$\bf{
1.15 {}^{+0.16}_{-0.15}}$
|
OUR AVERAGE
|
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.22}$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.11}$ |
1 |
|
ATLS |
$1.24$ ${}^{+0.29}_{-0.27}$ |
2 |
|
CMS |
$1.11$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ |
3, 4 |
|
LHC |
$1.68$ ${}^{+2.28}_{-1.68}$ |
5 |
|
TEVA |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$2.5$ ${}^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ |
6 |
|
CMS |
$1.02$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ |
7 |
|
CMS |
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.27}_{-0.26}$ |
8 |
|
CMS |
$0.98$ $\pm0.18$ |
9 |
|
CMS |
$2.3$ $\pm1.6$ |
10 |
|
ATLS |
$1.41$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.36}$ |
4 |
|
ATLS |
$0.88$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.28}$ |
4 |
|
CMS |
$1.44$ ${}^{+0.30}_{-0.29}$ ${}^{+0.29}_{-0.23}$ |
11 |
|
ATLS |
$1.43$ ${}^{+0.27}_{-0.26}$ ${}^{+0.32}_{-0.25}$ $\pm0.09$ |
12 |
|
ATLS |
$0.78$ $\pm0.27$ |
13 |
|
CMS |
$0.00$ ${}^{+8.44}_{-0.00}$ |
14 |
|
CDF |
$3.96$ ${}^{+4.11}_{-3.38}$ |
15 |
|
D0 |
$0.4$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-2.0}$ |
16 |
|
ATLS |
$0.09$ ${}^{+0.76}_{-0.74}$ |
17 |
|
CMS |
1
AABOUD 2019AQ use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The first, second and third quoted errors are statistical, experimental systematic and theory systematic uncertainties, respectively. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV and corresponds to 4.4 standard deviations. Combining with 7 TeV and 8 TeV results (AAD 2015AH), the observed significance is 6.4 standard deviations. The cross sections in the ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \tau}}{{\mathit \tau}}$ decay channel (${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV) are measured to $3.77$ ${}^{+0.60}_{-0.59}$ (stat) ${}^{+0.87}_{-0.74}$ (syst) pb for the inclusive, $0.28$ $\pm0.09$ ${}^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ pb for VBF, and $3.1$ $\pm1.0$ ${}^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ pb for gluon-fusion production. See their Table XI for the cross sections in the framework of simplified template cross sections.
|
2
SIRUNYAN 2019AF use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ /${{\mathit Z}}$ channels are added with a few updates on gluon fusion and vector boson fusion with respect to SIRUNYAN 2018Y. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV and corresponds to 5.5 standard deviations. The signal strengths for the individual production modes are: $1.12$ ${}^{+0.53}_{-0.50}$ for gluon fusion, $1.13$ ${}^{+0.45}_{-0.42}$ for vector boson fusion, $3.39$ ${}^{+1.68}_{-1.54}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ and $1.23$ ${}^{+1.62}_{-1.35}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ . See their Fig. 7 for other couplings ( ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{V,}}}{{\mathit \kappa}_{{f}}}$ ).
|
3
AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.0$ $\pm0.6$ for gluon fusion, $1.3$ $\pm0.4$ for vector boson fusion, $-1.4$ $\pm1.4$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production, $2.2$ ${}^{+2.2}_{-1.8}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production, and $-1.9$ ${}^{+3.7}_{-3.3}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production.
|
4
AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
|
5
AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
6
SIRUNYAN 2019AF use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV and corresponds to 2.3 standard deviations.
|
7
SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. This combination is based on SIRUNYAN 2018Y.
|
8
SIRUNYAN 2018Y use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and corresponds to 4.9 standard deviations.
|
9
SIRUNYAN 2018Y combine the result of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV with the results obtained from data of 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV (KHACHATRYAN 2015AM). The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV and corresponds to 5.9 standard deviations.
|
10
AAD 2016AC measure the signal strength with ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit W}}$ / ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit X}}$ processes using 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
11
AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
|
12
AAD 2015AH use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The third uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The signal strength for the gluon fusion mode is $2.0$ $\pm0.8$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-0.8}$ $\pm0.3$ and that for vector boson fusion and ${{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production modes is $1.24$ ${}^{+0.49}_{-0.45}{}^{+0.31}_{-0.29}$ $\pm0.08$. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
|
13
CHATRCHYAN 2014K use 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2014AJ.
|
14
AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
15
ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
16
AAD 2012AI obtain results based on 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given in their Fig. 10 for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also Fig. 13 of AAD 2012DA.
|
17
CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=7 TeV and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$=8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$=125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y .
|