$\bf{
1.20 {}^{+0.12}_{-0.11}}$
|
OUR AVERAGE
|
$1.06$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.17}$ |
|
1 |
|
CMS |
$1.28$ ${}^{+0.21}_{-0.19}$ |
|
2 |
|
ATLS |
$1.29$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.23}$ |
|
3, 4 |
|
LHC |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$<6.5$ |
95 |
5 |
|
ATLS |
$<3.8$ |
95 |
6 |
|
ATLS |
$1.05$ ${}^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$ ${}^{+0.11}_{-0.09}$ |
|
7 |
|
CMS |
$1.52$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.34}$ |
|
4 |
|
ATLS |
$1.04$ ${}^{+0.32}_{-0.26}$ |
|
4 |
|
CMS |
$1.46$ ${}^{+0.35}_{-0.31}$ ${}^{+0.19}_{-0.13}$ |
|
8 |
|
ATLS |
|
|
9 |
|
CMS |
$1.44$ ${}^{+0.34}_{-0.31}$ ${}^{+0.21}_{-0.11}$ |
|
10 |
|
ATLS |
|
|
11 |
|
ATLS |
$0.93$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.23}$ ${}^{+0.13}_{-0.09}$ |
|
12 |
|
CMS |
$1.43$ ${}^{+0.40}_{-0.35}$ |
|
13 |
|
ATLS |
$0.80$ ${}^{+0.35}_{-0.28}$ |
|
14 |
|
CMS |
$1.2$ $\pm0.6$ |
|
15 |
|
ATLS |
$1.4$ $\pm1.1$ |
|
15 |
|
ATLS |
$1.1$ $\pm0.8$ |
|
15 |
|
ATLS |
$0.73$ ${}^{+0.45}_{-0.33}$ |
|
16 |
|
CMS |
1
SIRUNYAN 2019AT perform a combine fit to 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV.
|
2
AABOUD 2018AJ perform analyses using ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$ ) with data of 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. Results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. The inclusive cross section times branching ratio for ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ decay ($\vert \eta ({{\mathit H}^{0}})\vert $ $<$ 2.5) is measured to be $1.73$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ pb (with $1.34$ ${}^{+0.09}_{-0.09}$ pb expected in the SM).
|
3
AAD 2016AN perform fits to the ATLAS and CMS data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 and 8 TeV. The signal strengths for individual production processes are $1.13$ ${}^{+0.34}_{-0.31}$ for gluon fusion and $0.1$ ${}^{+1.1}_{-0.6}$ for vector boson fusion.
|
4
AAD 2016AN: In the fit, relative production cross sections are fixed to those in the Standard Model. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV.
|
5
AABOUD 2019N measure the spectrum of the four-lepton invariant mass m$_{ 4 {{\mathit \ell}} }$ (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ or ${{\mathit \mu}}$) using 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength upper limit is obtained from 180 GeV $<$ m$_{ 4 {{\mathit \ell}} }$ $<$ 1200 GeV.
|
6
AABOUD 2018BP measure an off-shell Higgs boson production using ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ and ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ 2 ${{\mathit \ell}}$2 ${{\mathit \nu}}$ (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$ ) decay channels with 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of data at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength upper limit is obtained from a combination of these two channels, where 220 GeV $<$ m$_{ 4 {{\mathit \ell}} }$ $<$ 2000 GeV for ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ and 250 GeV $<$ m${}^{ZZ}_{T}$ $<$ 2000 GeV for ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ 2 ${{\mathit \ell}}$2 ${{\mathit \nu}}$ (m${}^{ZZ}_{T}$ is defined in their Section 5). See their Table 2 for each measurement.
|
7
SIRUNYAN 2017AV use 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. The quoted signal strength, obtained from the analysis of ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$ ) decays, is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.09 GeV. The signal strengths for different production modes are given in their Table 3. The fiducial and differential cross sections are shown in their Fig. 10.
|
8
AAD 2016K use up to 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and up to 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV.
|
9
KHACHATRYAN 2016AR use data of 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at 8 TeV. The fiducial cross sections for the production of 4 leptons via ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ decays are measured to be $0.56$ ${}^{+0.67}_{-0.44}{}^{+0.21}_{-0.06}$ fb at 7 TeV and $1.11$ ${}^{+0.41}_{-0.35}{}^{+0.14}_{-0.10}$ fb at 8 TeV in their fiducial region (Table 2). The differential cross sections at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV are also shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The results are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV.
|
10
AAD 2015F use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.36 GeV. The signal strength for the gluon fusion production mode is $1.66$ ${}^{+0.45}_{-0.41}{}^{+0.25}_{-0.15}$, while the signal strength for the vector boson fusion production mode is $0.26$ ${}^{+1.60}_{-0.91}{}^{+0.36}_{-0.23}$.
|
11
AAD 2014AR measure the cross section for ${{\mathit p}}$ ${{\mathit p}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit H}^{0}}{{\mathit X}}$ , ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ using 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. They give ${{\mathit \sigma}}\cdot{}{{\mathit B}}$ = $2.11$ ${}^{+0.53}_{-0.47}$ $\pm0.08$ fb in their fiducial region, where $1.30$ $\pm0.13$ fb is expected in the Standard Model for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.4 GeV. Various differential cross sections are also given, which are in agreement with the Standard Model expectations.
|
12
CHATRCHYAN 2014AA use 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.6 GeV. The signal strength for the gluon fusion and ${{\mathit t}}{{\overline{\mathit t}}}{{\mathit H}}$ production mode is $0.80$ ${}^{+0.46}_{-0.36}$, while the signal strength for the vector boson fusion and ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ , ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit H}^{0}}$ production mode is $1.7$ ${}^{+2.2}_{-2.1}$.
|
13
AAD 2013AK use 4.7 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.5 GeV.
|
14
CHATRCHYAN 2013J obtain results based on ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ final states in 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 12.2 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strength is given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.8 GeV. Superseded by CHATRCHYAN 2014AA.
|
15
AAD 2012AI obtain results based on $4.7 - 4.8$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 5.8 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 126 GeV. See also AAD 2012DA.
|
16
CHATRCHYAN 2012N obtain results based on $4.9 - 5.1$ fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and $5.1 - 5.3$ fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. An excess of events over background with a local significance of 5.0 $\sigma $ is observed at about ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125 GeV. The quoted signal strengths are given for ${\mathit m}_{{{\mathit H}^{0}}}$ = 125.5 GeV. See also CHATRCHYAN 2012BY and CHATRCHYAN 2013Y.
|