$\bf{
<0.013}$
|
OUR EVALUATION
|
$0.0032$ ${}^{+0.0028}_{-0.0022}$ |
|
1 |
|
CMS |
$<0.0144$ |
95 |
2 |
|
ATLS |
$<1.10$ |
95 |
3 |
|
CMS |
$\bf{<0.013}$ |
95 |
4 |
|
CMS |
$<1.7$ |
95 |
5 |
|
CMS |
$ > 3.5 \times 10^{-12}$ |
95 |
6 |
|
CMS |
$<5.0$ |
95 |
7 |
|
ATLS |
$<2.6$ |
95 |
7 |
|
ATLS |
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • • |
$<0.026$ |
95 |
8 |
|
CMS |
$<0.0227$ |
95 |
9 |
|
ATLS |
$<0.046$ |
95 |
10 |
|
CMS |
$<3.4$ |
95 |
11 |
|
CMS |
$<0.022$ |
95 |
12 |
|
CMS |
$<2.4$ |
95 |
13 |
|
CMS |
1
SIRUNYAN 2019BL measure the width and anomalous ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit V}}{{\mathit V}}$ couplings from on-shell and off-shell production in the 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ final state. Data of 80.2 fb${}^{-1}$ at 13 TeV, 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at 8 TeV, and 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at 7 TeV are used. The total width for the SM-like couplings is measured to be also [0.08, 9.16] MeV with 95$\%$ CL, assuming SM-like couplings for on- and off-shells (see their Table VIII). Constraints on the total width for anomalous ${{\mathit H}}{{\mathit V}}{{\mathit V}}$ interaction cases are found in their Table IX. See their Table X for the Higgs boson signal strength in the off-shell region.
|
2
AABOUD 2018BP use 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV. An observed upper limit on the off-shell Higgs signal strength of 3.8 is obtained at 95$\%$ CL using off-shell Higgs boson production in the ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ and ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}}$ $\rightarrow$ 2 ${{\mathit \ell}}$2 ${{\mathit \nu}}$ decay channels (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$ ). Combining with the on-shell signal strength measurements, the quoted upper limit on the Higgs boson total width is obtained, assuming the ratios of the relevant Higgs-boson couplings to the SM predictions are constant with energy from on-shell production to the high-mass range.
|
3
SIRUNYAN 2017AV obtain an upper limit on the width from the distribution in ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ (${{\mathit \ell}}$ = ${{\mathit e}}$ , ${{\mathit \mu}}$ ) decays. Data of 35.9 fb${}^{-1}$ ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 13 TeV is used. The expected limit is 1.60 GeV.
|
4
KHACHATRYAN 2016BA combine the ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{(*)}}$ result with ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{(*)}}$ results of KHACHATRYAN 2015BA and KHACHATRYAN 2014D.
|
5
KHACHATRYAN 2015AM combine ${{\mathit \gamma}}{{\mathit \gamma}}$ and ${{\mathit Z}}$ ${{\mathit Z}^{*}}$ $\rightarrow$ 4 ${{\mathit \ell}}$ results. The expected limit is 2.3 GeV.
|
6
KHACHATRYAN 2015BA derive a lower limit on the total width from an upper limit on the decay flight distance $\tau $ $<$ $1.9 \times 10^{-13}$ s. 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at 8 TeV are used.
|
7
AAD 2014W use 4.5 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ at 8 TeV. The expected limit is 6.2 GeV.
|
8
KHACHATRYAN 2016BA derive constraints on the total width from comparing ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{(*)}}$ production via on-shell and off-shell ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ using 4.9 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.4 fb${}^{-1}$ at 8 TeV.
|
9
AAD 2015BE derive constraints on the total width from comparing ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{(*)}}$ and ${{\mathit W}}{{\mathit W}^{(*)}}$ production via on-shell and off-shell ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ using 20.3 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The K factor for the background processes is assumed to be equal to that for the signal.
|
10
KHACHATRYAN 2015BA derive constraints on the total width from comparing ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{(*)}}$ production via on-shell and off-shell ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$ with an unconstrained anomalous coupling. 4${{\mathit \ell}}$ final states in 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV are used.
|
11
CHATRCHYAN 2014AA use 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The expected limit is 2.8 GeV.
|
12
KHACHATRYAN 2014D derive constraints on the total width from comparing ${{\mathit Z}}{{\mathit Z}^{(*)}}$ production via on-shell and off-shell ${{\mathit H}^{0}}$. 4${{\mathit \ell}}$ and ${{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \ell}}{{\mathit \nu}}{{\mathit \nu}}$ final states in 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV are used.
|
13
KHACHATRYAN 2014P use 5.1 fb${}^{-1}$ of ${{\mathit p}}{{\mathit p}}$ collisions at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 7 TeV and 19.7 fb${}^{-1}$ at $\mathit E_{{\mathrm {cm}}}$ = 8 TeV. The expected limit is 3.1 GeV.
|