(C) Other neutrino mixing results

The LSND collaboration reported in AGUILAR 2001 a signal which is consistent with ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ oscillations. In a three neutrino framework, this would be a measurement of $\theta _{12}$ and $\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}_{21}$. This does not appear to be consistent with most of the other neutrino data. The following listings include results from ${{\mathit \nu}_{{\mu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$ , ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$ $\rightarrow$ ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ appearance and ${{\mathit \nu}_{{\mu}}}$, ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{\mu}}}$, ${{\mathit \nu}_{{e}}}$, and ${{\overline{\mathit \nu}}_{{e}}}$ disappearance experiments, and searches for $\mathit CPT$ violation.

$\langle \Delta {{\boldsymbol m}^{2}}_{\mathrm {32}}−\Delta {{\overline{\boldsymbol m}}}{}^{2}_{32}\rangle $ INSPIRE search

VALUE ($ 10^{-3} $ eV${}^{2}$) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN  COMMENT
$-0.12$ ${}^{+0.26}_{-0.24}$ 1
ADAMSON
2013B
MINS beam and atmosperic
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
$0.6$ ${}^{+2.4}_{-0.8}$ 90 2
ADAMSON
2012B
MINS MINOS atmospheric
1  ADAMSON 2013B quotes this difference as a negative of our convention.
2  The quoted result is the single-parameter 90$\%$ C.L. interval determined from the 90$\%$ C.L. contour in the ($\Delta \mathit m{}^{2}$, $\Delta \bar m{}^{2}$) plane, which is obtained by minimizing the four parameter log-likelihood function with respect to the other oscillation parameters.
  Conservation Laws:
$\mathit CPT$ INVARIANCE
  References:
ADAMSON 2013B
PRL 110 251801 Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations Using Beam and Atmospheric Data in MINOS
ADAMSON 2012B
PR D86 052007 Measurements of Atmospheric Neutrinos and Antineutrinos in the MINOS Far Detector