$\bf{
1.19 \pm0.12}$
|
OUR AVERAGE
|
$1.28$ ${}^{+0.17}_{-0.16}$ |
1 |
|
CMS |
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.16}$ |
2, 3 |
|
LHC |
$0.94$ ${}^{+0.85}_{-0.83}$ |
4 |
|
TEVA |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
|
5 |
|
ATLS |
$2.5$ ${}^{+0.9}_{-0.8}$ |
6 |
|
ATLS |
$1.28$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$ |
7 |
|
CMS |
$1.22$ ${}^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$ |
3 |
|
ATLS |
$0.90$ ${}^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$ |
3 |
|
CMS |
|
8 |
|
ATLS |
$1.18$ $\pm0.16$ ${}^{+0.17}_{-0.14}$ |
9 |
|
ATLS |
$1.09$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.15}$ ${}^{+0.17}_{-0.14}$ |
10 |
|
ATLS |
$3.0$ ${}^{+1.3}_{-1.1}$ ${}^{+1.0}_{-0.7}$ |
11 |
|
ATLS |
$1.16$ ${}^{+0.16}_{-0.15}$ ${}^{+0.18}_{-0.15}$ |
12 |
|
ATLS |
$0.72$ $\pm0.12$ $\pm0.10$ ${}^{+0.12}_{-0.10}$ |
13 |
|
CMS |
$0.99$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.28}$ |
14 |
|
ATLS |
$0.00$ ${}^{+1.78}_{-0.00}$ |
15 |
|
CDF |
$1.90$ ${}^{+1.63}_{-1.52}$ |
16 |
|
D0 |
$1.3$ $\pm0.5$ |
17 |
|
ATLS |
$0.5$ $\pm0.6$ |
17 |
|
ATLS |
$1.9$ $\pm0.7$ |
17 |
|
ATLS |
$0.60$ ${}^{+0.42}_{-0.37}$ |
18 |
|
CMS |
1
SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
|
2
AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $0.84$ $\pm0.17$ for gluon fusion, $1.2$ $\pm0.4$ for vector boson fusion, $1.6$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$ for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production, $5.9$ ${}^{+2.6}_{-2.2}$ for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production, and $5.0$ ${}^{+1.8}_{-1.7}$ for ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production.
|
3
AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
|
4
AALTONEN 2013M combine all Tevatron data from the CDF and D0 Collaborations with up to 10.0 fb${}^{-1}$ and 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$, respectively, of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
5
AABOUD 2019F measure cross-sections times the ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ branching fraction in the ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ channel using 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV: $\sigma _{ggF}{\times }$B( ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ) = $11.4$ ${}^{+1.2}_{-1.1}{}^{+1.8}_{-1.7}$ pb and $\sigma _{VBF}{\times }$B( ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ ) = $0.50$ ${}^{+0.24}_{-0.22}$ $\pm0.17$ pb.
|
6
AAD 2019A use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ data at 13 TeV. The cross section times branching fraction values are measured to be $0.67$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.27}{}^{+0.18}_{-0.14}$ pb for ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ and $0.54$ ${}^{+0.31}_{-0.24}{}^{+0.15}_{-0.07}$ pb for ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ .
|
7
SIRUNYAN 2019AX measure the signal strengths, cross sections and so on using gluon fusion, VBF and ${{\mathit V}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production processes with 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. Signal strengths for each production process is found in their Fig. 9. Measured cross sections and ratios to the SM predictions in the stage-0 simplified template cross section framework are shown in their Fig. 10. ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{F}}}$ = $1.52$ ${}^{+0.48}_{-0.41}$ and ${{\mathit \kappa}_{{V}}}$ = $1.10$ $\pm0.08$ are obtained (see their Fig. 11 (right)).
|
8
AAD 2016AO measure fiducial total and differential cross sections of gluon fusion process at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV with 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ using ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit e}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \mu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ . The measured fiducial total cross section is $36.0$ $\pm9.7$ fb in their fiducial region (Table 7). See their Fig. 6 for fiducial differential cross sections. The results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
9
AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
|
10
AAD 2015AA use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The signal strength for the gluon fusion and vector boson fusion mode is $1.02$ $\pm0.19$ ${}^{+0.22}_{-0.18}$ and $1.27$ ${}^{+0.44}_{-0.40}{}^{+0.30}_{-0.21}$, respectively. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
|
11
AAD 2015AQ use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
|
12
AAD 2015AQ combine their result on ${{\mathit W}}$ $/$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production with the results of AAD 2015AA (gluon fusion and vector boson fusion, slightly updated). The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
|
13
CHATRCHYAN 2014G use 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.4 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The last uncertainty in the measurement is theory systematics. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.6 GeV.
|
14
AAD 2013AK use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. Superseded by AAD 2015AA.
|
15
AALTONEN 2013L combine all CDF results with $9.45 - 10.0$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
16
ABAZOV 2013L combine all D0 results with up to 9.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\overline{\mathit p}}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 1.96 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
17
AAD 2012AI obtain results based on 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also AAD 2012DA.
|
18
CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.
|