B( ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit x}}{{\mathit x}}))_{{\mathrm {SM}}}$, for the specified mass value of ${{\mathit H}}$. For the SM predictions, see DITTMAIER 2011, DITTMAIER 2012, and HEINEMEYER 2013A. Results for fiducial and differential cross sections are also listed below.

${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ Final State

VALUE

DOCUMENT ID

TECN

COMMENT

$\bf{ 1.10 \pm0.06}$

OUR AVERAGE

$1.04$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV

$1.13$ $\pm0.09$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV

$1.14$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.18}$

LHC

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV

$5.97$ ${}^{+3.39}_{-3.12}$

TEVA

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV

• • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • •

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, cross sections

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, diff. x-sections

$1.12$ $\pm0.09$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV

$1.20$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.14}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV, diff. x-section

$0.99$ ${}^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 13 TeV

$1.18$ ${}^{+0.17}_{-0.14}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$, 13 TeV, floated ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$

$1.14$ ${}^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV

$1.11$ ${}^{+0.25}_{-0.23}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 8 TeV, diff. x-section

$1.17$ $\pm0.23$ ${}^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ ${}^{+0.12}_{-0.08}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 8 TeV, diff. x-section

$1.14$ $\pm0.21$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.05}$ ${}^{+0.13}_{-0.09}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7, 8 TeV

$1.55$ ${}^{+0.33}_{-0.28}$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$, 7 and 8 TeV

$7.81$ ${}^{+4.61}_{-4.42}$

CDF

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV

$4.20$ ${}^{+4.60}_{-4.20}$

D0

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 1.96 TeV

$1.8$ $\pm0.5$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV

$2.2$ $\pm0.7$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7 TeV

$1.5$ $\pm0.6$

ATLS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 8 TeV

$1.54$ ${}^{+0.46}_{-0.42}$

CMS

${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, 7, 8 TeV

¹

AAD 2023Y use 139 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and ${\Gamma}_{{\mathit H}}$ = 4.07 MeV. Measured $\sigma \cdot{}B$ and ratios to the SM predictions for the different production modes are shown in their Table 9 and Fig. 9. Measured cross sections and ratios to the SM predictions in the reduced stage-1.2 (see their Fig. 11) simplified template cross section framework are shown in their Table 10 and Fig. 12. Wilson coefficients in the Warsaw basis (see their Table 11) at 95$\%$ CL are measured; see their Table 16 and Fig. 17.

²	CMS 2022 report combined results (see their Extended Data Table 2) using up to 138 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV, assuming ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. See their Fig. 2 right.

³

AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.10$ ${}^{+0.23}_{-0.22}$ for gluon fusion, $1.3$ $\pm0.5$ for vector boson fusion, $0.5$ ${}^{+1.3}_{-1.2}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $0.5$ ${}^{+3.0}_{-2.5}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $2.2$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.

⁴	AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.

⁵

AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

⁶

TUMASYAN 2023Q measure fiducial and differential cross sections at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with 137 fb${}^{-1}$ data. The quoted results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. The inclusive fiducial $\sigma \cdot{}B$ is $73.4$ ${}^{+5.4}_{-5.3}$(stat)${}^{+2.4}_{-2.2}$(syst) fb with their defined fiducial region (see their Section 7 and Table 2), where $75.4$ $\pm4.1$ fb is expected in the Standard Model. See their Fig. 8 including other fiducial $\sigma \cdot{}B$ defined in their Table 3. Differential $\sigma \cdot{}B$ are shown in their Figs. $10 - 15$. Double-differential $\sigma \cdot{}B$ are in their Figs. 16 and 17.

⁷

AAD 2022N measure fiducial and differential cross sections of ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with 139 fb${}^{-1}$ data. The quoted results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. The inclusive fiducial ${{\mathit \sigma}}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$ is $67$ $\pm5$ $\pm4$ fb with their defined fiducial region. Other fiducial $\sigma \cdot{}B$ are in their Table 3. Differential $\sigma \cdot{}B$ are shown in their Figs. $8 - 13$, 15, $25 - 32$, 35, 36. Double-differential $\sigma \cdot{}B$ are in their Figs. 14, 33, 34. Modifications of the ${{\mathit b}}$- and ${{\mathit c}}$-quark Yukawa couplings to ${{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{b}}}}$ and ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{{c}}}}$ at 95$\%$ CL are in their Table 6 and Fig. 18. Wilson coefficients at 95$\%$ CL are in their Table 7 and Fig. 21.

⁸

SIRUNYAN 2021O measures cross sections and couplings with the ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ channel using 137 fb${}^{-1}$ data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. Results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.38 GeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are given in their Fig. 16. Cross sections are given in their Tables 12 and 13 and Figs. 18 and 20, which are based on the simplified template cross section framework (reduced stage-1.2). Results in the $\kappa $-framework are given in their Fig. 22.

⁹	SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.

¹⁰	SIRUNYAN 2019L measure fiducial and differential cross sections of the process ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$. See their Figs. $4 - 11$.

¹¹

AABOUD 2018BO use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The signal strengths for the individual production modes are: $0.81$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.18}$ for gluon fusion, $2.0$ ${}^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$ for vector boson fusion, $0.7$ ${}^{+0.9}_{-0.8}$ for ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}}$ production (${{\mathit V}}$ = ${{\mathit W}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}$), and $0.5$ $\pm0.6$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ and ${{\mathit t}}{{\mathit H}}$ production. Other measurements of cross sections and couplings are summarized in their Section 10. The quoted values are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.

¹²

SIRUNYAN 2018DS use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}$ collisions with ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The Higgs mass is floated in the measurement of a signal strength. The result is $1.18$ ${}^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$(stat.)${}^{+0.09}_{-0.07}$(syst.)${}^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$(theory), which is largely insensitive to the Higgs mass around 125 GeV.

¹³

KHACHATRYAN 2016G measure fiducial and differential cross sections of the process ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV with 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$. See their Figs. $4 - 6$ and Table 1 for data.

¹⁴

AAD 2014BC use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The last uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.4 GeV. The signal strengths for the individual production modes are: $1.32$ $\pm0.38$ for gluon fusion, $0.8$ $\pm0.7$ for vector boson fusion, $1.0$ $\pm1.6$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, $0.1$ ${}^{+3.7}_{-0.1}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production, and $1.6$ ${}^{+2.7}_{-1.8}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production.

¹⁵

AAD 2014BJ measure fiducial and differential cross sections of the process ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit X}}$, ${{\mathit H}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV with 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$. See their Table 3 and Figs. $3 - 12$ for data.

¹⁶

KHACHATRYAN 2014P use 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The last uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 124.7 GeV. The signal strength for the gluon fusion and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production mode is $1.13$ ${}^{+0.37}_{-0.31}$, while the signal strength for the vector boson fusion and ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}}$, ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}}$ production mode is $1.16$ ${}^{+0.63}_{-0.58}$.

¹⁷	AAD 2013AK use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125.5 GeV.

¹⁸	AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

¹⁹	ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 125 GeV.

²⁰	AAD 2012AI obtain results based on 4.8 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 5.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also AAD 2012DA.

²¹

CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=7 TeV and 5.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}}}$=125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.

Except where otherwise noted, content of the 2024 Review of Particle Physics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. The publication of the Review of Particle Physics is supported by US DOE, MEXT (Japan), INFN (Italy) and CERN. Individual collaborators receive support for their PDG activities from their respective institutes or funding agencies. © 2024. See LBNL disclaimers.